Definetely not Bella. — CS2 Stats

76561198021095268[U:1:60829540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,168Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,939Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingAll-Rounder

CSDB Leaderboard#179906 of 240767 tracked

WingmanSilver IV

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 12 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,742 +2,299 12 Apr – 17 Jun · 19 days played

9,213Peak Premier in tracked matches

33Days played since 2026-04-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim53

Positioning50

Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

6–14 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.3

Utility3.8

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch5.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3

Positioning5.0

Utility3.8

Mechanics5.2

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time615ms−71ms

first ⅓ avg 685ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms

Headshot accuracy15.5%−1.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 4 May →

50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 4 May →

469msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 4 Jun →

13–1Biggest win · nuke, 12 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	39	17–22	44%	-0.02
ancient	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.02
anubis	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.01
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.01
mirage	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.02
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
overpass	S	6	4–2	67%	-0.03
dust2	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

99,705Lifetime kills

0.81K/D

6,200Matches

38.7%Match win rate

33.1%Headshot %

19.2%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players

9,690MVPs

2,600Hours (in match)

3,203Bombs planted

1,073Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,894

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,537

AWP12,560

P2506,248

Five-SeveN6,165

SG 5534,410

MP73,348

Tec-93,242

AUG3,040

FAMAS2,923

Lifetime map wins

15,512dust2

9,087inferno

5,718nuke

1,925cbble

1,142train

654vertigo

265office

169lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

381Matches

46%Win rate

0.82Avg K/D

74.7ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	77	51%	0.94	15.4
Dust2	45	51%	0.86	14.8
Anubis	39	41%	0.88	13.2
Mirage	35	43%	0.89	14.7
Inferno	17	59%	0.96	14.3
Nuke	16	50%	0.99	14.8
Overpass	9	67%	1.02	14.8
Vertigo	8	25%	0.95	14.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy

34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.8%Spray accuracy

73.2%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

618msReaction time

40.3%T opening success

43.5%CT opening success

0.34Enemies flashed / flash

7.7%Flash assists

15.79HE damage / grenade

1.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3398 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–11	-0.04	20%	21 Sept →
anubis	7–13	0.03	19%	19 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	11%	11 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	17%	11 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.03	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	17%	29 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.02	19%	29 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	8%	27 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	9%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	23%	16 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	30%	16 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	14%	16 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	16%	17 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	8%	17 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.00	22%	8 Jun →
overpass	11–13	-0.08	11%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.00	15%	4 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	5%	4 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.01	8%	3 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	20%	3 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.06	14%	3 Jun →
anubis	5–13	0.00	14%	2 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	18%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.05	19%	26 May →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	16%	26 May →
mirage	13–6	0.02	9%	14 May →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	15%	14 May →
inferno	13–8	0.05	21%	14 May →
mirage	13–8	0.01	24%	14 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	10%	14 May →
anubis	9–13	0.05	11%	14 May →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	11%	13 May →
inferno	13–9	0.02	21%	13 May →
cache	12–12	0.01	15%	13 May →
cache	7–13	-0.02	12%	12 May →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	11%	12 May →
ancient	13–5	0.07	7%	12 May →
nuke	13–1	0.03	18%	12 May →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	32%	12 May →
overpass	13–2	0.02	7%	12 May →
cache	11–13	-0.00	18%	11 May →
cache	8–13	-0.05	11%	11 May →
cache	8–13	-0.00	15%	10 May →
cache	5–13	0.02	15%	10 May →
cache	12–9	-0.03	8%	10 May →
cache	11–7	-0.04	13%	10 May →
cache	10–13	-0.08	9%	9 May →
cache	8–13	-0.07	17%	9 May →
cache	13–10	-0.02	9%	9 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	14%	9 May →
cache	13–11	-0.05	13%	8 May →
cache	5–13	-0.00	11%	8 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.08	10%	8 May →
cache	6–0	-0.06	14%	7 May →
cache	4–13	-0.04	10%	7 May →
cache	13–8	0.01	9%	7 May →
cache	13–10	-0.02	7%	7 May →
cache	10–13	0.00	15%	7 May →
cache	13–9	-0.06	15%	6 May →
cache	13–10	-0.08	10%	6 May →
cache	12–12	-0.03	16%	6 May →
cache	5–13	0.03	14%	6 May →
cache	9–1	0.04	17%	6 May →
cache	13–4	-0.04	4%	5 May →
cache	9–13	-0.04	15%	5 May →
cache	13–11	0.04	17%	5 May →
cache	13–2	0.08	13%	5 May →
cache	13–11	-0.01	21%	5 May →
cache	3–13	-0.00	12%	4 May →
cache	4–13	-0.06	18%	4 May →
cache	13–3	0.14	19%	4 May →
cache	4–13	-0.07	50%	4 May →
cache	10–13	-0.05	15%	29 Apr →
cache	12–12	0.04	19%	29 Apr →
cache	11–13	0.03	22%	29 Apr →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	47%	28 Apr →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	5%	28 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	22%	25 Apr →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	19%	25 Apr →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	13%	25 Apr →
overpass	13–8	-0.07	21%	24 Apr →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	8%	24 Apr →
overpass	13–9	-0.05	13%	21 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	25%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–1	0.01	10%	16 Apr →
ancient	13–9	0.02	9%	16 Apr →
nuke	15–15	-0.00	10%	16 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	22%	16 Apr →
anubis	13–5	-0.05	11%	15 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	10%	15 Apr →
ancient	1–13	-0.06	24%	15 Apr →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	13%	15 Apr →
nuke	13–3	-0.02	22%	15 Apr →
overpass	13–10	-0.00	15%	15 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.00	9%	14 Apr →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	19%	14 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	6%	13 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	8%	13 Apr →
nuke	16–13	-0.05	17%	12 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	8%	12 Apr →