ZeRostyle!

ZeRostyle! — CS2 Stats

NO76561197985509541[U:1:25243813]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,038Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,140Top 10% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18332 of 242650 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,782 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,140 +1,375 27 Jul – 10 Sept · 21 days played
23,76526,120peak 26,12027 Jul10 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,782 +0 28 Aug – 2 Sept · 2 observations
1,7821,782peak 1,78228 Aug2 Sept
26,346Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,782Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,782
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 219 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 980 below peak (26,120)
  • +140 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,860 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZeRostyle!FACEITLevel 8 · 1,782 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,140 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,782csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning58
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 452ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.8
Utility7.1
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time471ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 471ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 3 Sept →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 3–1 · nuke, 2 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 11 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC219–1243%-0.01
nukeB2010–1050%0.00
infernoB168–850%-0.01
anubisB126–650%0.00
cacheS128–467%0.01
dust2B105–550%-0.00
mirage—32–167%-0.05
vertigo—21–150%-0.04
eldorado—10–10%-0.12
poseidon—10–10%-0.20
debris—11–0100%0.06
overpass—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,161Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10844%1.0414.5
Ancient10755%1.0315.1
Nuke8751%1.0515.3
Dust28144%0.9413.3
Anubis6853%0.9514.0
Mirage4747%0.9214.6
Overpass3050%1.0215.6
Cache2564%0.9813.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
489msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
9.55HE damage / grenade
14.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.5118% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0518%18 Sept →
inferno16–12-0.0412%17 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0518%10 Sept →
inferno13–50.0316%10 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0327%10 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.079%10 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0110%9 Sept →
ancient13–110.0121%9 Sept →
inferno22–19-0.0219%9 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0315%8 Sept →
mirage0–3-0.060%8 Sept →
nuke2–3-0.060%7 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0212%7 Sept →
anubis13–40.0017%7 Sept →
cache13–40.0712%7 Sept →
cache13–20.0412%7 Sept →
ancient13–70.1215%3 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0313%3 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0210%3 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.039%3 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0113%3 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0013%2 Sept →
nuke13–100.0412%1 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0421%1 Sept →
cache13–9-0.009%1 Sept →
ancient17–190.0023%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0219%31 Aug →
dust213–40.037%31 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0516%24 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0521%24 Aug →
nuke13–30.0517%20 Aug →
anubis9–130.0214%20 Aug →
ancient14–160.0313%18 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0315%18 Aug →
nuke13–70.0718%18 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0317%14 Aug →
inferno13–50.0924%14 Aug →
ancient16–14-0.0213%14 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0523%14 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0114%14 Aug →
nuke13–60.0125%14 Aug →
inferno7–130.0224%12 Aug →
eldorado5–9-0.1211%12 Aug →
poseidon1–9-0.206%12 Aug →
debris9–50.0611%12 Aug →
nuke4–130.0222%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0214%11 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0415%11 Aug →
nuke4–130.0217%11 Aug →
overpass13–80.0216%11 Aug →
vertigo1–13-0.1317%10 Aug →
anubis13–90.0410%10 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0312%10 Aug →
nuke2–11-0.0717%10 Aug →
inferno13–40.0514%9 Aug →
dust213–50.0418%9 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0118%9 Aug →
anubis9–130.0618%9 Aug →
inferno11–130.0013%7 Aug →
ancient13–110.008%7 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0217%7 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0511%7 Aug →
cache19–16-0.0122%6 Aug →
cache10–130.0315%6 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0515%6 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0314%3 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0416%3 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0821%3 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0113%3 Aug →
cache13–80.0316%3 Aug →
ancient9–3-0.0025%3 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0117%2 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.048%2 Aug →
nuke10–130.0215%2 Aug →
nuke3–1-0.0633%2 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0212%1 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.026%1 Aug →
nuke13–60.1021%1 Aug →
nuke15–150.0213%1 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.049%31 Jul →
cache13–50.0311%31 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.075%31 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0416%31 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0311%30 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0411%30 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0214%30 Jul →
dust213–90.0618%30 Jul →
ancient8–40.0814%30 Jul →
inferno13–60.0112%30 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0013%30 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.057%30 Jul →
nuke13–70.0519%30 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.028%30 Jul →
ancient10–130.0419%29 Jul →
dust22–0-0.040%29 Jul →
dust215–150.0420%29 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0413%28 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0010%27 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0412%27 Jul →
anubis13–50.0115%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →