holmen

holmen — CS2 Stats

76561197986294636[U:1:26028908]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,221Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,558Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91358 of 257905 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,558 -1,183 6 Aug – 19 Oct · 26 days played
18,65121,518peak 21,5186 Aug19 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,373 +0 3 Sept – 24 Sept · 4 observations
1,3731,373peak 1,3733 Sept24 Sept
21,878Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,373Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,373
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 158 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,960 below peak (21,518)
  • -854 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 442 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGholmenFACEITLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,558 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,373csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning67
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateWLTLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · 0ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility6.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 75% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 75% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning6.7
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time578ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy26.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 14 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · ancient, 2 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 17 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 59% over 17mirageWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2710–1737%-0.02
nukeA1710–759%-0.00
ancientC156–940%-0.01
anubisB157–847%-0.02
cacheA148–657%0.01
mirageD82–625%-0.02
dust2—30–30%-0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

935Matches
50%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
71.4ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12151%1.0615.2
Anubis9149%0.9914.0
Ancient7854%1.0514.7
Inferno7545%1.0514.7
Nuke4961%1.1116.0
Dust24852%0.9814.8
Vertigo4641%0.9413.8
Overpass1567%0.9113.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
576msReaction time
75.0%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
13.06HE damage / grenade
5.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.937% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–1-0.0463%26 Oct →
ancient4–130.0335%26 Oct →
cache12–120.0021%26 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0723%25 Oct →
cache13–60.0313%19 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0627%19 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0037%19 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0734%17 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0215%17 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0421%17 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0528%16 Oct →
mirage13–80.0228%16 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0128%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0026%11 Oct →
nuke13–90.0125%11 Oct →
inferno13–70.0624%10 Oct →
nuke11–130.0314%10 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0126%10 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0319%9 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0131%9 Oct →
nuke13–110.0331%8 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0821%8 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0615%7 Oct →
nuke13–60.0129%7 Oct →
dust29–130.0115%5 Oct →
anubis13–60.0422%5 Oct →
inferno13–100.0134%5 Oct →
mirage15–150.0221%4 Oct →
inferno6–130.0328%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0028%3 Oct →
cache13–80.0636%3 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0641%3 Oct →
cache13–110.0231%2 Oct →
ancient0–13-0.11100%2 Oct →
dust24–13-0.1031%2 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0722%2 Oct →
anubis13–60.0139%30 Sept →
cache5–130.0020%30 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0329%29 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0322%29 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0031%28 Sept →
nuke8–20.0839%28 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0214%28 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0419%26 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0124%26 Sept →
inferno13–90.0745%25 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0115%25 Sept →
nuke9–130.0247%23 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0139%22 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0721%22 Sept →
ancient13–80.0632%22 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0341%21 Sept →
inferno11–130.0241%20 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0318%19 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0330%19 Sept →
ancient4–130.0435%19 Sept →
cache9–130.0823%19 Sept →
ancient13–70.0230%18 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0239%18 Sept →
cache10–130.0027%16 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0213%16 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0614%15 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0430%14 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0131%14 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0435%9 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0024%8 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0935%8 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0318%6 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0031%6 Sept →
overpass13–80.0324%5 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0138%5 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0631%3 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0419%3 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0316%3 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0445%3 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0336%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0720%31 Aug →
inferno13–80.0031%31 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0153%19 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0235%19 Aug →
nuke13–70.0120%18 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0015%17 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0114%17 Aug →
nuke5–130.0126%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0719%14 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0312%14 Aug →
nuke13–30.0928%14 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0716%14 Aug →
ancient13–40.0526%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0423%9 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0333%9 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0126%7 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0233%7 Aug →
cache19–160.0133%6 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0242%6 Aug →
cache13–60.0726%6 Aug →
inferno1–70.0625%6 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0123%5 Aug →
anubis13–40.0617%5 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0026%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.