baun

baun — CS2 Stats

76561198015159616[U:1:54893888]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,379Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since
3,365Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,191Purple band · top ~15.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,191 +4,422 31 Aug – 14 Nov · 27 days played
13,76918,861peak 18,86131 Aug14 Nov
19,230Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 670 below peak (18,861)
  • +999 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,809 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,631), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate46.7%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy8.1%12.0%12.4%4.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.021.030.13 short
Match win rate45.0%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbaunFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,191 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning62
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateLWLLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.0
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 76% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 76% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning6.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time546ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 22 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · cache, 3 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 29 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 13 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 11mirageWeakest map · 25% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD205–1525%0.02
cacheA169–756%0.02
dust2C156–940%0.01
nukeS1510–567%0.01
infernoS119–282%0.02
anubisA116–555%0.02
ancientA116–555%0.03
shelter—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 20). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,831Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,586Matches
45.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8.1%Shot accuracy
7,535MVPs
1,543Hours (in match)
2,531Bombs planted
817Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,813
AWP6,537
SCAR-202,004
MP71,903
Tec-91,766
SSG 081,564

Lifetime map wins

8,557dust2
4,511inferno
2,269nuke
659train
369cbble
365vertigo
113italy
109office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
47%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
79.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21040%1.0815.0
Mirage743%1.1113.6
Inferno729%1.1012.7
Ancient4100%1.0814.8
Anubis367%0.9713.7
Cache20%0.8715.5
Overpass250%0.8012.0
Nuke1100%1.3013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
64.0%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
559msReaction time
75.7%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.69HE damage / grenade
12.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.6155% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0518%14 Nov →
inferno13–90.0110%14 Nov →
dust213–16-0.0322%14 Nov →
mirage10–130.0614%14 Nov →
nuke13–80.0418%14 Nov →
nuke13–50.0519%14 Nov →
cache13–100.0415%14 Nov →
anubis13–110.019%13 Nov →
mirage3–130.0123%13 Nov →
inferno13–00.0425%13 Nov →
nuke13–80.0528%13 Nov →
mirage13–90.1217%12 Nov →
inferno13–60.0517%12 Nov →
ancient13–100.0616%12 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0021%12 Nov →
nuke13–16-0.0320%6 Nov →
inferno13–100.0812%6 Nov →
cache10–130.0526%6 Nov →
dust213–50.1028%6 Nov →
mirage4–130.0113%6 Nov →
anubis3–13-0.0525%5 Nov →
nuke13–80.0520%5 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0426%5 Nov →
dust216–14-0.0213%2 Nov →
anubis9–130.0212%2 Nov →
anubis14–160.0619%1 Nov →
anubis13–60.0012%1 Nov →
dust20–10-0.1114%31 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0013%31 Oct →
nuke13–90.0312%31 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0218%31 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.018%31 Oct →
inferno13–40.0413%31 Oct →
dust213–110.0416%31 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.039%29 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0325%29 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0110%28 Oct →
ancient9–130.0113%27 Oct →
shelter4–130.0339%27 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0518%23 Oct →
mirage15–150.0118%23 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0020%23 Oct →
ancient8–130.0417%22 Oct →
cache13–50.0828%22 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0324%22 Oct →
inferno13–30.1119%22 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0218%22 Oct →
anubis13–00.1811%22 Oct →
mirage14–160.0520%21 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0216%21 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0613%20 Oct →
anubis13–90.0019%20 Oct →
dust27–130.0632%20 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0424%20 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0316%20 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0513%19 Oct →
nuke13–60.0319%19 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0126%19 Oct →
inferno13–70.0326%19 Oct →
anubis13–30.0819%19 Oct →
cache13–70.0934%19 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.048%18 Oct →
ancient13–10.0518%18 Oct →
anubis3–130.0024%18 Oct →
mirage13–30.0218%18 Oct →
dust213–40.0524%18 Oct →
cache8–130.0110%17 Oct →
ancient13–10.0919%17 Oct →
nuke13–80.0522%17 Oct →
mirage13–160.0518%17 Oct →
cache2–130.0428%17 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0518%17 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0216%17 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0123%17 Oct →
nuke11–130.0324%16 Oct →
cache13–100.0213%16 Oct →
dust213–20.0118%16 Oct →
ancient13–30.1013%16 Oct →
mirage13–100.0616%16 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0414%16 Oct →
dust213–80.0423%13 Oct →
ancient13–110.0121%13 Oct →
cache11–130.0628%13 Oct →
dust25–130.0322%11 Oct →
mirage13–90.1013%11 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0022%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0016%10 Oct →
dust215–150.0518%10 Oct →
mirage4–130.0220%10 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0011%10 Oct →
cache13–60.0231%10 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0214%10 Oct →
nuke13–40.0219%10 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0328%10 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0833%7 Oct →
cache13–50.0215%7 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0713%6 Oct →
ancient7–130.0019%6 Oct →
mirage10–130.0632%6 Oct →
cache7–130.0243%3 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.