sausol

sausol — CS2 Stats

PROsausoLGentle MatesSpainRiflerSettings & gear profile →

ES76561197991593267[U:1:31327539]Steam profile ↗

2,347Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,233 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsausolFACEITLevel 10 · 3,233 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning62
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateWLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.4
Aggression5.3
Utility6.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.2
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time489ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 489ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — mirage 13–6
130Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 19cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2112957%-0.02
nukeC2191243%0.01
infernoS1913668%0.00
mirageB1991047%0.02
overpassC83538%-0.00
anubisA74357%0.02
cacheD51420%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,209Matches
62%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
85.9ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient32862%1.2017.3
Mirage24555%1.2317.7
Anubis21761%1.2417.8
Nuke8971%1.3017.3
Dust27859%1.2016.7
Inferno6373%1.4115.3
Vertigo2770%1.4519.1
Overpass1753%1.1918.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$4,843Inventory value248ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Lore (Minimal Wear)$1,533★ M9 Bayonet | Crimson Web (Field-Tested)$708★ Sport Gloves | Vice (Field-Tested)$636M4A1-S | Printstream (Well-Worn)$270M4A1-S | Hyper Beast (Minimal Wear)$172AWP | Asiimov (Field-Tested)$170

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
42.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.6%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
476msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
62.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.47HE damage / grenade
12.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.477 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7838% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0636%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0734%9 Aug
ancient11–130.0235%9 Aug
inferno13–60.0726%8 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0124%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0422%8 Aug
ancient13–00.0322%7 Aug
inferno13–00.0519%7 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0021%7 Aug
inferno13–80.0023%7 Aug
mirage8–130.0018%7 Aug
cache11–130.0217%25 Jul
mirage7–130.0334%25 Jul
nuke13–70.0233%24 Jul
inferno13–30.0514%24 Jul
inferno11–130.0217%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0421%23 Jul
cache17–19-0.0421%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0127%21 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0526%21 Jul
cache13–40.0523%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0213%21 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1025%17 Jul
cache7–130.0017%17 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0415%16 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0525%16 Jul
nuke13–90.0823%15 Jul
inferno13–100.0121%15 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0311%27 Jun
anubis10–130.0132%27 Jun
mirage13–70.0719%25 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0020%20 Jun
ancient25–21-0.0427%20 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0529%20 Jun
ancient16–140.0114%18 Jun
nuke13–90.0840%18 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0215%16 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0230%16 Jun
mirage13–60.0932%15 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0410%15 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0516%15 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0215%31 May
inferno8–130.0024%31 May
inferno13–9-0.0418%30 May
mirage13–60.0133%30 May
nuke13–70.0726%30 May
nuke4–13-0.0315%30 May
ancient34–32-0.0225%30 May
mirage13–80.0327%30 May
anubis13–90.0118%29 May
anubis10–13-0.0122%28 May
ancient13–7-0.0039%28 May
ancient13–10-0.0615%27 May
mirage5–130.0130%13 May
inferno13–16-0.0121%13 May
nuke11–13-0.0420%12 May
overpass13–100.0412%12 May
inferno13–4-0.0038%11 May
mirage13–60.0634%11 May
overpass9–130.0331%10 May
nuke13–9-0.0112%10 May
ancient5–13-0.0212%9 May
nuke12–16-0.0337%9 May
mirage13–40.019%9 May
mirage16–19-0.0137%3 May
inferno19–22-0.0413%3 May
ancient13–11-0.0210%2 May
nuke13–80.0023%2 May
inferno13–20.0618%29 Apr
ancient16–130.0119%29 Apr
inferno19–170.017%26 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0324%26 Apr
mirage11–13-0.039%26 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0317%26 Apr
ancient13–60.0510%26 Apr
inferno13–110.0132%25 Apr
mirage13–70.0524%25 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0426%14 Apr
ancient13–40.0523%14 Apr
mirage9–130.0026%14 Apr
inferno13–80.0021%13 Apr
mirage8–10-0.0324%13 Apr
overpass3–13-0.0719%13 Apr
overpass9–130.0027%2 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0130%2 Apr
anubis13–90.0435%2 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0815%1 Apr
nuke13–70.0619%1 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0318%25 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0319%25 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0122%25 Mar
anubis13–60.046%25 Mar
nuke13–160.0415%25 Mar
nuke13–00.0821%22 Feb
mirage9–130.0215%22 Feb
overpass6–130.0325%22 Feb
mirage13–100.0519%22 Feb
overpass13–100.0215%22 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0226%22 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0026%21 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →