tzatziki uchica

tzatziki uchica — CS2 Stats

FI76561198012934026[U:1:52668298]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,392Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,598Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,882Top 25% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22368 of 231737 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,392 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,882 +1,792 9 May19 Sept · 32 days played
23,09025,003peak 25,0039 May19 Sept
25,113Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-05-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 121 below peak (25,003)
  • +618 over 30 days · improving
  • +168 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 118 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches212−10
Win rate100%75%+25pp
K/D1.000.88+0.12
Headshot %60%44%+16pp

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.4%46.8%48.3%meets
Shot accuracy18.1%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.891.061.070.18 short
Match win rate53.2%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtzatziki uchicaFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,882 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time568ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 10 May
38%Best headshot accuracy · 16–14 · anubis, 29 May
398msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 5 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 21 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 77% over 13mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2011955%0.00
ancientA1710759%0.00
anubisB157847%-0.01
infernoB136746%-0.02
cacheS1310377%0.02
mirageD113827%-0.01
dust2B84450%0.00
overpass330100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

155,723Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
5,782Matches
53.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 8 players
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
18.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 8 players
14,448MVPs
3,461Hours (in match)
7,050Bombs planted
1,494Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4761,689
AWP7,381
P2504,585
FAMAS2,912
Knife2,232

Lifetime map wins

11,752dust2
8,442inferno
7,529nuke
5,831train
1,827cbble
1,694vertigo
88lake
61stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,840Matches
54%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
83.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1968%1.0114.8
Ancient1765%1.2817.5
Anubis1567%1.0615.1
Mirage1155%1.0814.9
Cache989%1.2016.6
Dust2540%0.9816.6
Vertigo450%1.0315.5
Inferno450%1.4219.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
557msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
9.80HE damage / grenade
9.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.491 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9978% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–13-0.0813%11 Sept
cache13–10.0124%11 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0322%11 Sept
ancient16–12-0.0319%8 Sept
cache13–7-0.0013%8 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0616%5 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0329%4 Sept
inferno10–13-0.066%4 Sept
nuke13–50.0124%4 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0521%4 Sept
nuke13–100.0121%4 Sept
anubis13–60.0210%1 Sept
dust216–120.0019%1 Sept
ancient13–80.0020%1 Sept
nuke11–130.0113%1 Sept
ancient19–17-0.0418%27 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0416%25 Aug
ancient13–30.0231%25 Aug
dust211–130.0318%25 Aug
cache13–9-0.0310%8 Aug
ancient14–160.0125%3 Aug
anubis8–130.0422%1 Aug
nuke13–110.0018%22 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0021%21 Jul
anubis9–130.0217%21 Jul
cache13–00.0827%21 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0120%20 Jul
ancient13–90.0620%20 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0616%20 Jul
nuke9–130.0222%19 Jul
cache13–40.0614%19 Jul
nuke10–130.0017%18 Jul
cache13–30.0931%18 Jul
inferno13–30.0231%18 Jul
dust213–110.0121%18 Jul
cache13–40.0421%18 Jul
dust213–50.0315%18 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0426%18 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0515%15 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0321%15 Jul
inferno5–130.0219%15 Jul
cache15–150.0318%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0018%13 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0923%12 Jul
cache9–13-0.0630%12 Jul
inferno13–30.0319%12 Jul
cache13–70.0121%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0331%12 Jul
nuke7–130.0424%11 Jul
ancient15–150.0825%11 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0114%9 Jul
cache13–20.0712%9 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0220%5 Jul
nuke13–80.1222%5 Jul
overpass13–10.0113%5 Jul
dust213–160.0230%3 Jul
mirage13–50.0235%3 Jul
anubis15–15-0.038%1 Jul
dust213–5-0.0514%27 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0317%27 Jun
dust213–160.0114%22 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0218%21 Jun
nuke16–120.0421%21 Jun
ancient13–110.0017%20 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0316%16 Jun
anubis6–0-0.0215%16 Jun
ancient13–100.0135%11 Jun
ancient12–16-0.0326%29 May
nuke13–90.0519%29 May
anubis16–14-0.0338%29 May
ancient16–13-0.0011%25 May
nuke13–110.0118%25 May
mirage13–110.0421%25 May
ancient11–13-0.028%22 May
anubis10–13-0.0512%22 May
cache13–50.0624%22 May
mirage9–13-0.0333%22 May
nuke1–2-0.0020%20 May
mirage0–3-0.090%20 May
nuke13–70.0318%16 May
inferno8–10.0017%16 May
inferno1–13-0.110%16 May
overpass13–110.0114%16 May
inferno13–50.0122%11 May
ancient13–7-0.0318%11 May
mirage11–13-0.0120%11 May
nuke13–6-0.0221%11 May
anubis13–90.0118%10 May
mirage8–130.0214%10 May
anubis13–00.1322%10 May
nuke1–13-0.0629%10 May
cache9–13-0.0822%10 May
ancient11–13-0.0324%9 May
mirage13–100.0222%9 May
overpass13–70.1022%9 May
nuke11–13-0.0417%9 May
ancient13–30.0810%9 May
inferno10–130.0218%9 May
dust210–13-0.0519%9 May
mirage7–13-0.0113%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →