❥Lissie

❥Lissie — CS2 Stats

CA76561197990471004[U:1:30205276]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,931Tracked matches26%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,934Top 25% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31033 of 242782 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,914 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 5 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,934 -3,650 5 Jul – 20 Sept · 30 days played
23,93427,584peak 27,5845 Jul20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,914 +0 28 Aug – 14 Sept · 3 observations
1,9141,914peak 1,91428 Aug14 Sept
27,584Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,914Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,914
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 87 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,650 below peak (27,584)
  • -1,218 over 30 days · declining
  • -3,650 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,066 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG❥LissieFACEITLevel 10 · 1,914 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,934 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,914csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning53
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35–59–6Last 10035%Win rateLLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility6.3
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time536ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy26.4%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 13 Aug →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 20 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 5 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 11 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 47% over 15mirageWeakest map · 23% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD225–1723%0.01
ancientD155–1033%0.01
anubisD155–1033%0.03
cacheB157–847%0.04
nukeB136–746%0.02
dust2D124–833%-0.02
inferno—32–167%0.04
vertigo—21–150%0.03
train—10–10%-0.01
italy—10–10%-0.00
shelter—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,220Matches
49%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
83.7ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage21547%1.1817.2
Anubis17657%1.3319.4
Ancient16753%1.3518.7
Nuke11149%1.2518.4
Inferno9544%1.1516.4
Dust29146%1.2417.8
Vertigo5959%1.3920.8
Overpass2148%1.3219.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.9%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
545msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.64HE damage / grenade
17.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2242% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0245%20 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0639%19 Sept →
ancient13–40.0135%19 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0829%16 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0021%16 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0220%15 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0127%13 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0124%12 Sept →
inferno4–130.0115%12 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0318%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.0321%12 Sept →
cache13–30.0624%12 Sept →
anubis6–130.0122%7 Sept →
cache13–110.0114%6 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0726%6 Sept →
mirage7–130.0539%5 Sept →
anubis9–130.0124%5 Sept →
anubis15–150.0538%5 Sept →
cache13–110.0427%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0327%1 Sept →
cache8–130.0333%1 Sept →
nuke13–100.0629%30 Aug →
cache15–150.0725%30 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.0520%30 Aug →
cache10–130.0127%30 Aug →
nuke13–20.0727%30 Aug →
train0–13-0.0118%30 Aug →
italy12–12-0.0028%30 Aug →
anubis5–130.0934%30 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0223%27 Aug →
vertigo13–8-0.0420%27 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0221%27 Aug →
mirage7–130.0529%25 Aug →
mirage4–130.0835%23 Aug →
nuke6–130.0143%23 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0236%22 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0126%22 Aug →
dust213–90.0121%22 Aug →
cache13–100.0118%22 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0330%22 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0021%22 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0317%19 Aug →
mirage13–110.1016%19 Aug →
anubis13–100.0819%19 Aug →
anubis6–130.1330%18 Aug →
vertigo12–120.0929%18 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0641%17 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0137%16 Aug →
dust213–30.0524%16 Aug →
ancient10–130.0626%13 Aug →
cache13–30.2231%13 Aug →
anubis13–70.0317%12 Aug →
cache8–130.0333%12 Aug →
mirage1–10-0.0324%12 Aug →
mirage22–200.0622%9 Aug →
ancient7–130.0522%9 Aug →
dust210–130.0222%8 Aug →
anubis7–130.0118%8 Aug →
ancient17–190.0522%8 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0123%6 Aug →
ancient8–130.0221%6 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0527%6 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0022%1 Aug →
cache9–130.0028%29 Jul →
mirage13–50.0823%27 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0123%27 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0126%26 Jul →
ancient9–130.0518%26 Jul →
ancient13–80.0122%26 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0137%26 Jul →
nuke13–50.0426%26 Jul →
mirage10–130.0124%25 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0019%19 Jul →
anubis13–100.0218%18 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0234%16 Jul →
inferno16–14-0.0121%13 Jul →
mirage13–30.0439%13 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0211%12 Jul →
nuke13–60.0331%12 Jul →
cache13–50.0832%12 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0223%12 Jul →
dust213–60.0323%12 Jul →
nuke2–130.0126%12 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0519%12 Jul →
inferno13–40.1330%12 Jul →
mirage13–70.1027%12 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0222%12 Jul →
nuke13–10.0923%11 Jul →
cache8–130.0324%11 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0026%11 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0031%11 Jul →
anubis13–90.0629%11 Jul →
shelter7–13-0.0133%11 Jul →
mirage15–150.0126%10 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0922%10 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0326%10 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0119%10 Jul →
ancient16–120.0533%9 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0623%5 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0323%5 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →