Avon

Avon — CS2 Stats

FI76561197987334848[U:1:27069120]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,242Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating21,441Top 50% of 213,542 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64467 of 260202 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,575 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,441 -3,950 29 Apr – 30 Oct · 16 days played
21,44126,600peak 26,60029 Apr30 Oct
26,600Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,575Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-04-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,575
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 176 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,159 below peak (26,600)
  • -230 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,559 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAvonFACEITLevel 8 · 1,575 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,441 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,575csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateLWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.7pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time629ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 6 Jul →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 3 Nov →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · cache, 24 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 24 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2411–1346%-0.00
dust2C207–1335%-0.01
ancientC188–1044%-0.01
infernoC125–742%0.02
nukeC125–742%-0.00
cacheS118–373%-0.00
anubis—21–150%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

642Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
69.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13450%0.9913.5
Ancient9959%1.0313.8
Nuke8951%0.9713.8
Inferno6048%1.0315.2
Dust25937%0.8813.2
Anubis3847%0.8212.2
Train1233%0.8013.9
Overpass967%0.9212.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
625msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
38.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
11.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7936% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0813%4 Nov →
cache13–80.0242%3 Nov →
inferno13–40.0213%31 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0510%30 Oct →
cache13–6-0.033%30 Oct →
inferno4–130.0319%28 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0819%18 Oct →
cache13–70.0015%13 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0718%13 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0217%13 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0612%30 Sept →
dust29–130.0218%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0321%29 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0318%26 Sept →
dust213–30.0311%22 Sept →
nuke1–130.0235%2 Sept →
ancient13–90.0118%2 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0327%2 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0226%2 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0039%2 Sept →
dust211–130.0425%2 Sept →
nuke15–150.0525%29 Jul →
ancient5–130.0223%29 Jul →
mirage11–130.0735%29 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0523%28 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0936%28 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0420%28 Jul →
ancient13–100.0420%28 Jul →
dust213–90.0429%28 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0316%27 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0019%27 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0628%25 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0424%25 Jul →
inferno10–130.0521%25 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0427%25 Jul →
mirage8–130.0332%25 Jul →
cache13–30.0518%24 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0222%24 Jul →
ancient13–30.0627%24 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0018%24 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0910%21 Jul →
ancient13–100.0017%21 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0125%18 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0020%18 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0629%10 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0710%9 Jul →
mirage13–50.0528%9 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0124%9 Jul →
cache13–100.0423%9 Jul →
nuke13–30.0023%9 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0429%9 Jul →
mirage13–70.0129%9 Jul →
cache13–70.0835%7 Jul →
dust29–130.1329%6 Jul →
inferno13–70.1825%6 Jul →
mirage2–130.0237%1 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0127%1 Jul →
dust29–130.029%1 Jul →
dust216–140.0121%25 Jun →
mirage13–90.0530%25 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0330%25 Jun →
dust20–13-0.075%25 Jun →
inferno13–60.0523%24 Jun →
ancient8–130.0216%24 Jun →
dust213–40.0410%24 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0226%24 Jun →
dust211–130.0018%24 Jun →
anubis16–13-0.0315%22 Jun →
nuke13–40.0516%22 Jun →
inferno13–90.0425%22 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0322%22 Jun →
ancient13–70.0718%22 Jun →
inferno13–90.1129%18 Jun →
mirage7–130.0110%18 Jun →
mirage13–90.0415%16 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0713%16 Jun →
nuke13–90.0128%16 Jun →
inferno6–130.0126%24 May →
ancient0–13-0.1240%24 May →
nuke13–2-0.0218%24 May →
mirage13–11-0.039%24 May →
inferno7–13-0.0618%20 May →
ancient5–13-0.1011%20 May →
mirage13–11-0.0516%20 May →
dust29–13-0.0422%20 May →
ancient6–13-0.0513%20 May →
nuke9–13-0.0313%11 May →
ancient13–160.0017%11 May →
dust213–3-0.0319%11 May →
mirage3–13-0.0325%11 May →
ancient10–13-0.0226%6 May →
dust213–11-0.0320%6 May →
mirage13–9-0.0124%6 May →
overpass16–14-0.0013%6 May →
ancient10–13-0.0120%6 May →
dust20–13-0.090%6 May →
inferno10–13-0.0018%29 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0319%29 Apr →
mirage13–70.0516%29 Apr →
nuke13–30.0834%29 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.