mrkmkz — CS2 Stats

DE76561197994204729[U:1:33939001]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

466Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,384Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning53

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–45–9Last 10046%Win rateLLWTTLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression9.4

Utility5.8

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels3.5

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning5.3

Utility5.8

Mechanics4.5

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time525ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms

Headshot accuracy12.7%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 13–5

13–0Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 16% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	32	17–15	53%	0.01
inferno	D	19	3–16	16%	0.00
ancient	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
mirage	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.01
dust2	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (16% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.3%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.0%Spray accuracy

70.4%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

524msReaction time

35.2%T opening success

52.9%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

4.1%Flash assists

6.77HE damage / grenade

11.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.2904% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.1565% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

16% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	9–13	-0.04	12%	30 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	16%	30 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	17%	29 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.05	8%	29 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.04	20%	27 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.03	12%	27 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	10%	26 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	18%	26 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.04	16%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	15%	23 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.07	13%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	4%	22 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	2%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	11%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	6%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.07	8%	17 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	7%	17 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.01	14%	17 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	15%	16 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.07	10%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–16	0.00	14%	15 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.03	14%	14 Aug →
mirage	12–4	0.03	9%	10 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	9%	10 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	9%	10 Aug →
nuke	1–13	0.02	21%	9 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.09	20%	8 Aug →
cache	13–0	-0.01	8%	8 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.08	11%	8 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.05	15%	7 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	14%	7 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.02	23%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	17%	6 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.02	13%	5 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.01	11%	5 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	11%	5 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.11	9%	5 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	10%	28 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.02	13%	28 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.02	21%	28 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	15%	28 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.01	20%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.06	7%	27 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	7%	26 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.04	9%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	10%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	15%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.00	5%	26 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.02	9%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.04	10%	25 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	5%	25 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.08	6%	25 Jul →
cache	8–2	0.03	10%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	11%	25 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.02	0%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.00	6%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	11%	23 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.05	11%	23 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	9%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.07	26%	22 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.02	10%	21 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.04	9%	21 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.10	13%	21 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.05	11%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.00	10%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	3%	20 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	4%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.01	19%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.01	11%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	7%	19 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.01	14%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	12%	18 Jul →
inferno	12–16	0.03	15%	17 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	10%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.02	5%	17 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.01	23%	17 Jul →
cache	10–3	0.04	14%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	15%	17 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	9%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.08	13%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	17%	16 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	12%	15 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	15%	14 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	20%	13 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.11	17%	13 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.02	10%	13 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	16%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.00	7%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.03	7%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	15%	12 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.07	10%	12 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.02	10%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	33%	12 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.00	2%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.10	9%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	17%	10 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	23%	10 Jul →