Nidelix

Nidelix — CS2 Stats

76561198013953021[U:1:53687293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,994Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,649Purple band · top ~25.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19186 of 32000 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,210 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNidelixFACEITLevel 6 · 1,210 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,649 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning36
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression2.9
Utility6.1
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning3.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time580ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — nuke 13–7
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 16cacheWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB1991047%0.01
dust2A1710759%-0.02
nukeA1610663%-0.01
ancientC135838%-0.01
cacheD124833%-0.04
infernoC114736%-0.00
vertigoA85363%-0.02
train42250%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,086Matches
50%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
69.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9451%1.1314.1
Nuke9153%0.9313.4
Anubis7954%0.9313.9
Inferno7353%1.0115.4
Dust27240%0.7912.6
Cache3135%0.8614.1
Mirage2843%0.9013.8
Overpass2370%0.8212.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
39.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
68.9%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
585msReaction time
19.4%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.07HE damage / grenade
13.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.3955% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–8-0.0227%23 Aug
train9–13-0.0319%23 Aug
nuke13–100.0322%22 Aug
dust216–13-0.0222%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.068%22 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0510%21 Aug
anubis13–20.0615%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0127%21 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0118%21 Aug
ancient5–130.0124%20 Aug
dust213–80.0218%20 Aug
vertigo16–19-0.078%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.0516%20 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0112%20 Aug
dust213–60.018%20 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0122%20 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0511%19 Aug
dust28–13-0.0411%19 Aug
anubis13–60.0319%19 Aug
inferno13–40.0412%18 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0822%18 Aug
anubis10–130.0314%18 Aug
anubis10–130.026%18 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0225%18 Aug
nuke13–60.0225%18 Aug
vertigo13–110.0218%17 Aug
anubis13–90.0416%17 Aug
ancient11–130.0221%17 Aug
inferno11–130.0422%16 Aug
train13–40.0714%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.0125%16 Aug
dust213–2-0.0528%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.038%15 Aug
anubis11–130.0624%15 Aug
cache9–13-0.059%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0316%15 Aug
nuke13–110.0117%15 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0113%15 Aug
cache7–13-0.0624%15 Aug
dust216–130.0119%14 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0821%14 Aug
nuke13–100.0127%14 Aug
anubis13–40.0735%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0515%13 Aug
cache4–13-0.094%13 Aug
vertigo13–11-0.047%13 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0110%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0621%13 Aug
dust210–130.0221%13 Aug
cache13–11-0.0115%13 Aug
train12–12-0.0127%13 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0625%12 Aug
ancient14–160.0112%12 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0118%12 Aug
train11–30.0214%12 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.0916%11 Aug
nuke14–16-0.038%11 Aug
inferno8–130.0121%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.0117%10 Aug
nuke10–130.0018%10 Aug
vertigo13–40.069%10 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0324%10 Aug
ancient9–130.0216%10 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0421%10 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0312%10 Aug
nuke13–70.0816%9 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0214%9 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0425%9 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0335%9 Aug
cache13–6-0.0336%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.0219%9 Aug
anubis13–160.0214%7 Aug
vertigo16–13-0.0517%7 Aug
anubis13–3-0.023%7 Aug
inferno9–130.0218%6 Aug
inferno13–80.0213%6 Aug
anubis13–90.0334%6 Aug
dust213–7-0.0612%6 Aug
cache9–130.049%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.017%5 Aug
nuke13–160.0714%5 Aug
cache13–7-0.0410%5 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0118%4 Aug
dust24–13-0.0624%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0519%4 Aug
dust213–6-0.0220%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0516%4 Aug
nuke13–50.0015%4 Aug
inferno13–110.0310%3 Aug
dust219–17-0.0419%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0611%3 Aug
dust24–13-0.078%3 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0415%3 Aug
cache13–9-0.067%2 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0212%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0016%2 Aug
cache7–13-0.0117%2 Aug
dust213–110.0116%2 Aug
anubis13–40.0313%2 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0017%2 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →