holmen

holmen — CS2 Stats

76561197986294636[U:1:26028908]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,162Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,091Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#77016 of 242715 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,091 +3,312 3 Jul – 20 Sept · 25 days played
16,47921,518peak 21,5183 Jul20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,373 +0 3 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
1,3731,373peak 1,3733 Sept18 Sept
21,878Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,373Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,373
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 158 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,427 below peak (21,518)
  • -1,427 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,312 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,909 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGholmenFACEITLevel 7 · 1,373 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,091 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,373csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning44
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 36%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time594ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy30.3%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 32.9% → last ⅓ avg 30.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 24 Jul →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 4 Jul →
484msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 19 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 76% over 21mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC238–1535%0.00
nukeS2116–576%0.01
ancientC167–944%0.00
cacheA148–657%0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.02
mirageD71–614%-0.01
dust2—42–250%0.01
overpass—21–150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

909Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
71.4ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11950%1.0615.2
Anubis8751%1.0114.3
Ancient7654%1.0514.7
Inferno7046%1.0514.8
Dust24753%0.9814.8
Vertigo4641%0.9413.8
Nuke4163%1.1316.2
Overpass1567%0.9113.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.1%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
597msReaction time
42.8%T opening success
31.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
7.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.6689% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–130.0247%23 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0139%22 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0721%22 Sept →
ancient13–80.0632%22 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0341%21 Sept →
inferno11–130.0241%20 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0318%19 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.0330%19 Sept →
ancient4–130.0435%19 Sept →
cache9–130.0823%19 Sept →
ancient13–70.0230%18 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0239%18 Sept →
cache10–130.0027%16 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0213%16 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0614%15 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0430%14 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0131%14 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0435%9 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0024%8 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0935%8 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0318%6 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0031%6 Sept →
overpass13–80.0324%5 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0138%5 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0631%3 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0419%3 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0316%3 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0445%3 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0336%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0720%31 Aug →
inferno13–80.0031%31 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0153%19 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0235%19 Aug →
nuke13–70.0120%18 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0015%17 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0114%17 Aug →
nuke5–130.0126%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0719%14 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0312%14 Aug →
nuke13–30.0928%14 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0716%14 Aug →
ancient13–40.0526%11 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0423%9 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0333%9 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0126%7 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0233%7 Aug →
cache19–160.0133%6 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0242%6 Aug →
cache13–60.0726%6 Aug →
inferno1–70.0625%6 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0123%5 Aug →
anubis13–40.0617%5 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0026%5 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0239%5 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0225%3 Aug →
anubis13–20.0527%3 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0133%3 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0516%2 Aug →
nuke13–80.0130%2 Aug →
cache7–130.0133%1 Aug →
inferno7–130.0425%1 Aug →
nuke13–60.0328%1 Aug →
ancient16–120.0238%31 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0511%31 Jul →
nuke13–80.0944%30 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0222%30 Jul →
dust213–90.0130%30 Jul →
ancient8–4-0.0315%30 Jul →
inferno13–60.0530%30 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0047%30 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0132%30 Jul →
nuke16–140.0124%29 Jul →
inferno3–130.0146%26 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0434%26 Jul →
inferno15–150.0228%25 Jul →
inferno16–130.0435%25 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0023%25 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0232%25 Jul →
ancient8–130.0449%25 Jul →
nuke13–70.0347%24 Jul →
mirage16–140.0830%24 Jul →
inferno13–50.1438%24 Jul →
nuke13–80.0917%23 Jul →
inferno13–50.0436%23 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0034%22 Jul →
cache16–140.0630%22 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.0128%22 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0125%22 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0331%20 Jul →
mirage15–150.0131%20 Jul →
cache13–160.0341%20 Jul →
dust29–130.0321%19 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0457%4 Jul →
ancient11–130.0428%4 Jul →
dust213–50.0030%4 Jul →
overpass6–13-0.0025%4 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0429%4 Jul →
nuke16–120.0244%4 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0442%3 Jul →
nuke13–50.0725%3 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →