Ag1l

Ag1l — CS2 Stats

PRO“nemesis”100 ThievesPortugalRiflerSettings & gear profile →

RS76561198186878873[U:1:226613145]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,196Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating8.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,608Top 5% of 203,724 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8263 of 251075 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,663 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 26,608 → 26,608
0Faceit ELO · 3,663 → 3,663
+18Tracked matches · now 2,196
−3.3ppWin rate · 73.3% → 70.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,608 +0 7 Aug – 23 Sept · 16 days played
26,60826,608peak 26,6087 Aug23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 3,663 +0 28 Aug – 23 Sept · 15 observations
3,6633,663peak 3,66328 Aug23 Sept
26,608Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,663Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-05-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,663
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 337 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,608
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,392 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAg1lFACEITLevel 10 · 3,663 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,608 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,663csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning68
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY74–26Last 10074%Win rateWWLLLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility6.3
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time522ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 479ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms
Headshot accuracy26.3%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 10 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 10 Jul →
336msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 22 May →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

14Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 93% over 15anubisWeakest map · 60% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2317–674%0.01
mirageA1811–761%0.01
nukeS1714–382%0.03
infernoS1713–476%0.02
dust2S1514–193%0.01
anubisA53–260%0.04
cache—30–30%0.04
overpass—22–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (60% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,085Matches
59%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
87.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient26561%1.3718.2
Anubis21558%1.4117.9
Dust212063%1.5118.4
Vertigo8471%1.4718.6
Nuke7962%1.2917.1
Inferno6859%1.3316.0
Train1362%1.3817.5
Mirage1155%1.6718.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
89.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
519msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
6.13HE damage / grenade
14.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6449% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–70.0518%7 Oct →
mirage19–17-0.0224%7 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.1035%27 Sept →
ancient5–130.0840%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0418%27 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0323%27 Sept →
nuke13–110.0625%26 Sept →
inferno13–70.0322%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0425%26 Sept →
cache9–130.0114%26 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0517%26 Sept →
nuke13–80.0322%25 Sept →
anubis13–60.0620%25 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0119%24 Sept →
inferno13–70.0421%24 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0313%24 Sept →
ancient16–120.0225%24 Sept →
anubis13–40.0026%9 Sept →
ancient13–40.0530%28 Aug →
dust213–110.0428%25 Aug →
mirage13–100.1118%7 Aug →
mirage8–130.0726%11 Jul →
nuke13–50.1250%10 Jul →
ancient13–30.2443%10 Jul →
inferno13–40.1338%9 Jul →
dust213–30.1237%9 Jul →
cache7–130.0737%4 Jul →
anubis13–20.1833%4 Jul →
dust213–20.0728%29 Jun →
mirage13–70.1221%29 Jun →
dust213–70.0922%23 Jun →
inferno14–16-0.0232%21 Jun →
anubis13–16-0.0018%21 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0117%20 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0116%20 Jun →
ancient16–12-0.0421%18 Jun →
nuke5–130.0026%18 Jun →
dust213–100.0124%18 Jun →
ancient13–16-0.0520%16 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0411%16 Jun →
nuke16–12-0.0218%15 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0112%15 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0414%6 Jun →
mirage13–100.0112%6 Jun →
dust213–3-0.0116%6 Jun →
ancient13–90.0221%6 Jun →
dust213–60.0013%6 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0718%5 Jun →
ancient13–70.0028%5 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0226%4 Jun →
inferno13–110.0220%4 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0426%30 May →
ancient16–14-0.0215%30 May →
mirage4–13-0.0227%30 May →
dust213–100.0124%29 May →
ancient13–11-0.0216%29 May →
mirage9–13-0.0310%24 May →
ancient11–13-0.0518%24 May →
mirage9–13-0.0310%24 May →
ancient11–13-0.0518%24 May →
inferno13–60.0538%24 May →
ancient13–60.0614%24 May →
mirage13–00.0314%23 May →
nuke13–20.0520%23 May →
mirage13–00.0314%23 May →
inferno13–50.0418%23 May →
nuke13–20.0721%23 May →
inferno13–50.0418%23 May →
nuke13–20.0721%23 May →
inferno13–20.1425%22 May →
nuke13–70.0433%22 May →
ancient13–20.0423%22 May →
ancient13–50.0115%22 May →
nuke10–13-0.0215%19 May →
mirage17–19-0.0121%19 May →
ancient13–11-0.0527%19 May →
ancient13–60.0122%17 May →
nuke6–130.0225%13 May →
ancient17–19-0.0116%13 May →
overpass13–60.0023%11 May →
dust213–90.0222%11 May →
overpass13–60.0023%11 May →
dust213–90.0222%11 May →
mirage13–110.0122%11 May →
ancient13–9-0.0725%11 May →
inferno10–13-0.0626%11 May →
mirage13–110.0122%11 May →
nuke13–3-0.0227%10 May →
inferno13–20.0424%10 May →
inferno13–20.0424%10 May →
nuke13–3-0.0227%10 May →
ancient13–60.0129%10 May →
mirage13–7-0.0112%10 May →
ancient13–60.0129%10 May →
mirage13–7-0.0112%10 May →
inferno13–2-0.0024%9 May →
nuke13–100.0524%9 May →
inferno13–20.0334%9 May →
ancient13–10.1731%9 May →
nuke13–10.0530%9 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches14-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.