N1c0da

N1c0da — CS2 Stats

76561198159611001[U:1:199345273]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,076Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,196Purple band · top ~19.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30575 of 59362 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGN1c0daPREMIER17,196 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning44
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY493912Last 10049%Win rateLWTLWWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression4.1
Utility5.4
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.9

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time583ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — debris 9–3
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
103In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 29% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2214864%-0.01
infernoD2161529%-0.03
anubisC167944%-0.01
nukeC104640%-0.02
mirageS107370%-0.02
ancientA106460%-0.02
dust2A74357%-0.04
poseidon2020%-0.17
eldorado1010%0.01
debris110100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

835Matches
51%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
73.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2352%1.1515.1
Dust22339%0.8914.7
Ancient2245%0.7413.4
Mirage1644%0.8414.6
Nuke1275%0.9013.9
Train1050%0.8613.7
Anubis1050%1.0115.6
Overpass786%0.7811.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
573msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
34.0%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
8.61HE damage / grenade
6.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8411% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0319%30 Aug
cache13–10-0.059%29 Aug
cache15–150.0212%29 Aug
nuke5–13-0.1014%29 Aug
cache13–10-0.0613%28 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0614%28 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0411%28 Aug
eldorado8–80.0112%27 Aug
poseidon2–9-0.1324%27 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0210%27 Aug
cache13–3-0.0220%27 Aug
dust215–15-0.0618%27 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0111%27 Aug
anubis13–60.0516%23 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0711%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0818%23 Aug
mirage13–110.0411%22 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0226%22 Aug
ancient13–9-0.029%22 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0431%21 Aug
inferno11–130.0221%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0421%21 Aug
mirage13–40.0319%21 Aug
nuke8–130.0410%19 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0511%16 Aug
cache6–13-0.0320%16 Aug
anubis13–160.0214%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0317%15 Aug
anubis13–10.1317%15 Aug
cache8–130.0127%15 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0514%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.079%14 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0213%14 Aug
mirage12–4-0.0114%10 Aug
ancient13–00.0713%10 Aug
dust213–8-0.0714%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.0512%8 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0013%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.0412%5 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0926%5 Aug
cache13–110.0114%5 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1014%5 Aug
cache7–13-0.074%4 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0520%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.0616%4 Aug
inferno10–13-0.068%4 Aug
cache13–5-0.0212%2 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0417%2 Aug
cache13–40.0919%1 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0618%1 Aug
inferno13–80.0212%1 Aug
cache13–100.0217%1 Aug
anubis13–11-0.086%31 Jul
dust213–3-0.0410%31 Jul
inferno13–16-0.057%31 Jul
anubis13–60.0224%31 Jul
cache13–9-0.0014%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0529%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.0414%30 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0216%30 Jul
nuke10–130.0116%30 Jul
inferno9–130.0120%28 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0216%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0612%26 Jul
cache15–15-0.0116%26 Jul
dust213–8-0.0316%26 Jul
ancient1–13-0.096%25 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0310%25 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0220%25 Jul
cache13–50.0216%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0016%24 Jul
cache15–15-0.0124%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0125%24 Jul
mirage15–150.0218%24 Jul
poseidon1–9-0.2110%24 Jul
debris9–30.1723%24 Jul
ancient13–110.0023%23 Jul
anubis13–40.0618%23 Jul
inferno13–60.0018%23 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0317%23 Jul
inferno15–150.0317%22 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0514%21 Jul
cache13–1-0.0318%21 Jul
inferno15–150.0216%21 Jul
dust213–70.0619%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0117%20 Jul
cache13–110.0225%19 Jul
nuke15–150.0421%19 Jul
cache13–30.0418%19 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0015%19 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0514%19 Jul
anubis13–0-0.088%19 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0822%17 Jul
nuke13–40.0124%17 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0716%17 Jul
cache10–30.0026%17 Jul
anubis7–130.0022%16 Jul
nuke13–30.0022%16 Jul
inferno7–13-0.1012%16 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0413%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →