deedee

deedee — CS2 Stats

NE76561198008517284[U:1:48251556]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,545Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20531 of 251379 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,229 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +391 13 May – 26 Sept · 24 days played
22,59225,000peak 25,00013 May26 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,229 +0 7 Sept – 20 Sept · 6 observations
2,2292,229peak 2,2297 Sept20 Sept
25,824Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,229Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,229
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 271 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,000
  • +1,972 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,969 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdeedeeFACEITLevel 10 · 2,229 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,229csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning58
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–51Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +7.8pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility7.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.8
Utility7.7
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time519ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 19 Jul →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 1–6 · dust2, 26 Sept →
352msFastest reaction time · 1–8 · anubis, 29 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 12infernoWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2511–1444%0.02
mirageB2312–1152%0.05
ancientA127–558%0.06
nukeA116–555%0.02
infernoD103–730%0.05
cacheA95–456%0.04
anubisA95–456%0.01
train—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

989Matches
56%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
93.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10656%1.3818.7
Dust28558%1.4719.9
Nuke7761%1.3018.2
Ancient7258%1.5620.3
Inferno6042%1.1917.6
Anubis5349%1.3920.8
Train1362%1.6019.5
Cache956%1.4419.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
509msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
12.55HE damage / grenade
19.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.996% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–70.0216%2 Oct →
dust21–60.0467%26 Sept →
mirage13–50.1122%26 Sept →
mirage4–130.1026%26 Sept →
ancient13–50.1226%26 Sept →
anubis13–80.0416%26 Sept →
dust210–130.0442%25 Sept →
dust26–130.0327%25 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0121%15 Sept →
anubis13–110.0333%13 Sept →
mirage17–190.0520%13 Sept →
ancient9–130.0624%12 Sept →
cache13–110.0222%11 Sept →
mirage10–130.0417%4 Sept →
inferno13–70.0820%4 Sept →
mirage13–60.1222%4 Sept →
nuke13–100.0323%4 Sept →
anubis13–90.0416%4 Sept →
dust213–50.0725%4 Sept →
dust213–70.0729%29 Aug →
anubis1–8-0.0329%29 Aug →
mirage13–90.0813%22 Aug →
anubis13–50.1421%22 Aug →
nuke13–50.0630%22 Aug →
cache13–70.0027%22 Aug →
inferno11–130.0725%14 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0113%31 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0122%25 Jul →
mirage13–80.0413%25 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0414%25 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0127%25 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0125%25 Jul →
mirage10–130.0821%25 Jul →
cache11–130.1134%25 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0018%25 Jul →
dust24–130.0829%25 Jul →
ancient13–70.0312%21 Jul →
mirage13–20.1022%20 Jul →
dust210–130.0324%20 Jul →
nuke14–16-0.0123%19 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0323%19 Jul →
mirage13–90.1620%19 Jul →
dust213–110.0623%19 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0125%19 Jul →
ancient13–90.0826%18 Jul →
mirage13–60.1014%18 Jul →
dust211–130.0021%18 Jul →
mirage13–80.0826%16 Jul →
dust213–40.1118%16 Jul →
ancient9–130.0724%16 Jul →
cache13–110.0219%16 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0427%16 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0227%16 Jul →
mirage9–130.0934%16 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0118%16 Jul →
inferno7–130.0730%15 Jul →
ancient13–50.1230%15 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0219%15 Jul →
nuke13–40.0126%14 Jul →
inferno13–30.1133%14 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0030%14 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0227%14 Jul →
dust213–00.0215%14 Jul →
dust216–130.0228%14 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0225%10 Jul →
nuke13–40.0826%10 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0217%10 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0329%10 Jul →
mirage13–80.0324%3 Jul →
dust216–130.0122%3 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0039%6 Jun →
nuke13–80.0822%5 Jun →
inferno10–130.0432%5 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0426%5 Jun →
dust22–13-0.0813%5 Jun →
inferno13–110.0729%5 Jun →
mirage10–130.0828%23 May →
anubis14–16-0.0020%23 May →
dust27–130.0431%23 May →
ancient13–110.1029%23 May →
cache13–20.1420%21 May →
inferno4–130.0033%20 May →
ancient7–130.0615%15 May →
mirage9–130.0618%15 May →
dust25–13-0.0029%15 May →
nuke0–13-0.0811%15 May →
ancient1–130.0430%15 May →
anubis0–13-0.0741%15 May →
nuke13–50.0824%15 May →
dust213–8-0.0130%15 May →
nuke8–130.0431%14 May →
dust24–13-0.0347%14 May →
ancient13–10-0.0018%14 May →
train9–13-0.0412%14 May →
cache5–130.0313%13 May →
mirage13–40.1014%13 May →
ancient16–140.0125%13 May →
inferno8–130.0334%13 May →
dust213–100.0832%13 May →
mirage13–10-0.0533%13 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.