Ninuz

Ninuz — CS2 Stats

76561198002439124[U:1:42173396]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,041Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
920Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating7,177Light Blue band · top ~68.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 978 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+184Premier CS Rating · 6,993 → 7,177

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,177 -3,130 26 Aug – 26 Oct · 21 days played
6,99310,307peak 10,30726 Aug26 Oct
10,307Peak Premier in tracked matches
978Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 978
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 73 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-25
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,130 below peak (10,307)
  • -1,720 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 2,823 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches82——
Win rate41%——
K/D1.27——
Headshot %60%——

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 26 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate53.7%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.021.030.10 short
Match win rate44.3%44.7%45.2%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNinuzFACEITLevel 5 · 978 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER7,177 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO978csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning61
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–58–3Last 10039%Win rateWWLLLLWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility5.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning6.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time622ms+50ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 15 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · rush_001, 9 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 5 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 11dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC238–1535%-0.03
nukeB178–947%-0.01
infernoC167–944%0.02
cacheA116–555%-0.04
mirageD113–827%-0.04
dust2D92–722%-0.02
anubisD82–625%-0.03
rush_001—32–167%0.05
overpass—10–10%-0.06
vertigo—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,249Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
1,159Matches
44.3%Match win rate
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,679MVPs
516Hours (in match)
735Bombs planted
325Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,048inferno
2,587nuke
325dust2
295train
221vertigo
31office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
53%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
70.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2065%1.0715.1
Ancient1850%0.8011.3
Nuke1040%0.8415.6
Mirage560%0.8214.6
Cache450%0.5912.8
Overpass475%1.3415.3
Anubis333%0.4610.7
Dust220%0.387.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
29.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.6%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
623msReaction time
61.9%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
10.23HE damage / grenade
6.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–14-0.0115%26 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0017%26 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0420%26 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.126%26 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0215%23 Oct →
dust28–130.0116%22 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0221%22 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.018%20 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0514%19 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0319%19 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0626%19 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0218%17 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0829%17 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0421%17 Oct →
nuke13–30.0415%17 Oct →
nuke13–40.0924%17 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0333%17 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0413%16 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0415%14 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0917%14 Oct →
nuke8–8-0.0220%14 Oct →
inferno9–30.1412%14 Oct →
inferno6–90.0243%14 Oct →
ancient1–130.0018%13 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0627%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0412%12 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.049%11 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0118%10 Oct →
inferno13–80.0122%10 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0413%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0524%10 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0212%10 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0614%9 Oct →
rush_0015–8-0.0215%9 Oct →
rush_0018–40.0710%9 Oct →
rush_0014–00.1067%9 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0417%9 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0421%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0421%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0714%6 Oct →
dust213–10.0521%6 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0217%6 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0412%5 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0317%5 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0119%4 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0218%1 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0622%1 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0215%30 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0825%30 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0912%30 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0424%30 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0321%29 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0218%29 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0511%28 Sept →
ancient11–00.0621%28 Sept →
overpass7–9-0.065%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0219%27 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0411%27 Sept →
ancient13–40.0120%27 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0711%26 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0318%26 Sept →
inferno12–160.0125%26 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0319%26 Sept →
ancient9–130.0324%25 Sept →
inferno9–40.1317%24 Sept →
vertigo4–2-0.0027%22 Sept →
anubis12–120.0418%22 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0323%22 Sept →
nuke8–130.0324%22 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0620%21 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.1115%20 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0616%18 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0629%18 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0123%18 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0612%18 Sept →
ancient13–70.0313%16 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0718%15 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.1225%15 Sept →
inferno9–10.2219%15 Sept →
inferno7–90.1019%15 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0412%14 Sept →
nuke12–160.005%14 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0630%1 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0015%1 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0825%1 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0518%1 Sept →
dust213–60.0120%1 Sept →
mirage8–130.0324%31 Aug →
dust23–12-0.0123%31 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0524%31 Aug →
nuke13–100.0511%31 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0120%31 Aug →
ancient9–130.1013%30 Aug →
cache13–10-0.078%30 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.063%29 Aug →
mirage13–50.0818%29 Aug →
inferno13–90.0225%29 Aug →
ancient4–10-0.0714%28 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0617%28 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0525%26 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.