Banks.

Banks. — CS2 Stats

AU76561197992918971[U:1:32653243]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,892Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,343Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,535Purple band · top ~14.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,396 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,535 -1,465 31 May – 27 Sept · 27 days played
14,28020,287peak 20,28731 May27 Sept
20,562Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,396Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-05-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,396
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,752 below peak (20,287)
  • +390 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,544 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,465 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.7%43.7%44.8%3.1% short
Shot accuracy14.9%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.241.021.03above
Match win rate45.0%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBanks.FACEITLevel 5 · 1,396 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,535 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,396csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning56
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −90ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time563ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy13.1%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 25 Jul →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · mirage, 28 Jun →
398msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 17 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 3 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%0.02
nukeC198–1142%0.01
infernoS1812–667%0.01
ancientA148–657%0.01
dust2A95–456%0.02
anubisC83–538%0.01
cacheC52–340%0.00
overpass—41–325%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,334Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
3,599Matches
45.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
41.7%Headshot %
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
6,647MVPs
1,343Hours (in match)
3,139Bombs planted
822Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,777
AWP7,805
MP72,886
SSG 082,024
P2501,316

Lifetime map wins

6,786inferno
3,862nuke
1,396dust2
1,037train
237vertigo
217cbble
190office
67lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

302Matches
50%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
83.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7845%1.1116.4
Inferno5946%1.2416.7
Nuke5668%1.2517.3
Ancient3560%0.9714.7
Anubis2839%0.9914.2
Dust22241%1.0616.6
Train956%0.9014.6
Cache425%0.8214.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
551msReaction time
42.7%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
6.83HE damage / grenade
7.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2725% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0411%27 Sept →
nuke13–110.0424%12 Sept →
inferno13–90.0211%12 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0326%21 Aug →
cache13–110.0216%17 Aug →
cache4–13-0.064%17 Aug →
mirage4–130.017%17 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.058%16 Aug →
nuke13–60.0815%16 Aug →
dust213–30.1017%11 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.039%7 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0216%5 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0018%5 Aug →
inferno13–90.037%5 Aug →
anubis13–90.0010%4 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.028%4 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0012%4 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0214%3 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.019%3 Aug →
nuke13–20.1117%3 Aug →
ancient15–150.039%2 Aug →
inferno13–100.0012%2 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.018%2 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0510%1 Aug →
mirage13–60.0315%1 Aug →
mirage11–130.0118%1 Aug →
ancient13–100.0714%1 Aug →
nuke13–80.0417%1 Aug →
dust213–100.0315%1 Aug →
inferno14–160.0520%31 Jul →
mirage13–110.0610%31 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0213%31 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0214%31 Jul →
inferno13–60.0910%30 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.056%30 Jul →
dust29–130.0220%29 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0614%29 Jul →
nuke10–130.0411%28 Jul →
cache7–130.0023%28 Jul →
inferno13–70.027%27 Jul →
inferno13–90.036%26 Jul →
nuke13–90.046%26 Jul →
ancient3–130.0416%26 Jul →
cache10–130.028%26 Jul →
dust213–50.0418%26 Jul →
mirage13–40.0125%26 Jul →
mirage13–160.0210%25 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0611%25 Jul →
ancient13–60.1312%25 Jul →
nuke9–130.039%25 Jul →
anubis11–130.0920%21 Jul →
ancient5–130.047%20 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0023%19 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.008%18 Jul →
mirage13–100.1218%18 Jul →
inferno10–130.0713%18 Jul →
mirage13–160.1012%18 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0317%17 Jul →
nuke10–130.0014%17 Jul →
mirage7–130.0717%16 Jul →
inferno13–40.0614%16 Jul →
cache16–140.0412%15 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0210%6 Jul →
anubis13–60.008%6 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.046%6 Jul →
overpass7–130.0115%5 Jul →
mirage6–130.0018%4 Jul →
mirage13–20.1120%3 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.057%3 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0713%29 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0619%29 Jun →
ancient13–70.0118%29 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0111%28 Jun →
mirage9–0-0.0133%28 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0318%28 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0314%28 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0110%28 Jun →
inferno13–90.0118%28 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0114%28 Jun →
mirage11–130.0018%28 Jun →
mirage15–150.029%10 Jun →
dust213–110.0622%10 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.019%10 Jun →
mirage8–130.0529%8 Jun →
anubis13–90.0814%8 Jun →
overpass13–110.0218%8 Jun →
nuke13–16-0.019%4 Jun →
overpass9–130.017%4 Jun →
nuke5–130.058%4 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.044%4 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0825%4 Jun →
ancient13–90.0010%4 Jun →
dust29–130.0314%3 Jun →
overpass9–130.0414%3 Jun →
mirage14–160.0712%3 Jun →
inferno16–120.0613%3 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0116%2 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0517%2 Jun →
ancient13–2-0.069%2 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.029%31 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.