CoNa | RonsSambarobics

CoNa | RonsSambarobics — CS2 Stats

76561198006467756[U:1:46202028]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,200Tracked matches28%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,712Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,785Light Blue band · top ~70.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 650 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,785 +4,111 27 Aug – 29 Sept · 23 days played
1,8986,785peak 6,78527 Aug29 Sept
6,785Peak Premier in tracked matches
650Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 650
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 6,785
  • +4,887 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,215 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches84——
Win rate40%——
K/D0.86——
Headshot %32%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate35.3%41.3%41.8%6.5% short
Shot accuracy10.3%12.7%12.2%2.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.870.950.980.10 short
Match win rate40.1%42.6%43.3%3.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 3 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCoNa | RonsSambarobicsFACEITLevel 2 · 650 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER6,785 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO650csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning50
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD36–59–5Last 10036%Win rateLWLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility3.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 34% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.0
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time595ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy9.2%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 10.0% → last ⅓ avg 9.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 3 Sept →
19%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 21 Sept →
398msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 23 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 31% over 35
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D3511–2431%-0.03
nukeC229–1341%0.01
infernoC156–940%-0.02
cacheC114–736%-0.03
ancientA85–363%-0.00
vertigo—30–30%-0.02
fachwerk—31–233%-0.05
boulder—20–20%-0.04
mirage—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,694Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
2,486Matches
40.1%Match win rate
35.3%Headshot %
10.3%Shot accuracy
4,166MVPs
901Hours (in match)
2,604Bombs planted
661Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,132dust2
3,872inferno
3,645nuke
1,047train
683vertigo
221office
127italy
121cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
49%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
70.7ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23148%0.8613.7
Nuke1070%1.1713.1
Anubis560%0.9414.6
Ancient540%0.6611.2
Inferno560%1.0415.8
Mirage20%0.6912.0
Cache10%0.5310.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.8%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
602msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.86HE damage / grenade
5.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.8124% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.7043% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 35 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo4–9-0.052%29 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0811%29 Sept →
nuke10–130.0410%29 Sept →
nuke9–130.118%29 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0312%29 Sept →
cache13–8-0.027%28 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1513%28 Sept →
nuke13–70.074%27 Sept →
nuke10–130.0711%27 Sept →
cache11–13-0.017%27 Sept →
dust213–8-0.067%26 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0316%26 Sept →
dust25–130.0519%26 Sept →
inferno6–130.015%26 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.009%23 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.039%23 Sept →
nuke13–100.067%23 Sept →
fachwerk12–12-0.080%23 Sept →
dust22–13-0.029%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0111%22 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0212%22 Sept →
fachwerk10–13-0.030%21 Sept →
nuke16–120.0211%21 Sept →
dust211–130.0219%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.028%20 Sept →
boulder9–13-0.0117%20 Sept →
cache7–13-0.029%20 Sept →
dust213–110.0913%20 Sept →
nuke11–130.009%18 Sept →
dust20–13-0.080%18 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0116%18 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.075%18 Sept →
nuke13–30.047%18 Sept →
nuke11–130.0010%17 Sept →
dust213–110.067%17 Sept →
inferno13–10.0910%17 Sept →
boulder12–12-0.070%16 Sept →
fachwerk13–4-0.059%16 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0712%16 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0010%16 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0214%13 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.012%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.095%13 Sept →
dust215–15-0.025%13 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.096%12 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.018%12 Sept →
ancient13–80.017%12 Sept →
dust211–130.0111%12 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0115%12 Sept →
nuke13–2-0.0113%12 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.025%9 Sept →
nuke13–40.035%9 Sept →
ancient13–80.0110%9 Sept →
ancient13–70.046%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0617%8 Sept →
nuke10–5-0.066%8 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.066%8 Sept →
dust213–70.0411%8 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0116%8 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.104%7 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.048%7 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0314%7 Sept →
dust24–13-0.088%7 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.014%7 Sept →
nuke5–130.0113%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.028%7 Sept →
nuke13–110.0118%6 Sept →
inferno13–90.0210%3 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0118%3 Sept →
cache1–13-0.090%3 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0211%3 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.038%3 Sept →
inferno9–70.1216%3 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.096%3 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0114%2 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0713%2 Sept →
dust25–13-0.028%2 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0015%2 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0211%2 Sept →
ancient13–50.0110%2 Sept →
dust24–13-0.038%2 Sept →
cache5–13-0.075%2 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0313%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0616%1 Sept →
cache10–3-0.0215%1 Sept →
dust29–13-0.1010%1 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.129%1 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0212%1 Sept →
inferno13–70.034%1 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.056%31 Aug →
dust21–13-0.144%31 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0612%31 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.074%31 Aug →
dust24–13-0.107%31 Aug →
vertigo9–130.034%31 Aug →
dust27–130.0111%31 Aug →
vertigo8–8-0.0314%31 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0110%28 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0216%28 Aug →
cache1–13-0.0311%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.