emeser-

emeser- — CS2 Stats

PL76561197989198140[U:1:28932412]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,583Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,241Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,144 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,144 → 2,144
+20Tracked matches · now 3,583
0.0ppWin rate · 63.3% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,144 +0 2 Sept8 Sept · 2 observations
2,1442,144peak 2,1442 Sept8 Sept
2,144Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,144
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 356 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2314+9
Win rate70%43%+27pp
K/D1.020.97+0.05
Headshot %37%47%−9pp

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate36.6%48.3%51.0%14.3% short
Shot accuracy22.0%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.171.071.09above
Match win rate47.3%46.9%48.4%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGemeser-FACEITLevel 9 · 2,144 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,144csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning53
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4951Last 10049%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.1
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time575ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · vertigo, 10 Aug
41%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 27 Jul
367msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · ancient, 21 Aug
13–2Biggest win · vertigo, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 18cacheWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA1810856%0.02
ancientC1771041%0.01
anubisB179853%0.00
cacheC135838%0.02
mirageB105550%0.03
vertigoB84450%0.04
dust2C73443%0.06
infernoC52340%-0.00
office440100%0.06
train1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

414,246Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
9,715Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
36.6%Headshot %
22.0%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 9 players
37,736MVPs
7,241Hours (in match)
12,707Bombs planted
3,574Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP136,093
AK-4771,991
Glock-1811,330
Knife9,665
P2507,468
SG 5536,524
MAC-105,435

Lifetime map wins

22,932dust2
13,988nuke
13,116train
12,714inferno
5,184cbble
4,764vertigo
1,586aztec
767office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,156Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
88.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis28747%1.1018.0
Ancient26149%1.1517.9
Nuke24852%1.1718.0
Mirage21752%1.1217.5
Dust214542%1.0918.0
Vertigo10950%1.0716.8
Inferno10040%1.0418.0
Overpass8056%1.2218.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.3%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
586msReaction time
34.8%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
15.38HE damage / grenade
7.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8373% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0217%12 Sept
dust211–130.0217%11 Sept
cache13–60.0222%11 Sept
office13–50.0518%11 Sept
office13–30.1940%7 Sept
mirage19–17-0.0311%5 Sept
nuke13–60.0615%5 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0611%2 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0415%2 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0623%1 Sept
dust213–90.0419%1 Sept
nuke13–70.1724%30 Aug
nuke9–130.0720%30 Aug
nuke13–90.0330%29 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0615%29 Aug
inferno13–90.0220%28 Aug
ancient9–130.0728%26 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0111%21 Aug
cache13–50.0825%21 Aug
anubis13–110.0017%21 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0220%21 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0613%21 Aug
dust213–110.1025%21 Aug
ancient13–70.1119%21 Aug
ancient13–30.0210%21 Aug
nuke13–40.0314%21 Aug
mirage13–40.1116%21 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0016%20 Aug
mirage6–130.1021%20 Aug
dust213–60.0823%20 Aug
dust25–130.1622%20 Aug
ancient28–260.0414%19 Aug
vertigo2–13-0.0227%19 Aug
office13–60.0226%19 Aug
cache9–13-0.0120%18 Aug
vertigo11–130.0119%18 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0424%18 Aug
cache7–13-0.0323%17 Aug
mirage9–130.0421%16 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0123%16 Aug
anubis22–190.0117%14 Aug
nuke4–130.0229%14 Aug
anubis7–130.1123%14 Aug
nuke11–130.0717%14 Aug
anubis19–170.017%13 Aug
cache13–50.0825%13 Aug
cache13–60.0710%13 Aug
anubis4–130.0321%13 Aug
cache13–7-0.0210%13 Aug
mirage13–80.0716%13 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0217%13 Aug
dust211–130.0310%13 Aug
cache11–130.0320%12 Aug
train11–130.0518%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0216%10 Aug
office13–80.0122%10 Aug
vertigo2–10-0.0213%10 Aug
vertigo13–30.1924%10 Aug
cache8–13-0.0631%8 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0117%8 Aug
ancient10–130.0113%7 Aug
ancient9–130.0222%7 Aug
ancient13–60.0013%6 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0019%6 Aug
anubis8–130.0921%6 Aug
vertigo13–110.0218%5 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0116%5 Aug
ancient5–130.0913%5 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0018%5 Aug
mirage6–130.0123%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.058%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.049%4 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0619%3 Aug
cache5–13-0.0428%1 Aug
nuke13–80.0321%1 Aug
nuke13–70.049%1 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0920%31 Jul
ancient16–19-0.0423%31 Jul
nuke13–100.0421%31 Jul
anubis16–12-0.0824%31 Jul
dust26–130.0224%31 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0635%30 Jul
cache15–190.0322%30 Jul
inferno10–130.0223%29 Jul
vertigo13–20.0615%29 Jul
vertigo13–60.1417%29 Jul
anubis13–40.1433%28 Jul
cache8–130.1430%28 Jul
cache4–13-0.0241%27 Jul
nuke13–90.0613%27 Jul
ancient14–160.0337%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0525%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0738%26 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0136%26 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0420%25 Jul
anubis4–130.0227%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0426%23 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0624%23 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0325%23 Jul
mirage13–90.0631%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →