Kr0ell3 - Pygoscelis Antarcticus

Kr0ell3 - Pygoscelis Antarcticus — CS2 Stats

DK76561197999601548[U:1:39335820]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,573Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,781Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,922 +7,226 12 Apr – 21 Mar · 13 days played
16,62523,922peak 23,92212 Apr21 Mar
24,149Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,308Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2025-04-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches12——
Win rate17%——
K/D1.85——
Headshot %40%——

Measured 25 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.3%44.8%45.7%2.4% short
Shot accuracy18.5%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.171.031.05above
Match win rate42.2%45.2%45.7%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKr0ell3 - Pygoscelis Anta…FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,308csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning48
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateWLWTLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 4–15–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility7.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch4.0

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.8
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time611ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 21 Mar →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 21 Mar →
422msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 11 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 7 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16overpassWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2812–1643%0.01
infernoS2114–767%0.02
ancientS1611–569%0.00
anubisB136–746%-0.01
overpassD72–529%0.00
nukeB63–350%-0.00
train—40–40%-0.02
cache—31–233%-0.03
mirage—10–10%-0.03
jura—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

191,299Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
8,043Matches
42.2%Match win rate
43.3%Headshot %
18.5%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 6 players
18,022MVPs
3,781Hours (in match)
6,127Bombs planted
2,089Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,776
AWP18,715
P2505,325
MAC-104,315
SG 5534,250

Lifetime map wins

19,403inferno
17,130dust2
5,234nuke
2,356train
2,013vertigo
1,798cbble
275office
209lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,488Matches
49%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
76.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2148%0.9914.9
Anubis1926%0.8513.5
Ancient1638%0.8213.9
Dust21527%0.8612.7
Nuke729%0.9314.4
Cache30%0.558.3
Train20%0.8417.0
Vertigo10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
606msReaction time
25.6%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
11.38HE damage / grenade
15.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5955% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0221%11 Oct →
dust27–130.0220%11 Oct →
cache6–10.0229%11 Oct →
ancient15–150.0017%25 Jul →
dust210–130.0421%25 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0620%18 Jul →
dust29–130.0016%18 Jul →
inferno13–50.0518%18 Jul →
ancient10–130.0714%11 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.038%11 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0025%11 Jul →
dust213–30.0719%11 Jul →
overpass2–13-0.0324%27 Jun →
inferno4–13-0.0721%27 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0019%16 May →
anubis13–16-0.0314%16 May →
dust27–130.0219%16 May →
cache10–13-0.0519%9 May →
anubis3–13-0.0717%21 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0529%21 Mar →
inferno13–40.1017%21 Mar →
dust213–60.0633%21 Mar →
inferno15–15-0.0415%21 Feb →
overpass13–6-0.0120%21 Feb →
inferno13–80.059%21 Feb →
ancient13–110.0216%21 Feb →
nuke15–150.006%21 Feb →
dust213–90.0112%21 Feb →
ancient0–13-0.1212%12 Feb →
dust213–60.0716%12 Feb →
ancient10–6-0.0020%12 Feb →
dust213–60.037%12 Feb →
ancient13–100.0916%7 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0325%7 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0410%7 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0112%7 Feb →
inferno13–00.1021%7 Feb →
overpass9–130.0715%7 Feb →
inferno13–160.0622%16 Jan →
dust213–80.0319%10 Jan →
ancient13–40.0811%10 Jan →
train3–13-0.0121%9 Jan →
overpass3–13-0.0411%9 Jan →
ancient13–40.0814%9 Jan →
overpass10–13-0.0014%9 Jan →
train7–13-0.0220%30 Dec →
overpass15–15-0.0015%30 Dec →
inferno13–100.0612%30 Dec →
inferno13–70.0216%20 Dec →
ancient13–10-0.0211%20 Dec →
dust213–6-0.0113%14 Dec →
overpass13–100.0217%14 Dec →
dust213–110.0310%7 Dec →
inferno16–13-0.0014%7 Dec →
dust211–13-0.0322%4 Dec →
inferno13–50.0420%23 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0211%23 Nov →
anubis13–100.0019%12 Jul →
dust28–130.0613%12 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0217%3 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0523%3 Jul →
ancient8–130.0111%3 Jul →
anubis9–130.0317%28 Jun →
inferno13–90.0623%28 Jun →
nuke13–10.048%22 Jun →
dust214–16-0.0314%20 Jun →
inferno8–130.0315%20 Jun →
jura8–130.0311%20 Jun →
dust210–130.0117%20 Jun →
anubis13–9-0.0217%17 Jun →
train12–16-0.0125%6 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.095%31 May →
ancient13–11-0.018%29 May →
inferno13–5-0.0516%29 May →
anubis13–11-0.0712%29 May →
dust213–10.099%29 May →
nuke9–13-0.0611%29 May →
inferno13–9-0.006%29 May →
anubis13–40.0618%29 May →
dust23–13-0.0428%23 May →
inferno13–50.048%23 May →
nuke13–60.0614%22 May →
anubis9–130.0112%22 May →
inferno11–130.0119%22 May →
anubis13–10-0.027%9 May →
ancient13–70.0213%9 May →
nuke13–80.0321%25 Apr →
ancient4–13-0.0615%25 Apr →
anubis15–150.0115%25 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0020%19 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0911%19 Apr →
dust213–70.0218%18 Apr →
anubis13–16-0.0111%18 Apr →
ancient13–50.026%16 Apr →
inferno13–60.038%16 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.079%16 Apr →
train6–13-0.052%12 Apr →
anubis13–80.0224%12 Apr →
dust216–13-0.0422%12 Apr →
dust213–60.0214%11 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.