nipaniilo — CS2 Stats

ZW76561197996539438[U:1:36273710]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

313Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

560Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 313 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 -2,043 9 May – 2 Jul · 27 days played

22,945Peak Premier in tracked matches

28Days played since 2026-05-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	44.7%	43.8%	44.8%	meets
Shot accuracy	15.8%	12.0%	12.4%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.00	1.02	1.04	0.03 short
Match win rate	43.4%	44.7%	45.2%	1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52

Positioning47

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLWLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

5–5 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

8–11–1 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 14%
Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim5.2

Utility4.2

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels1.3

Clutch7.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2

Positioning4.7

Utility4.2

Mechanics3.1

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time584ms−25ms

first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy15.0%−2.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 19 May →

40%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · mirage, 3 Jun →

375msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · mirage, 3 Jun →

13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 51% over 39dust2Weakest map · 33% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	39	20–19	51%	0.00
dust2	D	24	8–16	33%	0.00
inferno	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.01
nuke	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.02
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,193Lifetime kills

1.00K/D

1,600Matches

43.4%Match win rate

44.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players

15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players

3,458MVPs

560Hours (in match)

1,775Bombs planted

421Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-478,813

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,464

AWP3,258

P2000 / USP-S1,851

AUG1,364

Desert Eagle1,359

Glock-18836

SSG 08533

Nova524

Knife508

Lifetime map wins

1,262nuke

1,243inferno

914dust2

722vertigo

201train

168lake

78office

43cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches

58%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

69.3ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

56%1v1 clutch win

11%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	6	67%	0.90	15.7
Mirage	5	80%	0.86	12.8
Vertigo	2	0%	0.60	10.5
Nuke	2	100%	1.08	16.0
Dust2	1	0%	0.60	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.3%Spray accuracy

63.7%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

594msReaction time

19.0%T opening success

50.9%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

2.0%Flash assists

9.15HE damage / grenade

3.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.2768% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.0629 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.9796% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	10–13	0.04	13%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	13%	16 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.04	19%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	22%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.06	19%	2 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	11%	30 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	20%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.09	7%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	8%	29 Jun →
inferno	11–6	-0.03	18%	29 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	15%	28 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.00	13%	28 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	7%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	11%	25 Jun →
mirage	0–6	-0.00	17%	11 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	10%	11 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	12%	10 Jun →
inferno	3–9	-0.19	10%	10 Jun →
mirage	9–5	0.03	21%	10 Jun →
mirage	6–4	0.02	26%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	21%	10 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.03	27%	8 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.05	14%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	12%	7 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	10%	7 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	10%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	13%	6 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	13%	6 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.00	24%	6 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	6%	6 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	11%	6 Jun →
inferno	5–13	0.01	22%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	24%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.06	28%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	24%	4 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.03	26%	4 Jun →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	28%	3 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	16%	3 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	18%	3 Jun →
mirage	3–0	0.11	40%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.09	17%	3 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.02	14%	31 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	13%	31 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	8%	31 May →
dust2	13–10	0.00	24%	31 May →
inferno	6–13	0.00	19%	31 May →
mirage	9–13	0.04	12%	31 May →
nuke	13–8	0.04	15%	30 May →
inferno	13–11	0.05	28%	30 May →
dust2	13–5	0.03	17%	30 May →
mirage	13–5	0.06	17%	30 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	19%	30 May →
nuke	1–13	-0.08	22%	29 May →
mirage	16–12	0.00	20%	29 May →
dust2	13–11	0.03	22%	29 May →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	7%	29 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	18%	29 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	15%	29 May →
dust2	13–4	0.00	20%	29 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	11%	24 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	25%	24 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.00	8%	23 May →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	26%	23 May →
inferno	12–16	-0.04	17%	23 May →
mirage	13–11	0.03	12%	23 May →
mirage	11–13	0.00	21%	23 May →
dust2	13–3	0.01	16%	23 May →
inferno	11–13	0.01	14%	23 May →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	22%	23 May →
inferno	1–8	-0.02	29%	22 May →
inferno	13–8	0.08	6%	22 May →
dust2	13–9	0.10	19%	22 May →
mirage	15–15	0.03	15%	21 May →
dust2	7–13	0.01	12%	21 May →
mirage	13–5	0.01	25%	21 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	11%	19 May →
dust2	13–8	0.15	20%	19 May →
nuke	16–12	-0.03	22%	18 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	12%	18 May →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	17%	18 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	27%	13 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	11%	13 May →
dust2	5–13	0.02	19%	13 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	17%	13 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	24%	12 May →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	19%	12 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	17%	11 May →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	10%	11 May →
nuke	13–8	-0.08	8%	10 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	10%	10 May →
nuke	12–12	0.02	8%	9 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	27%	9 May →
mirage	13–2	0.07	23%	9 May →
nuke	10–13	0.01	21%	9 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	19%	9 May →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	19%	9 May →
inferno	3–11	-0.03	24%	9 May →
inferno	13–8	0.02	14%	9 May →
dust2	9–13	0.04	12%	9 May →
mirage	13–4	0.02	17%	9 May →