Moukli

Moukli — CS2 Stats

76561197987957025[U:1:27691297]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,671Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#83484 of 260020 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,453 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +1,505 2 Aug – 28 Oct · 26 days played
18,49520,547peak 20,5472 Aug28 Oct
20,930Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,453Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,453
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 78 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 547 below peak (20,547)
  • -353 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,505 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMoukliFACEITLevel 7 · 1,453 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,453csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning48
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–45–1Last 10054%Win rateLWLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility7.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.8
Utility7.3
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time561ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 3 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · nuke, 1 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 29 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 16mirageWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2115–671%0.01
anubisC198–1142%-0.01
cacheA1810–856%-0.01
nukeS1613–381%0.02
mirageC145–936%-0.03
dust2C83–538%-0.01
ancient—40–40%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

352Matches
53%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
74.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6555%1.0414.6
Nuke5964%1.2015.8
Mirage5244%0.8112.3
Anubis4858%0.9613.8
Ancient3330%0.8012.6
Overpass1953%0.9713.6
Dust21724%1.0514.8
Cache771%1.1312.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
573msReaction time
29.6%T opening success
57.0%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
11.7%Flash assists
11.27HE damage / grenade
15.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6108% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0520%3 Nov →
cache13–70.0315%28 Oct →
dust21–10.000%28 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.077%19 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0127%19 Oct →
cache13–00.0121%18 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0115%18 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0221%1 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0624%1 Oct →
dust213–110.0616%1 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0232%1 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0414%1 Oct →
nuke13–90.0314%1 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0520%1 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0719%29 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0113%29 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0223%29 Sept →
nuke13–30.0915%29 Sept →
inferno13–00.0614%28 Sept →
dust27–13-0.098%28 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0420%28 Sept →
nuke13–90.0718%25 Sept →
mirage13–60.0516%24 Sept →
dust213–70.0720%24 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0123%24 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0114%24 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0413%24 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0314%24 Sept →
dust210–130.0023%24 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0919%23 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0131%23 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0217%23 Sept →
cache13–100.0217%21 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0312%21 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0017%21 Sept →
nuke13–80.0718%21 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0621%20 Sept →
anubis13–80.0218%20 Sept →
inferno13–90.0416%20 Sept →
inferno13–70.0113%17 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0216%17 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0621%14 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0220%14 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0114%14 Sept →
cache13–40.0513%9 Sept →
inferno16–140.0125%9 Sept →
cache13–90.0122%9 Sept →
nuke13–70.0016%8 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0523%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0418%8 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0615%8 Sept →
cache5–130.0326%5 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0121%5 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0614%5 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0421%5 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0427%5 Sept →
anubis13–50.0416%5 Sept →
nuke13–90.0517%5 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0427%3 Sept →
mirage13–40.1410%3 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0618%3 Sept →
inferno13–90.0218%3 Sept →
anubis13–90.0410%1 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0321%1 Sept →
inferno13–20.0518%1 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0217%1 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0336%1 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0111%31 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0824%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0214%31 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0521%30 Aug →
anubis13–100.0125%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.0631%30 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0918%30 Aug →
anubis10–130.0323%30 Aug →
mirage16–130.0218%26 Aug →
anubis13–100.0330%26 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0123%26 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0717%26 Aug →
cache13–110.0425%26 Aug →
nuke10–10.020%26 Aug →
inferno13–20.0214%25 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0219%25 Aug →
inferno11–130.0221%25 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0712%18 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0519%18 Aug →
nuke13–20.0218%18 Aug →
anubis13–110.0214%18 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0016%18 Aug →
cache16–140.0123%18 Aug →
inferno13–110.0714%18 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0111%11 Aug →
nuke13–80.0323%11 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.1016%11 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0113%11 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0419%9 Aug →
nuke12–160.0319%9 Aug →
anubis13–20.057%9 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0322%9 Aug →
nuke13–50.0114%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.