XoniC

XoniC — CS2 Stats

76561197993100672[U:1:32834944]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,854Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,090Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating12,321Blue band · top ~42.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,321 -356 25 Jul – 28 Sept · 30 days played
11,80516,059peak 16,05925 Jul28 Sept
16,059Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-07-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,738 below peak (16,059)
  • -1,037 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,679 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.1%43.7%44.8%3.7% short
Shot accuracy19.6%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.161.021.03above
Match win rate52.5%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXoniCFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,321 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning45
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateLLLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −74ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time600ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 686ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+4.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 28 Jul →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 21 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · nuke, 28 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L7Current streak
7–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB209–1145%0.02
nukeD196–1332%-0.02
ancientC156–940%-0.01
anubisB136–746%-0.01
cacheA138–562%0.01
mirageB115–645%0.04
dust2S86–275%0.00
office—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

139,830Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
7,368Matches
52.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 5 players
41.1%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 5 players
20,158MVPs
2,749Hours (in match)
5,183Bombs planted
1,294Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,008
AWP22,497
P906,179
MAC-103,902
FAMAS2,318

Lifetime map wins

12,408inferno
9,324nuke
8,703dust2
3,283cbble
1,845vertigo
1,647train
1,359office
346lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

382Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
—ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient250%0.9411.5
Anubis10%0.132.0
Mirage1100%1.8220.0
Nuke10%0.6511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
602msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
15.67HE damage / grenade
7.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1879% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0111%28 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0128%15 Sept →
mirage8–130.0017%14 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0114%28 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.078%28 Aug →
office10–13-0.0028%28 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1311%28 Aug →
ancient13–80.0614%28 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0423%28 Aug →
mirage13–80.0918%27 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0920%27 Aug →
anubis16–140.0218%26 Aug →
nuke13–110.0021%26 Aug →
inferno13–60.1414%26 Aug →
anubis7–130.0216%25 Aug →
mirage13–110.0010%25 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0314%24 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0418%24 Aug →
dust213–20.0126%24 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0323%24 Aug →
mirage13–00.1721%24 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0713%24 Aug →
mirage11–130.0410%21 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0111%21 Aug →
inferno13–50.0614%21 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0310%21 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0516%21 Aug →
mirage6–130.0231%21 Aug →
cache13–70.0029%21 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0211%21 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0720%21 Aug →
inferno11–130.018%20 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0214%20 Aug →
inferno13–60.0111%20 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0517%20 Aug →
inferno8–80.0114%20 Aug →
dust210–130.029%20 Aug →
nuke8–130.024%20 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0513%20 Aug →
nuke16–130.0324%20 Aug →
inferno3–9-0.1213%20 Aug →
inferno9–7-0.1118%20 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0617%20 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0111%19 Aug →
inferno9–130.0520%19 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.017%19 Aug →
inferno13–50.0817%19 Aug →
ancient9–130.0211%19 Aug →
cache15–150.0111%19 Aug →
inferno15–150.026%19 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.045%18 Aug →
cache11–13-0.054%18 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0313%17 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0120%16 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0424%16 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0316%15 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0114%15 Aug →
nuke16–12-0.0511%13 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0227%13 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0214%12 Aug →
inferno13–100.0712%12 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.048%11 Aug →
dust213–6-0.046%11 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0118%10 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0713%10 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.069%9 Aug →
ancient11–130.0111%9 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0114%9 Aug →
cache13–70.0110%9 Aug →
ancient11–130.017%5 Aug →
cache10–130.029%5 Aug →
nuke14–160.0511%5 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0216%5 Aug →
mirage15–150.0217%4 Aug →
dust25–130.0110%4 Aug →
anubis8–130.004%4 Aug →
cache13–80.089%4 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0412%4 Aug →
dust213–70.0010%3 Aug →
ancient13–100.019%1 Aug →
nuke13–110.035%1 Aug →
ancient13–110.0310%1 Aug →
cache13–40.074%1 Aug →
cache13–100.0420%1 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0115%31 Jul →
ancient13–20.0118%31 Jul →
mirage13–30.1618%31 Jul →
dust213–70.0513%31 Jul →
inferno9–50.1425%30 Jul →
nuke5–9-0.1015%30 Jul →
mirage13–80.0516%29 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.019%29 Jul →
anubis13–90.0111%28 Jul →
nuke8–8-0.009%28 Jul →
inferno9–30.2015%28 Jul →
inferno9–10.1825%28 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0210%26 Jul →
anubis10–130.0111%26 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0811%26 Jul →
cache13–100.046%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.