MeDIuM™

MeDIuM™ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198014840427[U:1:54574699]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,102Tracked matches40%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,086Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating11,258Blue band · top ~48.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+725Premier CS Rating · 10,533 → 11,258
+1Tracked matches · now 1,102
+3.3ppWin rate · 36.7% → 40.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,533 -100 8 Aug – 25 Oct · 24 days played
10,44012,550peak 12,5508 Aug25 Oct
12,597Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-08-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,292 below peak (12,550)
  • +771 over 30 days · improving
  • +625 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,742 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-25
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-10-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.1%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy15.5%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.021.03meets
Match win rate41.0%44.7%45.2%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMeDIuM™FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,258 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–50–12Last 10038%Win rateWLTLLLTLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.08 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 10

  • 1–7–2 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 4–13–3 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility6.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time626ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 9 Aug →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · poseidon, 11 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 5poseidonWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C208–1240%-0.00
infernoB115–645%0.04
vertigoD113–827%0.04
nukeA117–464%0.03
eldoradoC94–544%0.04
anubisD71–614%0.00
cacheC73–443%0.03
debrisD61–517%0.05
poseidonD60–60%-0.06
mirageS54–180%0.01
ancient—41–325%-0.01
overpass—31–233%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

65,572Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,713Matches
41.0%Match win rate
44.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
15.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
8,058MVPs
1,193Hours (in match)
4,646Bombs planted
674Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

MP79,709
AWP7,113
P906,817
AK-476,728
UMP-453,265
Tec-91,670

Lifetime map wins

9,803dust2
2,406inferno
1,524nuke
1,305cbble
826vertigo
560train
257office
229lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

261Matches
46%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
89.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28951%1.2017.4
Anubis4751%1.1918.6
Mirage4448%1.0415.5
Cache3152%1.1618.4
Ancient1822%0.8614.2
Nuke1625%1.2619.6
Inferno850%1.3714.1
Overpass30%0.8215.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
14.5°Preaim
640msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
13.70HE damage / grenade
7.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 14.4686° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0416%24 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0418%2 Oct →
debris8–80.0729%26 Sept →
anubis8–130.0118%21 Sept →
dust210–130.0313%19 Sept →
dust26–13-0.025%18 Sept →
eldorado8–8-0.0214%11 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.1167%11 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.169%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.019%10 Sept →
eldorado5–90.1932%10 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0732%10 Sept →
debris7–90.0514%10 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.1311%9 Sept →
nuke13–90.0719%9 Sept →
vertigo5–90.0811%9 Sept →
eldorado9–40.2119%8 Sept →
inferno13–80.0815%8 Sept →
dust25–130.0117%8 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0227%8 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.018%8 Sept →
debris8–80.059%8 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.060%8 Sept →
eldorado6–9-0.0933%8 Sept →
vertigo9–30.0517%8 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0228%7 Sept →
dust25–130.1118%7 Sept →
eldorado9–7-0.016%7 Sept →
vertigo9–40.0321%7 Sept →
anubis13–160.0216%7 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0010%7 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0123%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.105%7 Sept →
eldorado8–80.0518%6 Sept →
dust21–13-0.100%6 Sept →
eldorado9–5-0.0629%6 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.180%6 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0216%6 Sept →
overpass7–9-0.0515%6 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0229%6 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.0929%6 Sept →
inferno9–50.0535%6 Sept →
inferno11–40.0312%5 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0113%5 Sept →
anubis13–60.0713%5 Sept →
cache13–10.1414%5 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0311%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0125%2 Sept →
cache13–110.0621%1 Sept →
ancient14–160.049%31 Aug →
cache13–70.0212%31 Aug →
nuke3–130.0216%31 Aug →
nuke13–90.0727%30 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0412%30 Aug →
nuke13–70.0315%29 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.048%29 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0317%29 Aug →
anubis2–13-0.057%28 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0110%28 Aug →
cache15–15-0.049%28 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0819%28 Aug →
cache7–130.0517%27 Aug →
mirage13–110.0729%26 Aug →
anubis9–130.0217%26 Aug →
vertigo8–8-0.0017%26 Aug →
vertigo9–20.2323%25 Aug →
poseidon8–80.0536%25 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0111%24 Aug →
dust213–100.0114%24 Aug →
mirage13–110.0014%23 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.170%22 Aug →
vertigo8–80.0720%22 Aug →
nuke9–60.0819%22 Aug →
dust213–80.0129%16 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0120%15 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0316%15 Aug →
nuke7–130.0118%15 Aug →
ancient3–130.0020%15 Aug →
eldorado4–9-0.0315%14 Aug →
debris5–90.0416%13 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0713%13 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0315%13 Aug →
overpass9–70.1122%11 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.2133%11 Aug →
inferno8–80.1533%11 Aug →
eldorado9–70.1013%11 Aug →
debris9–60.1330%11 Aug →
poseidon8–80.1129%11 Aug →
debris5–9-0.0139%9 Aug →
overpass6–90.0516%9 Aug →
inferno9–20.2423%9 Aug →
nuke9–10.2318%9 Aug →
vertigo7–90.0823%9 Aug →
inferno9–20.1731%9 Aug →
dust213–110.0421%9 Aug →
nuke13–50.1033%9 Aug →
dust213–80.1117%9 Aug →
nuke13–100.0323%8 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0625%8 Aug →
dust213–100.0519%8 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.