Luckerdor

Luckerdor — CS2 Stats

DE76561197995481921[U:1:35216193]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,395Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,635Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,906Top 25% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#33261 of 259139 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,906 -1,211 7 Sept – 28 Oct · 33 days played
23,26425,395peak 25,3957 Sept28 Oct
25,501Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,489 below peak (25,395)
  • -545 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,094 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate48.7%48.2%50.9%2.2% short
Shot accuracy12.2%13.2%13.7%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.071.09meets
Match win rate51.0%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLuckerdorFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,906 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning63
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–56–4Last 10040%Win rateLLTLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility7.5
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch4.2

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning6.3
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time552ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–0 · inferno, 2 Oct →
86%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · inferno, 2 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 17 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC219–1243%-0.01
ancientD195–1426%-0.02
nukeS1813–572%-0.01
dust2D124–833%0.00
anubisD113–827%-0.01
cacheD93–633%0.00
mirageD71–614%-0.03
fachwerk—11–0100%0.04
rush_001—11–0100%0.07
overpass—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

104,276Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
5,133Matches
51.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
48.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12.2%Shot accuracy
14,784MVPs
2,330Hours (in match)
9,330Bombs planted
1,565Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4734,477
AWP9,653
P2503,790
MAC-103,556
MP93,164
SSG 082,174

Lifetime map wins

19,103inferno
6,992dust2
6,297nuke
2,102train
675vertigo
525cbble
274lake
167office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

301Matches
55%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
76.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno933%1.0116.6
Nuke875%1.0413.8
Ancient757%1.0112.9
Anubis475%1.2621.3
Cache367%1.7424.7
Dust230%0.427.0
Mirage1100%1.6213.0
Overpass10%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
559msReaction time
51.0%T opening success
48.1%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
10.54HE damage / grenade
15.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0811%28 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0415%28 Oct →
dust215–150.0730%28 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0420%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0117%27 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0119%27 Oct →
nuke13–100.0230%27 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0618%27 Oct →
anubis5–130.0311%26 Oct →
anubis13–90.0623%26 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0119%26 Oct →
inferno13–110.0021%26 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0122%24 Oct →
fachwerk13–70.0415%22 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0511%19 Oct →
dust23–130.0228%19 Oct →
nuke13–80.0219%18 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0213%18 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0218%18 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.079%17 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0150%17 Oct →
inferno13–50.0146%17 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0518%17 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0421%16 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0225%13 Oct →
mirage15–150.0527%13 Oct →
inferno13–20.0529%13 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.1026%12 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0215%12 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0711%12 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0629%12 Oct →
inferno8–130.0619%11 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0714%11 Oct →
nuke13–80.0416%11 Oct →
inferno10–130.0224%11 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0217%11 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0519%11 Oct →
rush_0014–00.0711%8 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0622%7 Oct →
inferno10–130.0222%7 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0423%7 Oct →
inferno10–20.0620%7 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0714%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0631%6 Oct →
ancient13–20.0013%6 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0329%6 Oct →
overpass5–9-0.1223%5 Oct →
inferno9–30.0831%5 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.2738%5 Oct →
dust213–50.0443%5 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0811%2 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0021%2 Oct →
inferno9–00.1086%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0214%1 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0533%1 Oct →
ancient4–130.0033%1 Oct →
dust27–130.0132%30 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0033%30 Sept →
dust24–130.0039%30 Sept →
ancient13–40.1037%30 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.055%29 Sept →
inferno16–120.0119%29 Sept →
nuke13–50.0319%29 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.1119%27 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0524%27 Sept →
dust213–90.0119%24 Sept →
cache14–160.0228%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0024%23 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0218%23 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0319%23 Sept →
ancient10–130.0421%23 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0631%23 Sept →
nuke19–17-0.0114%21 Sept →
nuke10–130.0218%21 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0120%20 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0116%19 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0421%18 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0420%18 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0322%18 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0220%17 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0021%17 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0510%17 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0325%17 Sept →
anubis13–100.0314%15 Sept →
cache13–11-0.009%15 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0210%15 Sept →
dust25–130.0215%14 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0222%14 Sept →
ancient13–80.0227%14 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0224%13 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0518%13 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0126%11 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0336%11 Sept →
ancient5–130.0823%9 Sept →
cache15–150.0925%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0617%8 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0032%8 Sept →
nuke13–110.0118%7 Sept →
anubis13–110.0428%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0817%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.