SAVIORS — CS2 Stats

76561198009459813[U:1:49194085]

2,627Tracked matches36%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,200Blue band · top ~37.9% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning54

Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–51–7Last 10042%Win rateLWWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression5.7

Utility3.5

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning5.4

Utility3.5

Mechanics7.6

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact0.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time629ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms

Headshot accuracy20.5%+3.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 5–13

13–0Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 100% over 6cacheWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	29	12–17	41%	0.00
inferno	B	24	11–13	46%	0.01
anubis	C	15	6–9	40%	0.01
nuke	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.03
ancient	D	7	2–5	29%	0.03
mirage	S	6	6–0	100%	0.01
cache	D	6	1–5	17%	0.00
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

580Matches

48%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

66.5ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	155	49%	0.95	13.5
Anubis	125	58%	0.94	13.7
Dust2	93	45%	0.83	12.8
Nuke	55	51%	0.87	13.3
Vertigo	43	47%	0.95	12.9
Mirage	43	42%	0.80	12.2
Ancient	26	19%	0.64	11.0
Train	6	67%	0.85	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy

36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.7%Spray accuracy

84.2%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

630msReaction time

28.4%T opening success

53.9%CT opening success

0.32Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

5.75HE damage / grenade

9.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3172 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.3552% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	10–13	-0.00	17%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	33%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	12%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.10	20%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	14%	11 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	14%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	25%	10 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.04	12%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	34%	10 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	26%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	16%	10 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.06	8%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.02	19%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	27%	8 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.04	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	20%	6 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.01	14%	6 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	23%	5 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.04	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	15%	5 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	20%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.01	27%	4 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.05	26%	4 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.07	18%	4 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.12	22%	4 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	15%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	19%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	31%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–0	-0.03	24%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	20%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–0	0.11	31%	2 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.06	11%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	14%	2 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	26%	1 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.03	23%	1 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	24%	30 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	23%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.00	25%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	15%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	19%	29 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	19%	28 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.04	25%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	23%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	14%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	32%	27 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	16%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	18%	26 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.13	18%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	11%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	15%	23 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	24%	21 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.04	20%	20 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	19%	20 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	29%	19 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.02	10%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–6	-0.02	4%	18 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.04	23%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.01	17%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	24%	17 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	19%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.05	17%	14 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.08	19%	14 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	12%	13 Jul →
inferno	0–13	-0.09	11%	12 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	12%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	15%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.05	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.01	8%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.03	13%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.09	21%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	22%	11 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.01	21%	7 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	18%	7 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	18%	6 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.07	12%	6 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	27%	6 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	17%	5 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	23%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	25%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	23%	5 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	10%	4 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.06	15%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.12	23%	2 Jul →
inferno	9–7	0.07	16%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	8%	1 Jul →
overpass	12–12	-0.07	18%	30 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.05	19%	30 Jun →
inferno	8–4	-0.06	14%	30 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	10%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.02	20%	29 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.04	21%	29 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	19%	28 Jun →
anubis	2–13	-0.04	22%	28 Jun →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	13%	28 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	8%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.06	18%	26 Jun →