ZuNkEnn

ZuNkEnn — CS2 Stats

NO76561197997796471[U:1:37530743]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,941Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
10,350Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20038 of 242713 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−302Premier CS Rating · 25,302 → 25,000
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 29 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 -1,967 30 May – 24 Sept · 13 days played
24,57126,967peak 26,96730 May24 Sept
27,207Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,508Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-05-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,967 below peak (26,967)
  • -511 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=28,192), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate51.8%51.0%
Shot accuracy13.9%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.021.09
Match win rate48.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZuNkEnnFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,508csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning72
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateLLLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.9
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning7.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time501ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 501ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 9 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · cache, 7 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 11 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 54% over 13infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB189–950%0.05
infernoD165–1131%0.04
ancientB158–753%0.06
cacheB137–654%0.04
nukeC125–742%0.05
dust2C114–736%0.04
anubisC94–544%0.06
overpass—31–233%0.03
vertigo—21–150%0.01
boulder—10–10%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

363,090Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
12,168Matches
48.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
51.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
45,048MVPs
7,418Hours (in match)
13,755Bombs planted
6,612Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47147,629
AWP41,036
Glock-1810,118
Knife7,523
P2506,312
MP94,200

Lifetime map wins

26,129inferno
16,922dust2
13,023nuke
9,004vertigo
5,988train
2,527cbble
263office
216lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,627Matches
50%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
94.5ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage36848%1.2418.4
Ancient28553%1.2919.6
Anubis21248%1.2519.0
Inferno21246%1.2118.6
Dust220042%1.2418.3
Nuke16758%1.3620.3
Vertigo16056%1.3119.2
Train6849%1.4022.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.3%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
491msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
55.6%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
9.43HE damage / grenade
7.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.402 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0530%24 Sept →
cache6–130.0028%24 Sept →
cache14–160.0017%23 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0412%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0425%13 Sept →
ancient13–110.1329%13 Sept →
cache13–50.1635%12 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0117%12 Sept →
mirage5–30.0113%12 Sept →
anubis10–130.0818%12 Sept →
nuke13–90.1526%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0123%11 Sept →
inferno13–20.1025%11 Sept →
ancient7–130.0713%10 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0423%10 Sept →
anubis13–70.2115%9 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0128%9 Sept →
inferno22–190.0124%9 Sept →
ancient13–90.1216%7 Sept →
anubis13–40.1626%7 Sept →
cache13–40.0250%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0229%6 Sept →
ancient13–100.0932%1 Sept →
cache7–130.0828%1 Sept →
inferno7–130.0317%1 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0224%30 Aug →
mirage13–60.1223%30 Aug →
cache13–20.0631%30 Aug →
nuke13–60.1329%28 Aug →
cache13–100.0126%28 Aug →
ancient14–160.0433%18 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0233%18 Aug →
cache9–130.0115%14 Aug →
inferno13–50.0431%14 Aug →
ancient16–140.1026%14 Aug →
mirage13–90.0424%14 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0120%14 Aug →
nuke13–60.0320%14 Aug →
dust26–130.0123%10 Aug →
inferno11–130.0919%7 Aug →
dust213–60.0025%7 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0116%7 Aug →
nuke13–110.1026%7 Aug →
boulder9–130.0632%18 Jul →
mirage13–70.0823%18 Jul →
ancient13–40.0415%7 Jul →
inferno7–130.0831%7 Jul →
overpass4–80.0415%6 Jul →
dust29–130.0932%6 Jul →
ancient13–110.1034%6 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0424%30 Jun →
ancient13–70.0616%30 Jun →
dust213–30.1626%30 Jun →
mirage13–90.0215%29 Jun →
ancient11–130.0416%29 Jun →
overpass16–120.0532%29 Jun →
nuke8–13-0.0021%27 Jun →
ancient1–80.0727%27 Jun →
anubis8–130.0222%26 Jun →
mirage11–130.0823%26 Jun →
inferno13–60.1824%26 Jun →
dust211–130.1237%26 Jun →
dust24–90.0417%25 Jun →
nuke4–130.0320%25 Jun →
nuke9–130.0633%24 Jun →
mirage13–50.1629%24 Jun →
ancient10–130.0218%23 Jun →
nuke1–13-0.0227%21 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0117%21 Jun →
anubis13–90.0721%15 Jun →
cache2–130.0221%15 Jun →
inferno9–130.1042%15 Jun →
nuke7–130.0930%12 Jun →
mirage9–130.0220%12 Jun →
nuke0–90.000%8 Jun →
vertigo7–13-0.0330%8 Jun →
inferno12–120.0226%8 Jun →
mirage10–130.0629%8 Jun →
cache13–80.0223%8 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0130%4 Jun →
cache13–70.0926%4 Jun →
inferno6–130.0428%4 Jun →
mirage8–130.0319%4 Jun →
anubis13–60.0431%4 Jun →
mirage8–130.0634%31 May →
cache12–120.0835%31 May →
nuke4–130.0528%31 May →
anubis1–13-0.0832%30 May →
mirage11–130.0621%30 May →
overpass2–13-0.0126%30 May →
ancient13–60.0523%30 May →
mirage5–130.0819%30 May →
inferno11–130.0624%30 May →
anubis9–130.0217%30 May →
cache13–60.0323%30 May →
nuke13–8-0.0116%30 May →
mirage13–90.0325%30 May →
inferno13–70.0118%29 May →
ancient4–13-0.0524%29 May →
vertigo13–80.0526%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →