HeadShotMGO

HeadShotMGO — CS2 Stats

AU76561197990512973[U:1:30247245]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,662Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,345Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating11,994Blue band · top ~44.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,994 -868 20 Aug – 1 Nov · 30 days played
11,99414,747peak 14,74720 Aug1 Nov
14,747Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,753 below peak (14,747)
  • -2,325 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,006 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate46.7%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy13.9%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.300.980.99above
Match win rate43.4%43.3%43.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeadShotMGOFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,994 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning61
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–52–3Last 10045%Win rateLLWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 447ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 482ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.3
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.1
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time472ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 487ms → last ⅓ avg 472ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 20 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 30 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · inferno, 21 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 19mirageWeakest map · 29% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2210–1245%0.02
mirageD216–1529%-0.00
dust2A1912–763%0.03
cacheC146–843%0.01
anubisA106–460%-0.00
ancientC83–538%0.01
nukeD62–433%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 21). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

200,239Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
7,991Matches
43.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
46.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
19,516MVPs
3,730Hours (in match)
7,892Bombs planted
1,786Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,472
SG 55325,422
AWP24,015
AUG12,263
MAG-78,920
XM10146,543

Lifetime map wins

35,780dust2
13,111inferno
3,541train
3,012nuke
982office
865vertigo
743cbble
163ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
33%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
73.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient20%0.8015.5
Mirage10%0.8612.0
Nuke10%0.436.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
471msReaction time
56.3%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
12.83HE damage / grenade
6.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.8392% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0123%1 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.0014%1 Nov →
dust213–3-0.0322%1 Nov →
ancient13–16-0.0212%1 Nov →
cache10–130.098%31 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.058%30 Oct →
dust26–130.0314%30 Oct →
ancient13–50.0320%30 Oct →
mirage13–60.0112%18 Oct →
dust211–130.0328%14 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0310%14 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0310%14 Oct →
inferno13–30.0733%14 Oct →
cache4–13-0.1010%13 Oct →
dust212–160.0115%13 Oct →
dust213–100.0016%11 Oct →
mirage13–30.0233%11 Oct →
anubis9–130.0616%11 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0621%11 Oct →
cache13–60.057%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.0417%11 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0612%9 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0122%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0137%9 Oct →
anubis13–80.0017%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.089%4 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0820%4 Oct →
inferno13–110.0029%4 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0018%4 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0112%3 Oct →
inferno9–130.0329%3 Oct →
cache10–130.0115%2 Oct →
inferno13–110.0313%2 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0311%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0012%1 Oct →
anubis13–40.0629%28 Sept →
inferno15–150.0328%28 Sept →
ancient8–130.0317%28 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0119%27 Sept →
cache13–30.0317%26 Sept →
nuke13–70.1020%26 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0223%26 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.1138%26 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0421%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0418%24 Sept →
mirage11–130.0624%19 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0216%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0214%19 Sept →
inferno8–20.0423%12 Sept →
dust213–20.0313%12 Sept →
cache13–60.1232%12 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.025%12 Sept →
cache13–20.0512%12 Sept →
dust213–100.1024%6 Sept →
mirage13–110.0115%6 Sept →
anubis13–80.0220%6 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.079%6 Sept →
cache8–130.0825%5 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0512%5 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0312%5 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.023%5 Sept →
dust216–120.0329%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0411%4 Sept →
cache11–130.0032%4 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0618%4 Sept →
dust213–60.0222%4 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0213%31 Aug →
nuke15–150.0323%31 Aug →
inferno13–60.0825%31 Aug →
inferno9–130.1114%30 Aug →
dust213–80.0341%30 Aug →
cache13–100.0314%30 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.070%30 Aug →
dust216–130.0424%30 Aug →
cache2–9-0.148%30 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0316%29 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0016%29 Aug →
nuke13–50.0513%29 Aug →
inferno13–60.1227%28 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0513%28 Aug →
mirage9–130.0413%28 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0132%28 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0122%24 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0022%24 Aug →
dust213–00.078%24 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0421%24 Aug →
inferno13–80.0825%24 Aug →
dust213–50.0912%24 Aug →
mirage1–130.0411%23 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0121%23 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0210%22 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.018%22 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0723%22 Aug →
dust213–60.1021%21 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0434%21 Aug →
inferno13–60.0523%21 Aug →
cache13–70.0718%21 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.070%21 Aug →
mirage7–130.0520%21 Aug →
ancient13–80.1712%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.