n1cce

n1cce — CS2 Stats

76561198010531109[U:1:50265381]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,471Tracked matches40%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,029Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#72106 of 222109 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,697 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 19 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,029 +29 19 May17 Sept · 17 days played
19,33222,659peak 22,65919 May17 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,697 +0 2 Sept17 Sept · 2 observations
1,6971,697peak 1,6972 Sept17 Sept
22,913Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,697Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-05-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,697
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 54 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,630 below peak (22,659)
  • +697 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,971 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGn1cceFACEITLevel 8 · 1,697 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,029 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,697csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning57
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44533Last 10044%Win rateWLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.7
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time514ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 19 May
41%Best headshot accuracy · 7–4 · dust2, 24 May
383msFastest reaction time · 1–8 · dust2, 19 May
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 25ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA25151060%0.01
dust2D2481633%-0.01
infernoB2091145%0.00
mirageB147750%0.00
ancientD82625%0.03
cacheD72529%-0.01
anubis21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

551Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
75.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke7952%1.1215.7
Inferno7952%1.0916.8
Dust25553%1.0114.8
Ancient5044%1.0616.6
Mirage2241%0.9413.7
Overpass1856%1.0316.4
Cache888%1.1016.5
Anubis540%0.9814.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
513msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
34.5%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.25HE damage / grenade
9.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7581% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–6-0.0117%17 Sept
dust26–13-0.0334%17 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0111%16 Sept
inferno13–60.0334%16 Sept
cache13–100.0324%16 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0738%14 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0717%13 Sept
inferno19–160.0420%13 Sept
dust213–6-0.056%13 Sept
dust28–13-0.0720%12 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0827%11 Sept
dust29–13-0.0016%11 Sept
nuke13–1-0.0322%11 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0518%11 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0224%11 Sept
dust216–140.0117%10 Sept
cache4–13-0.0213%10 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0328%10 Sept
inferno5–130.0827%9 Sept
cache8–13-0.0121%9 Sept
ancient13–30.0216%9 Sept
mirage13–20.0926%8 Sept
dust22–13-0.0227%8 Sept
inferno14–160.0113%8 Sept
nuke13–90.0329%7 Sept
ancient13–80.0414%7 Sept
mirage13–8-0.027%7 Sept
cache6–13-0.0224%6 Sept
dust25–130.0120%6 Sept
nuke3–13-0.084%6 Sept
inferno5–130.0315%6 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0229%5 Sept
nuke5–13-0.066%5 Sept
dust27–130.0116%5 Sept
inferno13–80.0924%5 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0127%5 Sept
cache7–13-0.0213%5 Sept
mirage13–10.0218%5 Sept
inferno13–60.0724%4 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0514%3 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0324%2 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0226%2 Sept
dust213–50.0116%2 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0519%1 Sept
nuke13–70.1229%1 Sept
ancient10–130.1115%31 Aug
inferno16–140.0426%31 Aug
dust24–130.0219%30 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0316%30 Aug
dust213–16-0.0323%29 Aug
mirage13–40.0519%29 Aug
dust24–13-0.0519%26 Aug
nuke13–110.0519%26 Aug
ancient7–130.0720%25 Aug
dust213–90.0619%25 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0326%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0325%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0627%29 Jul
dust210–130.0323%28 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0018%7 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0528%9 Jun
nuke6–130.0424%9 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0421%9 Jun
inferno13–90.0119%8 Jun
ancient3–130.0124%8 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0121%8 Jun
dust213–11-0.0115%8 Jun
nuke13–50.1119%8 Jun
ancient10–130.0340%5 Jun
inferno2–50.0010%5 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0328%5 Jun
nuke13–60.0536%5 Jun
dust211–13-0.0626%5 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0427%2 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0513%2 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0311%27 May
nuke12–12-0.0027%27 May
cache5–13-0.0610%27 May
dust213–8-0.0220%27 May
ancient8–13-0.0129%26 May
anubis13–100.049%26 May
nuke13–60.0825%25 May
dust212–120.0921%25 May
mirage13–40.1319%25 May
inferno13–7-0.0131%24 May
nuke10–13-0.0224%24 May
dust27–40.1041%24 May
nuke8–130.0132%23 May
dust27–13-0.0919%23 May
cache13–90.0022%21 May
dust213–40.0610%21 May
nuke7–13-0.0115%21 May
dust213–160.0220%19 May
mirage12–12-0.0310%19 May
nuke13–30.1734%19 May
dust213–11-0.0423%19 May
dust21–8-0.130%19 May
inferno5–130.0228%19 May
nuke5–130.0425%19 May
anubis2–8-0.0425%19 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →