AArnes.

AArnes. — CS2 Stats

NO76561198067794369[U:1:107528641]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

432Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,588Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61464 of 257761 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 432 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,588 +2,998 3 Apr – 22 Oct · 24 days played
18,45322,209peak 22,2093 Apr22 Oct
22,594Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,513Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2025-07-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 621 below peak (22,209)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,412 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAArnes.FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,588 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,513csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning50
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.6pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time588ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy28.0%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · ancient, 16 Apr →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 23 Apr →
414msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 1 May →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2515–1060%0.03
infernoA2113–862%0.01
nukeB158–753%0.01
ancientD124–833%0.02
dust2D113–827%0.00
overpassS97–278%0.01
anubis—42–250%0.00
cache—21–150%-0.02
train—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

129Matches
56%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
74.9ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage683%1.6414.5
Inferno580%0.9313.8
Ancient333%0.9417.3
Nuke1100%0.9018.0
Overpass10%1.0617.0
Vertigo1100%1.5021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.1%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
586msReaction time
20.9%T opening success
59.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
10.39HE damage / grenade
5.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.9443% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–130.0228%3 Jun →
train13–110.0429%3 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0537%3 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0133%3 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0522%30 May →
mirage9–130.0630%30 May →
dust27–130.0137%30 May →
ancient16–130.0227%28 May →
inferno13–100.0433%28 May →
overpass13–100.0524%24 May →
nuke4–13-0.0433%24 May →
inferno3–13-0.0223%24 May →
cache13–100.0228%24 May →
mirage16–13-0.0117%24 May →
mirage13–00.1223%23 May →
nuke7–13-0.0333%3 May →
cache9–13-0.0520%3 May →
dust214–160.0232%1 May →
ancient4–130.0418%1 May →
nuke16–130.0137%28 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0724%26 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0821%26 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0316%26 Apr →
mirage13–110.0415%26 Apr →
nuke13–90.0722%26 Apr →
mirage13–70.0422%25 Apr →
inferno9–40.0441%25 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.0218%25 Apr →
nuke13–70.0239%25 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0131%24 Apr →
inferno13–50.0534%24 Apr →
inferno13–80.0144%23 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0231%23 Apr →
dust29–130.0527%23 Apr →
overpass13–10.1119%23 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0339%23 Apr →
overpass13–11-0.0728%22 Apr →
dust213–10.0429%22 Apr →
anubis3–10.0029%22 Apr →
nuke13–40.0328%22 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0221%22 Apr →
inferno13–20.0430%22 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0419%21 Apr →
overpass13–6-0.0018%21 Apr →
nuke4–130.0113%21 Apr →
inferno14–16-0.0333%21 Apr →
inferno9–5-0.0425%21 Apr →
ancient12–160.0218%18 Apr →
dust26–130.0115%17 Apr →
inferno13–100.0136%16 Apr →
ancient13–90.1335%16 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0023%16 Apr →
anubis13–100.0329%15 Apr →
dust22–13-0.0832%15 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0225%15 Apr →
ancient10–130.0418%15 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0123%14 Apr →
nuke13–70.0122%14 Apr →
inferno15–150.0629%14 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0220%14 Apr →
dust215–150.0223%13 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.0016%13 Apr →
mirage13–90.0822%13 Apr →
overpass13–4-0.0123%13 Apr →
inferno13–60.1033%13 Apr →
ancient9–130.0121%12 Apr →
overpass13–80.0919%12 Apr →
ancient13–100.0315%12 Apr →
mirage10–130.0113%12 Apr →
nuke9–130.0323%12 Apr →
mirage13–70.0829%12 Apr →
nuke11–130.0023%12 Apr →
mirage13–50.0915%11 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0025%11 Apr →
mirage10–130.0016%11 Apr →
mirage13–110.0727%11 Apr →
mirage13–160.0528%8 Apr →
inferno13–110.0532%8 Apr →
mirage13–110.0320%8 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0213%8 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0341%8 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0410%8 Apr →
dust213–60.0324%8 Apr →
anubis14–16-0.0115%7 Apr →
mirage13–4-0.0122%7 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0532%7 Apr →
overpass8–13-0.0318%7 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0327%7 Apr →
dust213–50.0331%6 Apr →
inferno13–110.0427%5 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0331%5 Apr →
ancient7–130.0629%5 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0134%5 Apr →
inferno12–16-0.0421%4 Apr →
inferno13–80.0819%3 Apr →
mirage13–70.0926%3 Apr →
nuke13–30.1036%3 Apr →
mirage14–160.0729%3 Apr →
overpass13–80.0632%3 Apr →
mirage13–70.0133%3 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.