GIGAMANTIS

GIGAMANTIS — CS2 Stats

76561197985316829[U:1:25051101]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,056Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,311Top 50% of 213,542 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52632 of 260202 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,899 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,311 +415 17 Jun – 29 Oct · 19 days played
21,52724,717peak 24,71717 Jun29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,899 +0 3 Sept – 14 Sept · 2 observations
1,8991,899peak 1,8993 Sept14 Sept
24,717Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,899Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-06-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,899
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,406 below peak (24,717)
  • -862 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,689 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGIGAMANTISFACEITLevel 8 · 1,899 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,311 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,899csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.4

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time584ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 10–2 · mirage, 25 Jun →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · cache, 2 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · nuke, 23 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 8 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2510–1540%-0.01
dust2B2412–1250%-0.01
nukeC167–944%-0.01
ancientA116–555%-0.00
cacheS96–367%-0.00
infernoS75–271%0.03
anubisD62–433%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

822Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
71.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211848%0.9413.2
Nuke10959%0.9714.9
Mirage6433%0.8513.8
Inferno6452%0.9113.5
Ancient4544%0.9514.7
Overpass3352%1.0014.4
Train3060%1.0215.4
Anubis1250%0.9413.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
577msReaction time
42.1%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
7.61HE damage / grenade
4.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0628%4 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0119%3 Nov →
mirage19–16-0.0324%2 Nov →
nuke13–7-0.058%2 Nov →
mirage2–130.0016%29 Oct →
cache12–160.0432%29 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.008%29 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0520%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0523%20 Oct →
ancient18–220.0015%20 Oct →
anubis13–60.0823%20 Oct →
nuke16–130.0115%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.1014%15 Oct →
cache13–70.1020%13 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0321%13 Oct →
mirage13–160.0115%13 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0718%13 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0117%8 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.1018%6 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0112%6 Oct →
nuke14–160.0214%2 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0714%23 Sept →
dust213–30.0317%22 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0231%17 Sept →
ancient13–40.0627%2 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0427%2 Sept →
mirage1–60.0333%3 Aug →
cache13–80.0744%2 Aug →
dust213–70.0526%2 Aug →
nuke13–60.0221%2 Aug →
dust216–120.0930%2 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0317%2 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0318%29 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.077%29 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0116%29 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0213%28 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0520%28 Jul →
dust213–30.0616%27 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0514%27 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0516%27 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0320%25 Jul →
cache16–12-0.0312%25 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0310%25 Jul →
mirage13–50.0326%25 Jul →
ancient13–100.0314%25 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.1226%23 Jul →
dust20–4-0.0143%23 Jul →
nuke13–60.0325%23 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0530%16 Jul →
cache7–13-0.058%16 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0123%16 Jul →
ancient12–16-0.0120%16 Jul →
mirage4–130.029%16 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0219%10 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0432%10 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0620%9 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0135%9 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0115%9 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0027%9 Jul →
inferno13–50.0818%9 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0015%9 Jul →
ancient13–80.0012%9 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0511%9 Jul →
nuke13–30.0223%9 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0536%9 Jul →
mirage13–70.0418%9 Jul →
dust213–30.0128%9 Jul →
mirage16–130.0028%8 Jul →
inferno13–10.0425%8 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0129%8 Jul →
ancient13–110.0121%2 Jul →
mirage11–130.0129%2 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0425%1 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0612%1 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0220%1 Jul →
overpass6–13-0.0719%27 Jun →
mirage13–80.0519%27 Jun →
inferno13–90.0225%27 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0611%27 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0331%27 Jun →
dust213–3-0.0321%27 Jun →
dust216–13-0.0415%25 Jun →
mirage10–20.1430%25 Jun →
anubis4–13-0.1013%25 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0224%25 Jun →
inferno10–130.0620%25 Jun →
dust210–130.0230%25 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0411%25 Jun →
inferno13–60.0713%24 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0314%24 Jun →
dust213–40.0618%24 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.047%24 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0832%24 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0117%24 Jun →
anubis16–130.0524%22 Jun →
nuke13–40.1027%22 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0223%22 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0216%22 Jun →
ancient13–70.0129%22 Jun →
dust213–110.0210%17 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.