jomi)

jomi) — CS2 Stats

FI76561198006975077[U:1:46709349]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,153Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,644Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,010 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,010 → 3,010
+1Tracked matches · now 3,153
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 68 days played since 13 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,010 +0 5 Sept15 Sept · 3 observations
3,0103,010peak 3,0105 Sept15 Sept
3,010Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
68Days played since 2025-09-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,010
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 490 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-09-05
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-05

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches38−5
Win rate67%75%−8pp
K/D0.521.06−0.54
Headshot %50%52%−2pp

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=26,479), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate61.8%51.0%
Shot accuracy13.5%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.031.09
Match win rate57.1%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjomi)FACEITLevel 10 · 3,010 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,010csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning75
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5743Last 10057%Win rateWWWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −102ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.4
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 550ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 12 Feb
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 26 Oct
359msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 2 Jan
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 2 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W3Current streak
135In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 72% over 18anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB28151354%0.01
dust2S1813572%0.00
mirageS1611569%0.01
infernoB115645%-0.01
cacheA106460%0.02
ancientD62433%-0.01
anubisD51420%-0.00
overpass32167%0.03
train21150%0.01
alpine110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

302,048Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
8,857Matches
57.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 10 players
61.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
13.5%Shot accuracy
28,370MVPs
5,629Hours (in match)
10,281Bombs planted
2,410Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47137,270
AWP16,833
Knife6,663
P2504,655
Tec-93,354

Lifetime map wins

19,159dust2
12,480inferno
12,179nuke
9,545train
4,033cbble
1,204vertigo
131aztec
91assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,940Matches
57%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
84.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage59261%1.1216.7
Nuke43563%1.1616.2
Dust241559%1.0716.5
Inferno18650%1.0615.9
Anubis15547%1.0216.9
Train11662%1.2618.6
Ancient10646%0.9415.3
Overpass4353%1.1417.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
546msReaction time
49.4%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
10.30HE damage / grenade
10.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0711%6 Sept
cache13–80.0534%5 Sept
cache16–140.0219%31 Aug
cache9–130.0518%30 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0019%26 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0122%16 Aug
nuke9–130.0513%16 Aug
inferno13–30.0821%16 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0515%15 Aug
nuke16–120.0418%15 Aug
inferno13–70.0616%14 Aug
anubis5–130.0217%14 Aug
cache3–13-0.0114%10 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0124%9 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0418%9 Aug
nuke7–130.0125%1 Aug
cache8–130.0524%25 Jul
nuke13–70.0418%25 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0216%25 Jul
cache13–50.0621%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0323%25 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0231%24 Jul
nuke13–80.0413%22 May
mirage10–130.0219%19 May
dust27–130.0425%19 May
cache13–10-0.0218%14 May
cache13–70.0322%13 May
cache9–13-0.0313%13 May
inferno7–13-0.0518%12 May
cache13–70.0013%9 May
mirage13–3-0.0121%19 Apr
mirage13–50.0216%6 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0319%6 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0022%3 Apr
dust213–80.0122%3 Apr
dust210–130.0223%29 Mar
ancient7–0-0.014%29 Mar
dust213–11-0.0118%16 Mar
nuke7–130.0233%16 Mar
mirage13–100.0513%9 Mar
nuke10–130.0024%7 Mar
nuke13–110.0725%16 Feb
mirage9–130.0726%15 Feb
dust213–9-0.0324%12 Feb
dust213–70.0926%12 Feb
dust27–13-0.0126%10 Feb
anubis13–16-0.0012%10 Feb
ancient10–130.0228%7 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0418%6 Feb
nuke13–110.0017%5 Feb
dust23–13-0.0418%2 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0318%31 Jan
nuke13–60.0626%30 Jan
nuke13–90.0121%25 Jan
nuke16–13-0.0018%24 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0010%24 Jan
alpine13–90.0425%22 Jan
anubis13–110.0114%22 Jan
inferno6–130.0228%17 Jan
dust216–130.0331%17 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0319%7 Jan
dust26–13-0.0423%4 Jan
inferno13–10.0338%2 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0024%2 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0411%1 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0326%21 Dec
ancient16–140.0117%19 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0437%17 Dec
mirage16–14-0.0221%15 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0415%9 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0020%8 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0115%7 Dec
dust213–7-0.0710%23 Nov
dust213–110.0410%22 Nov
nuke8–130.0714%17 Nov
inferno3–13-0.1129%14 Nov
mirage13–9-0.038%8 Nov
dust213–110.0121%1 Nov
train11–13-0.0115%1 Nov
nuke2–13-0.0515%1 Nov
dust213–30.0650%26 Oct
train13–70.0234%23 Oct
mirage6–130.0327%23 Oct
nuke13–30.0718%20 Oct
inferno19–220.0213%19 Oct
dust213–80.0224%19 Oct
dust213–100.0320%11 Oct
nuke9–13-0.0216%30 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0218%30 Sept
dust213–90.0020%30 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0224%30 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0429%30 Sept
mirage19–170.0723%29 Sept
overpass9–130.0319%28 Sept
nuke16–14-0.0316%26 Sept
overpass13–40.0420%26 Sept
mirage13–90.0317%25 Sept
overpass19–170.0212%13 Sept
inferno13–30.0216%13 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0811%13 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →