inai

inai — CS2 Stats

FI76561198000274106[U:1:40008378]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,400Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,679Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,854 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,854 → 1,854
+6Tracked matches · now 1,400
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 1 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,086 +2,193 1 Mar5 Jul · 23 days played
19,28722,285peak 22,2851 Mar5 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,854 +0 30 Aug14 Sept · 2 observations
1,8541,854peak 1,85430 Aug14 Sept
22,454Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,854Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-03-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,854
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 147 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches411−7
Win rate100%45%+55pp
K/D0.493.59−3.09
Headshot %48%67%−19pp

Measured 14 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 14 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate57.2%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy15.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.341.061.07above
Match win rate41.5%46.3%46.9%5.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGinaiFACEITLevel 8 · 1,854 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,854csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning63
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49465Last 10049%Win rateWWLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.8
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.4

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.3
Utility5.8
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time611ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–1 · overpass, 5 Jul
67%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · anubis, 16 Jun
438msFastest reaction time · 8–1 · inferno, 16 May
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 5 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB189950%-0.02
anubisC167944%-0.00
ancientB157847%0.01
nukeS1510567%0.02
mirageD113827%-0.01
dust2C94544%0.01
infernoD72529%0.00
overpassS65183%0.06
train220100%-0.04
vertigo1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

145,758Lifetime kills
1.34K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
3,682Matches
41.5%Match win rate
57.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6,952MVPs
2,090Hours (in match)
3,312Bombs planted
869Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,109inferno
4,364nuke
4,254dust2
1,552train
723vertigo
248cbble
147bank
146italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

493Matches
52%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
78.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4455%1.3919.1
Ancient3250%1.2217.2
Anubis3057%1.2216.3
Dust22536%1.0916.2
Inferno2060%1.3216.4
Nuke2060%1.1316.4
Cache1173%1.1014.4
Overpass956%1.3216.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
599msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
7.53HE damage / grenade
8.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8014% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–12-0.0315%8 Sept
cache13–7-0.0517%8 Sept
anubis8–130.0223%4 Sept
nuke13–100.0711%4 Sept
ancient19–17-0.0117%27 Aug
cache3–13-0.0120%22 Aug
nuke19–170.0516%16 Aug
cache13–11-0.0419%15 Aug
anubis13–4-0.019%15 Aug
cache13–5-0.0129%14 Aug
train13–7-0.0522%14 Aug
train13–5-0.0318%14 Aug
inferno6–130.0115%8 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0224%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0136%15 Jul
anubis8–13-0.035%15 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0228%15 Jul
cache15–15-0.0116%13 Jul
anubis10–13-0.048%13 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0426%12 Jul
dust213–7-0.0614%12 Jul
cache9–13-0.038%12 Jul
inferno13–30.0440%12 Jul
cache13–70.0225%12 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0431%12 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0122%9 Jul
cache13–20.0616%9 Jul
ancient10–130.0014%5 Jul
nuke13–80.0316%5 Jul
overpass13–10.2730%5 Jul
overpass13–110.0313%4 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0021%4 Jul
nuke2–4-0.0338%4 Jul
overpass13–100.0217%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0317%4 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0115%2 Jul
cache6–13-0.0619%2 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0217%1 Jul
anubis4–13-0.077%1 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0119%30 Jun
dust213–20.0213%30 Jun
ancient13–40.0311%30 Jun
dust213–50.0126%27 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0015%27 Jun
dust210–13-0.0331%26 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0516%23 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0342%23 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0320%16 Jun
nuke8–13-0.037%16 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0216%16 Jun
anubis6–00.1167%16 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.1117%28 May
cache12–12-0.056%28 May
anubis13–16-0.0111%28 May
cache4–13-0.0515%26 May
ancient6–13-0.0412%23 May
cache13–110.0129%16 May
mirage10–130.0218%16 May
nuke13–7-0.0420%16 May
inferno8–10.1129%16 May
inferno1–13-0.110%16 May
overpass13–11-0.0524%16 May
anubis13–90.0017%10 May
mirage8–13-0.0212%10 May
cache6–130.0119%9 May
dust214–160.0511%8 May
mirage13–10.0221%8 May
anubis11–130.068%8 May
cache12–12-0.0417%8 May
cache13–70.0824%7 May
dust213–160.0419%6 May
cache13–11-0.0911%4 May
cache10–13-0.0521%4 May
nuke13–100.0620%3 May
cache13–60.0419%29 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0015%25 Apr
dust24–13-0.0211%25 Apr
ancient15–150.0722%24 Apr
mirage13–160.0118%22 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0119%21 Apr
dust213–50.0218%18 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0015%18 Apr
nuke16–13-0.0013%18 Apr
nuke3–13-0.0027%17 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0536%10 Apr
inferno11–130.0020%10 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0119%28 Mar
overpass13–70.1119%24 Mar
anubis8–130.0221%24 Mar
dust26–130.0115%24 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0031%24 Mar
nuke13–10.0631%21 Mar
ancient13–40.1017%21 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0013%20 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0018%12 Mar
mirage13–30.0010%12 Mar
nuke11–130.0617%12 Mar
ancient13–50.1013%3 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0331%1 Mar
nuke13–30.0723%1 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →