Hopis #범고래 iT G Ma

Hopis #범고래 iT G Ma — CS2 Stats

BR76561197988288223[U:1:28022495]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

513Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.3 LearningSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,928 +4,246 14 Mar – 26 Apr · 18 days played
9,57014,405peak 14,40514 Mar26 Apr
14,462Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,365Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
59Days played since 2026-01-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,365
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 166 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHopis #범고래 iT G MaPEAK ELO1,365csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning49
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLLLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −14ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim3.6
Utility5.0
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch0.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning4.9
Utility5.0
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.3/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time561ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 5 Apr →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 5 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · dust2, 4 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 19 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB3114–1745%-0.01
infernoB168–850%-0.02
anubisB147–750%-0.03
dust2B105–550%-0.02
nukeS107–370%-0.01
mirageD93–633%-0.02
cacheA53–260%-0.03
overpass—33–0100%-0.02
office—10–10%-0.03
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

125Matches
52%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
67.8ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2759%0.9213.7
Inferno1856%1.0415.0
Dust21533%0.7613.3
Mirage1145%0.7915.2
Train875%0.9612.8
Anubis850%0.7612.9
Cache425%0.366.3
Overpass333%0.5811.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.6%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.2%Spray accuracy
59.8%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
551msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
46.1%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
7.72HE damage / grenade
5.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.621% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6461% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.049%4 Oct →
dust213–16-0.055%4 Oct →
cache3–13-0.066%9 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.1110%9 Sept →
dust213–90.0224%6 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0411%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0830%5 Sept →
ancient14–160.0113%5 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0112%5 Sept →
inferno7–130.0323%31 Aug →
nuke13–60.0017%24 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0510%23 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0514%19 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0415%19 Aug →
ancient4–130.018%14 Aug →
cache16–120.038%14 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.058%1 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0421%31 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0119%30 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0422%29 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.079%26 Jul →
ancient13–110.0911%26 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.056%26 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0312%26 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.0113%19 Jul →
office11–13-0.0320%8 Jul →
mirage13–90.0214%8 Jul →
ancient13–2-0.0513%3 May →
mirage11–13-0.0112%3 May →
mirage13–10-0.0614%30 Apr →
ancient13–100.0717%30 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.035%30 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0313%30 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0311%29 Apr →
mirage19–16-0.0611%26 Apr →
anubis22–19-0.0316%26 Apr →
ancient4–13-0.0110%26 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0811%24 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.036%24 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0812%22 Apr →
ancient15–150.0118%22 Apr →
inferno16–14-0.013%21 Apr →
overpass13–10-0.0611%19 Apr →
ancient19–15-0.018%19 Apr →
overpass13–110.0214%18 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0514%18 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0315%17 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0415%15 Apr →
dust28–130.0015%15 Apr →
ancient14–16-0.0619%13 Apr →
inferno13–8-0.006%12 Apr →
inferno13–60.0713%11 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0517%10 Apr →
overpass13–8-0.029%10 Apr →
inferno13–100.0014%9 Apr →
ancient13–50.1010%5 Apr →
inferno13–50.0121%5 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.0014%5 Apr →
anubis15–15-0.0113%4 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0125%1 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0018%1 Apr →
dust213–70.009%29 Mar →
nuke6–130.0111%29 Mar →
anubis13–60.0614%23 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.085%22 Mar →
anubis16–14-0.0411%19 Mar →
dust213–8-0.0320%19 Mar →
anubis13–60.0116%18 Mar →
anubis8–130.0115%16 Mar →
vertigo12–120.0111%15 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.0410%14 Mar →
ancient16–190.0013%8 Mar →
ancient13–3-0.0212%8 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0524%7 Mar →
ancient15–150.0315%7 Mar →
ancient13–100.0312%26 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0612%26 Feb →
dust213–40.027%25 Feb →
ancient13–30.069%25 Feb →
ancient13–80.0710%22 Feb →
nuke13–60.0414%22 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0115%22 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.0517%20 Feb →
anubis16–12-0.0316%19 Feb →
ancient16–14-0.032%19 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.013%19 Feb →
anubis15–15-0.0312%14 Feb →
ancient4–13-0.0516%14 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.054%11 Feb →
nuke13–100.0621%10 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0727%8 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0412%8 Feb →
mirage1–70.005%8 Feb →
anubis9–13-0.0911%7 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.049%6 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0513%31 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0222%31 Jan →
mirage6–130.0816%31 Jan →
inferno3–13-0.073%29 Jan →
dust28–13-0.1018%24 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.