AceruN

AceruN — CS2 Stats

76561198017933713[U:1:57667985]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

662Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 662 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,775 +608 1 Apr – 29 Apr · 18 days played
17,03918,526peak 18,5261 Apr29 Apr
19,163Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-04-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning62
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateLWLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.0
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.2
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time545ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 14 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–8 · dust2, 14 May →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 24 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 15 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
4–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2511–1444%-0.00
infernoB147–750%0.01
dust2D143–1121%0.00
nukeA149–564%0.03
ancientD124–833%-0.01
anubisS96–367%-0.00
overpassC73–443%-0.04
cache—43–175%0.03
train—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

272Matches
52%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
82.9ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4450%1.1615.2
Dust23450%1.2915.2
Inferno3145%1.2617.2
Anubis3040%1.1614.7
Ancient2167%1.1517.7
Nuke1650%1.4519.4
Train367%1.8218.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
69.7%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
547msReaction time
43.9%T opening success
65.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.13HE damage / grenade
12.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache14–16-0.027%14 Jul →
anubis13–80.0618%14 Jul →
anubis9–130.0324%22 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.087%3 Jun →
train13–110.0121%3 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0116%3 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0219%30 May →
dust27–130.0127%30 May →
ancient16–13-0.0420%28 May →
inferno13–10-0.0017%28 May →
overpass13–10-0.063%24 May →
nuke4–13-0.0433%24 May →
mirage19–22-0.0214%17 May →
inferno1–9-0.0827%14 May →
cache13–20.0913%14 May →
dust21–80.0250%14 May →
nuke13–70.1323%14 May →
ancient16–12-0.0015%13 May →
mirage13–80.0417%12 May →
cache13–100.0119%12 May →
mirage13–60.0217%12 May →
nuke13–160.0333%11 May →
mirage7–130.026%11 May →
mirage10–130.0235%11 May →
cache13–90.0317%11 May →
mirage13–8-0.0114%4 May →
mirage6–13-0.0415%4 May →
ancient14–160.0526%29 Apr →
dust213–70.1129%29 Apr →
overpass1–13-0.0510%29 Apr →
inferno13–40.0124%29 Apr →
nuke16–130.0824%28 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.0014%28 Apr →
nuke10–130.0423%28 Apr →
mirage13–80.0128%27 Apr →
dust212–160.0918%27 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0613%26 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0214%26 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0319%26 Apr →
anubis11–130.0331%26 Apr →
anubis13–100.0727%25 Apr →
mirage13–70.0420%25 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0134%24 Apr →
mirage13–80.0115%24 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0124%24 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0012%24 Apr →
inferno13–80.0613%24 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0622%24 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0213%24 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0017%23 Apr →
mirage13–100.0619%23 Apr →
overpass5–13-0.0414%23 Apr →
ancient5–130.0220%23 Apr →
inferno11–130.0323%23 Apr →
overpass13–6-0.0718%21 Apr →
nuke4–130.0120%21 Apr →
anubis13–7-0.050%19 Apr →
mirage13–5-0.0124%19 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0531%18 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0217%18 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0322%17 Apr →
ancient13–100.026%17 Apr →
inferno13–7-0.0013%17 Apr →
mirage12–160.0123%17 Apr →
dust21–13-0.0419%17 Apr →
ancient13–70.019%17 Apr →
inferno13–100.0826%16 Apr →
mirage15–15-0.0016%16 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.053%16 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.107%16 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0522%16 Apr →
nuke11–130.0219%16 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0626%16 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.0412%15 Apr →
dust22–13-0.0013%15 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0016%15 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.048%15 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0116%15 Apr →
nuke13–00.1122%15 Apr →
ancient0–13-0.0510%15 Apr →
dust24–130.0116%15 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0314%14 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0120%14 Apr →
inferno15–150.0212%14 Apr →
mirage8–130.0025%14 Apr →
mirage13–160.0610%14 Apr →
nuke13–50.0219%14 Apr →
nuke8–2-0.0150%14 Apr →
dust215–150.0625%13 Apr →
nuke13–80.0112%13 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0511%13 Apr →
overpass13–40.0329%13 Apr →
inferno13–60.0426%13 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.019%11 Apr →
mirage10–13-0.0616%11 Apr →
mirage13–110.0312%11 Apr →
nuke13–100.0214%11 Apr →
dust213–90.0318%11 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0514%6 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0014%1 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.