dnz ツ

dnz ツ — CS2 Stats

CH76561198027089970[U:1:66824242]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,403Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,875Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24878 of 259900 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,875 +3,142 2 Sept – 1 Nov · 11 days played
21,73325,000peak 25,0002 Sept1 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,219 +0 2 Sept – 23 Sept · 2 observations
2,2192,219peak 2,2192 Sept23 Sept
25,105Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,219Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 125 below peak (25,000)
  • +2,431 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 125 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdnz ツFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,875 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,219csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning58
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–41–10Last 10049%Win rateWWWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 70% on T to 42% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time620ms+51ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 2 Nov →
61%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · poseidon, 20 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 26 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 31 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2112–957%0.01
infernoD153–1220%0.01
poseidonB126–650%-0.00
vertigoA106–460%0.02
debrisC104–640%-0.03
cacheS96–367%0.01
anubisB84–450%0.01
mirageS64–267%0.04
dust2—31–233%-0.03
overpass—22–0100%0.03
eldorado—20–20%-0.03
office—10–10%-0.11
ancient—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,023Matches
50%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
83.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19058%1.2617.3
Anubis15152%1.1016.6
Ancient9647%1.0616.6
Nuke7453%1.2618.3
Inferno7348%1.0917.4
Dust26247%0.9515.0
Overpass3453%1.1116.9
Cache2861%1.1017.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.9%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
552msReaction time
69.7%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
12.52HE damage / grenade
9.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon9–50.0928%2 Nov →
vertigo9–40.0418%2 Nov →
inferno9–10.2238%2 Nov →
nuke9–4-0.0037%2 Nov →
debris5–9-0.1020%2 Nov →
office6–13-0.1113%1 Nov →
anubis8–130.0423%1 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0421%31 Oct →
mirage13–60.0424%31 Oct →
nuke13–20.1223%31 Oct →
debris9–10.0621%31 Oct →
inferno7–90.0025%31 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.1015%31 Oct →
nuke13–110.0418%30 Oct →
poseidon0–9-0.2633%30 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.0625%30 Oct →
nuke5–90.0135%28 Oct →
debris6–9-0.0523%25 Oct →
nuke9–40.0231%25 Oct →
inferno8–80.0228%25 Oct →
vertigo9–60.0418%24 Oct →
nuke9–60.0326%24 Oct →
poseidon8–8-0.0131%24 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0812%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0219%20 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0113%20 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0435%20 Oct →
cache13–110.0419%19 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0125%19 Oct →
nuke13–100.1226%19 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0320%19 Oct →
debris9–50.0431%19 Oct →
vertigo9–20.067%19 Oct →
nuke9–60.2133%19 Oct →
poseidon9–30.0530%19 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.1128%19 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.0533%18 Oct →
cache16–130.0423%18 Oct →
nuke7–3-0.0117%18 Oct →
inferno10–130.0434%16 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0420%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0423%16 Oct →
debris4–9-0.1515%16 Oct →
vertigo8–8-0.0411%16 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0919%16 Oct →
poseidon6–90.0538%16 Oct →
nuke8–8-0.0313%16 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0129%14 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0137%14 Oct →
cache13–80.0326%12 Oct →
overpass9–7-0.0223%10 Oct →
vertigo9–40.2027%10 Oct →
ancient13–80.0114%4 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0427%4 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0120%28 Sept →
cache13–50.0832%28 Sept →
eldorado3–9-0.0514%26 Sept →
debris9–30.0614%26 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.1311%26 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.0833%26 Sept →
vertigo6–90.0227%26 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0419%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0630%25 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0611%25 Sept →
poseidon7–9-0.0125%23 Sept →
vertigo5–9-0.0932%23 Sept →
nuke2–9-0.2021%23 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0347%23 Sept →
inferno9–40.1520%22 Sept →
nuke8–80.0920%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0124%21 Sept →
mirage13–110.0331%21 Sept →
anubis13–30.1118%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0820%21 Sept →
poseidon9–40.0628%21 Sept →
debris3–9-0.0327%21 Sept →
debris8–80.0213%20 Sept →
poseidon9–70.0261%20 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0540%20 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.1017%20 Sept →
eldorado8–8-0.0124%20 Sept →
vertigo4–90.0219%20 Sept →
poseidon9–50.0415%20 Sept →
nuke9–60.0725%20 Sept →
debris9–7-0.093%19 Sept →
poseidon4–9-0.0514%19 Sept →
vertigo9–6-0.0219%19 Sept →
inferno8–80.0124%19 Sept →
nuke9–30.0921%19 Sept →
anubis11–130.0019%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.0318%18 Sept →
cache16–130.0822%18 Sept →
nuke13–60.1017%18 Sept →
inferno8–80.0526%16 Sept →
poseidon9–50.0923%11 Sept →
vertigo9–30.0029%11 Sept →
overpass9–60.0913%11 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0713%11 Sept →
debris5–9-0.0527%11 Sept →
inferno6–90.0627%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.