Petertriceps

Petertriceps — CS2 Stats

SE76561198014415801[U:1:54150073]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,428Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,352Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,685 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,685 → 1,685
+37Tracked matches · now 1,428
−1.7ppWin rate · 50.0% → 48.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 17 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,608 +235 17 Jan12 Apr · 10 days played
21,37322,358peak 22,35817 Jan12 Apr
Faceit ELO: 1,685 +0 29 Aug6 Sept · 3 observations
1,6851,685peak 1,68529 Aug6 Sept
22,759Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,685Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-01-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,685
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 66 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches42
Win rate55%
K/D0.92
Headshot %47%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,804), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate38.5%48.3%51.0%12.5% short
Shot accuracy12.5%13.2%13.7%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.071.09above
Match win rate48.2%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPetertricepsFACEITLevel 9 · 1,685 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,685csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning58
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48502Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLLTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility6.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 59% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.8
Utility6.7
Mechanics3.2
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time556ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · vertigo, 17 Sept
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · ancient, 13 Mar
406msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 22 Aug
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 27 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1910953%-0.00
mirageC1971237%-0.00
dust2C156940%-0.02
ancientC146843%-0.02
nukeS128467%-0.00
anubisB126650%0.01
overpassB63350%0.01
cache21150%0.01
vertigo110100%0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,660Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
4,365Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
38.5%Headshot %
12.5%Shot accuracy
9,798MVPs
2,064Hours (in match)
2,914Bombs planted
1,311Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,647
AWP14,091
MAC-103,903
MP93,589
P2502,817
Tec-92,059

Lifetime map wins

8,367inferno
4,373train
3,943dust2
2,199nuke
483vertigo
316cbble
17lake
16ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

529Matches
53%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
81.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13552%1.0716.2
Inferno8850%1.0816.2
Anubis6746%1.2915.4
Ancient6157%1.1616.0
Nuke5060%1.1816.9
Dust24657%1.0114.8
Overpass4267%1.1517.0
Vertigo1040%1.3518.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
30.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
64.4%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
552msReaction time
43.9%T opening success
42.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
6.94HE damage / grenade
15.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.2777° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0529%19 Sept
nuke19–16-0.0011%18 Sept
vertigo13–50.1813%17 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0211%14 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0119%13 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0413%13 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0113%13 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0520%10 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0732%10 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0831%10 Sept
dust25–13-0.0432%10 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0321%2 Sept
anubis13–100.0123%27 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0017%27 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0019%27 Aug
cache10–130.0117%27 Aug
anubis10–130.0016%23 Aug
nuke13–60.0925%23 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0217%23 Aug
ancient13–70.0318%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0028%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0532%21 Jul
mirage16–120.0624%18 Jul
dust22–13-0.100%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0115%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0229%18 Jul
cache13–70.0215%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0215%18 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0720%25 Apr
inferno4–13-0.1026%25 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0912%25 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0412%12 Apr
ancient13–40.0221%12 Apr
inferno7–130.0518%5 Apr
dust210–13-0.0224%5 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0115%5 Apr
anubis13–100.0619%5 Apr
overpass13–80.0413%5 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0119%5 Apr
anubis13–90.0520%28 Mar
mirage13–2-0.0210%27 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0523%27 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0119%27 Mar
ancient13–110.0324%27 Mar
ancient16–12-0.0219%27 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0119%15 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0313%15 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0325%14 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0412%14 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0125%14 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0217%14 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0537%13 Mar
inferno13–70.0230%13 Mar
mirage13–50.0013%13 Mar
ancient13–110.0119%13 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0417%7 Mar
overpass11–13-0.047%7 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0523%28 Feb
nuke13–4-0.0116%27 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0117%27 Feb
dust27–13-0.0122%27 Feb
overpass9–130.0518%15 Feb
anubis13–70.0417%8 Feb
inferno13–70.0822%7 Feb
mirage5–130.0117%7 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0118%7 Feb
overpass13–60.0422%7 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0118%7 Feb
dust213–8-0.0021%7 Feb
ancient2–130.0411%7 Feb
dust216–13-0.0614%6 Feb
mirage13–100.0122%6 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0323%6 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0224%1 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0716%1 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0317%1 Feb
dust215–15-0.0215%1 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0026%1 Feb
overpass13–5-0.0219%1 Feb
anubis13–80.1027%1 Feb
mirage10–130.0119%31 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0117%31 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0218%31 Jan
dust213–100.0326%31 Jan
dust210–13-0.0427%31 Jan
dust213–80.0029%31 Jan
inferno13–30.1022%31 Jan
nuke13–6-0.0031%31 Jan
dust213–70.1027%31 Jan
nuke13–110.0117%30 Jan
anubis9–130.0717%30 Jan
dust27–13-0.0515%30 Jan
dust27–130.0321%30 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0216%25 Jan
mirage10–130.1414%24 Jan
inferno13–30.0315%24 Jan
anubis13–7-0.0320%24 Jan
mirage12–16-0.0620%18 Jan
ancient14–160.0119%17 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0125%17 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →