Kairos

Kairos — CS2 Stats

CH76561198162175272[U:1:201909544]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,530Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,181Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#54103 of 259898 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,181 +651 16 Aug – 1 Nov · 32 days played
20,00022,564peak 22,56416 Aug1 Nov
22,938Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,238Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 383 below peak (22,564)
  • +1,908 over 30 days · improving
  • +651 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,819 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKairosFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,181 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,238csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning58
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLLWWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −71ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility4.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.8
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time590ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 547ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 7–0 · inferno, 16 Aug →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · inferno, 6 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 29 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2310–1343%-0.01
cacheB2010–1050%-0.00
ancientB158–753%-0.02
anubisA149–564%-0.01
nukeB136–746%-0.02
dust2D82–625%-0.02
mirageC73–443%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,463Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
70.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5054%0.9615.5
Anubis4038%0.8313.9
Ancient3043%0.9914.8
Inferno2843%0.8212.9
Nuke2752%0.8013.3
Dust21354%0.8114.9
Overpass1060%0.9314.8
Cache757%0.9716.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
586msReaction time
57.2%T opening success
32.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
10.26HE damage / grenade
7.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.46 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0016%1 Nov →
cache12–16-0.0620%1 Nov →
anubis13–6-0.0114%1 Nov →
cache13–30.0023%1 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.0815%1 Nov →
nuke9–13-0.0729%31 Oct →
ancient13–80.0525%31 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0424%31 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0810%31 Oct →
mirage13–60.0118%31 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0615%31 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0015%30 Oct →
anubis13–80.0124%29 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0225%29 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0212%29 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0314%29 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0422%24 Oct →
anubis13–50.0924%24 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0617%24 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0618%24 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0020%24 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.0319%18 Oct →
cache16–130.0925%18 Oct →
nuke7–30.0416%18 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0722%14 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0916%14 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0321%14 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0712%13 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0319%13 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0916%13 Oct →
cache11–130.0224%10 Oct →
cache13–100.0133%10 Oct →
inferno13–100.0816%10 Oct →
mirage13–90.0318%10 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0933%4 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0318%4 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.015%4 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.1033%4 Oct →
ancient13–80.0625%4 Oct →
cache16–140.0327%4 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0516%3 Oct →
nuke8–130.0330%3 Oct →
inferno10–130.0317%29 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0421%29 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0323%28 Sept →
dust213–20.0118%28 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0328%28 Sept →
inferno13–110.0316%27 Sept →
ancient13–30.0327%27 Sept →
dust215–150.0321%27 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0417%27 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0219%25 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0132%25 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0116%18 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.046%18 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0822%18 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0415%18 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0418%13 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0519%13 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0416%13 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0526%10 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0018%10 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.1021%10 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0213%7 Sept →
ancient13–70.0220%7 Sept →
cache8–130.0516%7 Sept →
anubis13–110.0627%7 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0418%6 Sept →
cache10–130.0129%6 Sept →
inferno9–130.0138%6 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0610%6 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0126%6 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0015%31 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0330%31 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0510%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0521%31 Aug →
nuke13–70.0713%31 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0018%30 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0211%30 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0514%30 Aug →
ancient16–120.0421%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0215%26 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0116%26 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0417%26 Aug →
anubis13–50.0927%24 Aug →
ancient13–50.0216%24 Aug →
cache13–100.0121%24 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0227%24 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0119%21 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0422%21 Aug →
dust24–13-0.078%21 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0210%18 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0320%18 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0718%18 Aug →
nuke5–130.0117%16 Aug →
dust213–160.0320%16 Aug →
cache13–110.0818%16 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0811%16 Aug →
inferno7–00.1023%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.