niso

niso — CS2 Stats

US76561198006604977[U:1:46339249]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,189Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,663Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,093 → 1,093
+21Tracked matches · now 1,189
+0.9ppWin rate · 62.1% → 63.0%

Rating over time

1,093Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,093
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 108 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnisoPEAK ELO1,093csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning64
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–35–12Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · +0ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch6.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time595ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–4 · eldorado, 26 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · nuke, 2 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 2–2 · nuke, 30 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA6034–2657%0.00
ancientC52–340%0.06
cacheA53–260%0.03
debrisC52–340%0.02
eldoradoA53–260%0.06
inferno—42–250%-0.02
mirage—32–167%0.03
rush_001—20–20%-0.14
boulder—22–0100%0.08
shelter—21–150%0.07
poseidon—20–20%-0.03
train—11–0100%0.05
dust2—10–10%-0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.11
anubis—11–0100%0.01
office—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,512Lifetime kills
1.04K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,539Matches
41.1%Match win rate
54.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
3.9%Shot accuracy
3,488MVPs
1,059Hours (in match)
1,368Bombs planted
457Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,009nuke
3,360dust2
1,136inferno
388train
193office
137vertigo
23safehouse
22lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

38Matches
53%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
82.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1547%1.1614.7
Dust2944%1.3114.9
Inferno580%1.4223.0
Ancient450%1.0816.0
Nuke333%0.9714.7
Overpass1100%1.0520.0
Anubis1100%1.757.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
87.4%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
591msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.97HE damage / grenade
13.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5074% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.1125%11 Oct →
nuke13–20.0032%7 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0219%5 Oct →
ancient13–60.0823%5 Oct →
rush_0013–7-0.106%1 Oct →
rush_0010–4-0.190%1 Oct →
nuke13–40.0316%1 Oct →
nuke5–130.0133%18 Sept →
cache13–40.0824%18 Sept →
nuke10–130.0110%7 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0627%7 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0124%7 Sept →
train13–60.0526%7 Sept →
ancient11–130.0015%7 Sept →
ancient12–120.0312%7 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0220%7 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0117%7 Sept →
cache13–60.0017%6 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0021%5 Sept →
nuke12–120.0842%5 Sept →
nuke13–30.0429%5 Sept →
ancient13–60.0216%2 Sept →
mirage7–130.0220%2 Sept →
ancient1–40.1613%2 Sept →
mirage13–80.0827%31 Aug →
cache13–110.1219%31 Aug →
inferno13–100.0712%31 Aug →
nuke2–2-0.130%30 Aug →
boulder13–30.0623%29 Aug →
nuke13–20.0231%29 Aug →
boulder13–60.1011%29 Aug →
nuke12–120.0120%29 Aug →
dust28–13-0.055%29 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0219%29 Aug →
nuke16–130.0416%29 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0335%23 Aug →
nuke13–30.0235%23 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0121%22 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0832%16 Aug →
nuke13–40.0717%16 Aug →
nuke13–90.0820%16 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0513%15 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0418%15 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0112%15 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.119%9 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0731%9 Aug →
nuke13–80.0217%9 Aug →
nuke0–70.0129%9 Aug →
nuke13–80.0331%9 Aug →
nuke13–80.0319%9 Aug →
nuke4–00.1427%8 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0319%8 Aug →
nuke13–90.0618%8 Aug →
nuke11–70.0216%7 Aug →
inferno9–3-0.029%7 Aug →
debris4–9-0.0611%7 Aug →
eldorado9–70.0426%7 Aug →
nuke13–100.0413%4 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0812%4 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0424%3 Aug →
nuke12–120.0324%2 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0411%2 Aug →
nuke12–12-0.0719%2 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0316%2 Aug →
nuke12–120.0725%2 Aug →
nuke13–30.1843%2 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0326%2 Aug →
nuke13–70.0313%2 Aug →
inferno1–6-0.110%2 Aug →
nuke13–40.0418%2 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0318%1 Aug →
debris8–80.016%1 Aug →
eldorado9–40.0719%1 Aug →
nuke13–70.0019%1 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.1026%1 Aug →
overpass3–9-0.115%31 Jul →
nuke6–130.0221%30 Jul →
nuke12–12-0.0116%27 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0419%27 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0527%26 Jul →
anubis13–50.019%26 Jul →
shelter7–130.0719%26 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0130%26 Jul →
debris2–9-0.128%26 Jul →
eldorado8–80.0530%26 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.1116%26 Jul →
shelter13–30.0717%26 Jul →
poseidon5–9-0.0717%26 Jul →
eldorado8–8-0.0319%26 Jul →
debris9–60.1117%26 Jul →
office12–12-0.069%26 Jul →
nuke11–130.0126%26 Jul →
nuke13–60.0635%26 Jul →
poseidon8–80.0015%26 Jul →
debris9–30.1512%26 Jul →
eldorado9–40.1925%26 Jul →
nuke13–30.1626%25 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0327%25 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.0427%25 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0218%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.