Newbie1Kenobi

Newbie1Kenobi — CS2 Stats

SE76561197992631173[U:1:32365445]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,075Tracked matches45%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,798Hours in CS62Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating9,182Light Blue band · top ~58.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,182 -3,383 5 Sept – 14 Oct · 17 days played
8,77112,565peak 12,5655 Sept14 Oct
12,565Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,383 below peak (12,565)
  • -2,462 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 818 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches159——
Win rate40%——
K/D0.86——
Headshot %40%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,247), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate60.2%42.7%43.7%above
Shot accuracy0.3%11.3%12.0%11.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.160.991.02above
Match win rate35.1%43.9%44.7%9.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNewbie1KenobiFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER9,182 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning57
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–58–2Last 10040%Win rateWWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −127ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility6.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.7
Utility6.4
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time644ms+44ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 644ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 19 Sept →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 16 Sept →
461msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 2 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 13% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2010–1050%-0.01
ancientC166–1038%-0.01
nukeD152–1313%-0.04
anubisA149–564%-0.02
cacheB126–650%-0.03
dust2D113–827%-0.01
mirageD92–722%-0.05
vertigo—11–0100%0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.09
office—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

99,396Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
4,169Matches
35.1%Match win rate
60.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 4 players
0.3%Shot accuracy
5,609MVPs
1,388Hours (in match)
2,990Bombs planted
687Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,936
AWP1,684
FAMAS1,525
MP71,395
MP91,060

Lifetime map wins

4,858inferno
3,780dust2
3,224nuke
1,417vertigo
968train
93office
39italy
16ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

485Matches
50%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
70.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis11961%0.8812.6
Ancient9257%0.9514.0
Inferno5751%0.8312.8
Dust25240%0.7912.0
Nuke5046%0.8112.9
Mirage4628%0.6911.1
Vertigo2030%0.6610.5
Overpass1937%0.659.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
641msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
58.4%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
14.14HE damage / grenade
6.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.282% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8591% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0119%14 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.018%14 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0119%14 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0323%13 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0626%13 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0512%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0113%10 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0410%10 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0316%9 Oct →
mirage13–80.0116%9 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0513%9 Oct →
ancient13–00.0422%9 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0215%9 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0111%9 Oct →
anubis16–120.0814%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0111%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0413%9 Oct →
cache13–40.0413%8 Oct →
anubis13–40.0516%7 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0619%7 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0419%7 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.027%6 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0211%6 Oct →
nuke17–19-0.0316%6 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0214%5 Oct →
nuke9–130.0213%5 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0010%4 Oct →
cache13–6-0.019%3 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0417%3 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0511%3 Oct →
inferno13–50.064%3 Oct →
dust213–40.0216%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.1010%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0623%3 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0412%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.042%2 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0312%2 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.076%1 Oct →
ancient13–160.0422%1 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0415%1 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.125%1 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.028%28 Sept →
inferno13–20.0614%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.017%28 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0511%28 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0212%28 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.007%27 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0715%26 Sept →
anubis13–90.0026%26 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0612%25 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0114%25 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.019%25 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0313%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0711%24 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.069%24 Sept →
anubis13–80.0117%23 Sept →
inferno13–70.0221%23 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0613%23 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0221%23 Sept →
ancient13–00.1118%23 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0717%23 Sept →
dust23–130.0216%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0610%23 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.077%22 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.059%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0516%22 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0311%22 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0824%21 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0922%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0414%21 Sept →
cache13–60.0614%21 Sept →
inferno8–130.018%21 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.014%21 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0722%21 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0013%20 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0718%20 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0217%20 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.065%20 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.038%19 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0212%19 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0716%19 Sept →
ancient13–110.0623%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0226%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.1314%19 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.076%19 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0512%19 Sept →
cache13–70.0520%19 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.092%18 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0214%18 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.1715%18 Sept →
overpass9–6-0.098%18 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.090%17 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0016%17 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0917%17 Sept →
office11–13-0.086%17 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.059%17 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0714%17 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0317%17 Sept →
nuke13–80.0219%16 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0231%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.