Sonon — CS2 Stats

DE76561197999149208[U:1:38883480]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

614Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,484Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating13,694Blue band · top ~35.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#155112 of 251268 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Dec 2025 (302 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,694 -1,188 21 Aug – 14 Dec · 3 days played

14,882Peak Premier in tracked matches

28Days played since 2025-08-21

Premier CS Rating

1,188 below peak (14,882)
+24 over 90 days
Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,306 to go
Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	32.8%	42.7%	43.7%	10.9% short
Shot accuracy	20.1%	11.3%	12.0%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.09	0.99	1.02	above
Match win rate	50.5%	43.9%	44.7%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39

Positioning33

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT64–33–3Last 10064%Win rateWLWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +105ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 692ms

Last 10

8–2 · 80% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 723ms

Last 20

13–6–1 · 65% win rate
Avg rating -0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 670ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim3.9

Utility5.2

Positioning3.3

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9

Positioning3.3

Utility5.2

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time686ms−8ms

first ⅓ avg 694ms → last ⅓ avg 686ms

Headshot accuracy12.4%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 13 Jan →

30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · vertigo, 2 Oct →

406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · vertigo, 2 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 31 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak

4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 68% over 72dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
vertigo	S	72	49–23	68%	-0.02
dust2	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00
golden	—	4	4–0	100%	0.02
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
mirage	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.01
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
palacio	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.07
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
italy	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,602Lifetime kills

1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players

3,018Matches

50.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 4 players

32.8%Headshot %

20.1%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 4 players

6,085MVPs

1,484Hours (in match)

3,491Bombs planted

1,011Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,995

M4A4 / M4A1-S10,994

AWP9,514

P2000 / USP-S3,653

P2502,085

Desert Eagle1,985

Glock-181,860

Galil AR1,389

P901,384

Five-SeveN1,382

Lifetime map wins

6,378dust2

6,114vertigo

4,593inferno

3,103cbble

688train

347nuke

55office

41italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

344Matches

50%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

66.7ADR

29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	1	0%	1.10	22.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.67	8.0
Dust2	1	0%	0.50	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy

27.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.5%Spray accuracy

80.5%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

682msReaction time

20.5%T opening success

21.7%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

4.0%Flash assists

9.94HE damage / grenade

5.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.9318% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.486% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	13–9	-0.00	20%	22 Feb →
vertigo	1–13	-0.10	11%	22 Feb →
vertigo	13–6	-0.03	17%	21 Feb →
vertigo	13–1	0.04	18%	31 Jan →
vertigo	13–10	-0.01	15%	31 Jan →
vertigo	13–1	0.02	20%	31 Jan →
vertigo	13–5	-0.03	9%	31 Jan →
vertigo	13–10	-0.00	19%	31 Jan →
vertigo	13–7	0.00	6%	31 Jan →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	9%	31 Jan →
vertigo	13–1	0.01	11%	31 Jan →
vertigo	10–13	-0.09	7%	24 Jan →
vertigo	13–5	-0.02	4%	24 Jan →
anubis	12–12	-0.07	16%	24 Jan →
overpass	0–8	-0.03	27%	24 Jan →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	21%	24 Jan →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	10%	24 Jan →
vertigo	2–13	-0.03	8%	24 Jan →
vertigo	5–13	-0.05	14%	24 Jan →
vertigo	13–8	0.00	8%	24 Jan →
vertigo	7–13	-0.01	11%	24 Jan →
vertigo	13–8	0.07	4%	18 Jan →
palacio	3–13	-0.09	13%	18 Jan →
overpass	13–10	0.06	13%	18 Jan →
golden	13–5	0.08	15%	17 Jan →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	23%	17 Jan →
vertigo	13–9	-0.05	5%	17 Jan →
vertigo	13–10	0.00	23%	17 Jan →
vertigo	8–13	-0.06	8%	17 Jan →
golden	13–5	0.00	9%	17 Jan →
vertigo	13–5	-0.03	3%	17 Jan →
vertigo	2–13	-0.10	6%	17 Jan →
vertigo	13–8	-0.05	6%	17 Jan →
palacio	13–7	-0.06	16%	17 Jan →
vertigo	11–13	-0.07	14%	17 Jan →
vertigo	9–13	-0.07	22%	17 Jan →
golden	13–9	0.01	20%	16 Jan →
dust2	13–2	0.16	13%	13 Jan →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	11%	10 Jan →
golden	13–7	0.00	7%	10 Jan →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	27%	10 Jan →
vertigo	11–13	-0.02	10%	3 Jan →
vertigo	13–7	-0.02	8%	3 Jan →
vertigo	13–6	0.00	20%	3 Jan →
vertigo	13–6	-0.02	18%	3 Jan →
vertigo	6–0	0.03	25%	3 Jan →
vertigo	7–0	0.06	13%	3 Jan →
vertigo	13–7	-0.01	7%	2 Jan →
vertigo	13–3	0.04	8%	2 Jan →
vertigo	13–3	0.01	17%	2 Jan →
vertigo	13–3	-0.06	26%	2 Jan →
vertigo	13–3	-0.05	13%	2 Jan →
vertigo	13–3	0.06	13%	2 Jan →
vertigo	13–5	0.01	7%	1 Jan →
vertigo	11–13	-0.05	8%	28 Dec →
overpass	3–13	-0.06	4%	28 Dec →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	11%	28 Dec →
inferno	13–2	0.02	13%	28 Dec →
vertigo	10–13	0.02	9%	28 Dec →
vertigo	12–12	0.01	12%	28 Dec →
vertigo	4–13	-0.09	5%	28 Dec →
vertigo	13–10	-0.06	10%	28 Dec →
vertigo	13–5	-0.05	9%	28 Dec →
vertigo	13–6	0.05	18%	28 Dec →
inferno	10–13	0.01	11%	28 Dec →
mirage	12–8	0.02	24%	27 Dec →
nuke	13–8	0.02	10%	27 Dec →
inferno	8–13	0.02	12%	27 Dec →
overpass	13–11	0.06	16%	14 Dec →
dust2	8–13	0.06	16%	8 Dec →
dust2	9–13	0.03	30%	8 Dec →
vertigo	13–3	-0.01	12%	2 Nov →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	16%	2 Nov →
vertigo	9–13	-0.05	21%	25 Oct →
vertigo	13–2	0.02	10%	25 Oct →
vertigo	13–7	-0.06	8%	25 Oct →
vertigo	13–7	-0.08	6%	24 Oct →
vertigo	2–3	-0.10	0%	4 Oct →
vertigo	9–9	-0.06	23%	4 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	-0.07	19%	4 Oct →
vertigo	13–2	0.05	22%	4 Oct →
vertigo	13–3	0.03	15%	4 Oct →
vertigo	6–13	-0.05	23%	2 Oct →
vertigo	13–6	0.02	30%	2 Oct →
vertigo	13–7	0.01	12%	26 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	-0.06	14%	26 Sept →
italy	10–13	-0.02	17%	19 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	-0.00	16%	19 Sept →
vertigo	3–13	-0.03	17%	14 Sept →
vertigo	13–2	0.02	15%	14 Sept →
vertigo	13–4	0.04	20%	14 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.01	15%	8 Sept →
vertigo	13–3	-0.01	8%	1 Sept →
vertigo	13–1	-0.03	17%	1 Sept →
vertigo	13–7	-0.03	18%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.03	6%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.01	16%	22 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	7%	21 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	0%	21 Aug →