KIAEddZ — CS2 Stats

SG76561198016524586[U:1:56258858]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,044Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

7,936Hours in CS65Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player

Premier CS Rating22,475Top 25% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#48468 of 251442 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,392 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,475 -1,592 10 Sept – 10 Oct · 5 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,392 +0 10 Sept – 21 Sept · 2 observations

24,067Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,392Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

20Days played since 2026-09-10

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,392
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 139 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-09-10
Level 6 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

1,592 below peak (24,067)
-1,592 over 30 days · declining
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,525 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-09-10
Purple band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	156	—	—
Win rate	42%	—	—
K/D	0.74	—	—
Headshot %	45%	—	—

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	38.0%	43.7%	44.8%	6.8% short
Shot accuracy	14.9%	12.0%	12.4%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.87	1.02	1.03	0.16 short
Match win rate	45.1%	44.7%	45.2%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning40

Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–57–1Last 10042%Win rateWLWLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 12%
Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

9–10–1 · 45% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.4

Utility2.4

Positioning4.0

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.0

Utility2.4

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels0.2

Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time603ms−7ms

first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms

Headshot accuracy12.6%−2.5%

first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 3 Oct →

32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 4 Oct →

391msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 6 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · anubis, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak

4–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 30mirageWeakest map · 28% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	30	15–15	50%	-0.00
mirage	D	18	5–13	28%	-0.04
ancient	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.04
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.04
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.05
dust2	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.05
nuke	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

120,293Lifetime kills

0.87K/D

6,974Matches

45.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

38.0%Headshot %

14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

10,991MVPs

3,052Hours (in match)

6,886Bombs planted

1,188Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,037

M4A4 / M4A1-S25,979

AWP14,268

P907,336

P2000 / USP-S5,643

UMP-454,446

Galil AR4,403

Glock-184,223

FAMAS3,225

MP92,641

Lifetime map wins

16,713inferno

8,946dust2

1,669nuke

1,261cbble

1,169train

646vertigo

156office

121dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

819Matches

52%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

59.1ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

15%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	156	59%	0.82	11.8
Mirage	111	49%	0.67	10.5
Anubis	69	57%	0.74	10.3
Ancient	48	52%	0.70	11.8
Cache	45	60%	0.71	11.0
Dust2	43	37%	0.65	11.4
Nuke	19	53%	0.75	12.4
Overpass	11	27%	0.66	11.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy

32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.3%Spray accuracy

77.3%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

587msReaction time

31.4%T opening success

26.9%CT opening success

0.31Enemies flashed / flash

1.1%Flash assists

6.88HE damage / grenade

1.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.5127% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3076 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.3988% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–6	0.05	20%	13 Oct →
vertigo	1–13	-0.11	0%	13 Oct →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	9%	13 Oct →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	20%	13 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.06	19%	12 Oct →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	9%	12 Oct →
mirage	8–13	0.01	15%	12 Oct →
cache	13–4	0.05	14%	12 Oct →
ancient	17–19	-0.07	9%	11 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	2%	11 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.04	18%	11 Oct →
inferno	12–12	0.03	20%	11 Oct →
ancient	6–13	0.03	19%	11 Oct →
inferno	13–2	0.07	23%	10 Oct →
anubis	14–16	-0.04	21%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	26%	10 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	12%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	12%	10 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.10	6%	10 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	7%	10 Oct →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	17%	9 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	3%	9 Oct →
anubis	12–16	-0.08	9%	9 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.06	8%	9 Oct →
anubis	13–8	-0.06	8%	9 Oct →
ancient	9–13	0.01	13%	9 Oct →
inferno	4–13	-0.12	0%	9 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.01	11%	9 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.00	10%	9 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	13%	8 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	21%	8 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.10	12%	8 Oct →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	15%	8 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.01	11%	8 Oct →
cache	8–13	-0.10	8%	7 Oct →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	19%	7 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.04	23%	7 Oct →
inferno	19–22	-0.03	15%	6 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	16%	6 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.01	19%	6 Oct →
inferno	13–3	0.05	12%	6 Oct →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	12%	6 Oct →
inferno	5–13	0.01	16%	6 Oct →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	7%	6 Oct →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	11%	5 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	14%	5 Oct →
anubis	16–13	-0.09	16%	5 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.03	11%	5 Oct →
dust2	3–13	-0.11	14%	4 Oct →
cache	14–16	-0.04	13%	4 Oct →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	32%	4 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	16%	4 Oct →
mirage	13–10	0.00	19%	4 Oct →
inferno	13–11	0.04	25%	4 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	17%	3 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	21%	3 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.02	20%	3 Oct →
anubis	13–1	0.03	27%	3 Oct →
inferno	13–5	-0.03	18%	3 Oct →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	13%	3 Oct →
ancient	13–6	-0.10	12%	3 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.06	18%	3 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.11	14%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.04	19%	3 Oct →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	20%	2 Oct →
inferno	10–13	0.04	21%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–5	0.04	30%	30 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.06	13%	29 Sept →
ancient	13–9	-0.10	9%	29 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	11%	29 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	10%	29 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	20%	28 Sept →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	27%	28 Sept →
mirage	14–16	-0.07	20%	28 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.04	11%	28 Sept →
inferno	8–13	0.03	20%	28 Sept →
nuke	16–19	0.00	17%	27 Sept →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	11%	27 Sept →
cache	13–5	-0.00	27%	27 Sept →
dust2	13–16	-0.08	13%	27 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	9%	26 Sept →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	4%	26 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	18%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	21%	26 Sept →
mirage	13–3	-0.03	16%	26 Sept →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	0%	26 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	21%	25 Sept →
cache	13–10	-0.06	14%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–2	-0.03	9%	25 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	9%	25 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	15%	25 Sept →
cache	13–8	-0.08	13%	25 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	13%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	26%	25 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.02	22%	25 Sept →
anubis	6–13	0.03	12%	25 Sept →
dust2	0–13	-0.06	19%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	18%	24 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.02	10%	24 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	24%	23 Sept →