zinnia1

zinnia1 — CS2 Stats

76561197985903339[U:1:25637611]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

960Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,451Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#5759 of 247923 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,738 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,024 +3,880 11 Jan – 4 Jun · 19 days played
22,80727,024peak 27,02411 Jan4 Jun
27,024Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,738Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2025-11-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,738
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 13 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate37.8%48.2%50.9%13.1% short
Shot accuracy16.8%13.3%13.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.071.09above
Match win rate52.4%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzinnia1FACEITLevel 9 · 1,738 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,738csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning57
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–35–3Last 10062%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.7
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time519ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · overpass, 7 Apr →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 31 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · dust2, 31 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
17–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10ancientWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3117–1455%0.00
ancientC146–843%0.01
nukeS129–375%0.02
infernoA127–558%0.03
cacheS108–280%0.02
overpassA95–456%0.01
anubisS54–180%0.02
dust2—43–175%0.08
train—33–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

158,483Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
5,209Matches
52.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
37.8%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
9,444MVPs
1,988Hours (in match)
9,127Bombs planted
1,190Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,545
Tec-914,452
Glock-1811,780
AWP10,297
P2508,767

Lifetime map wins

5,361inferno
3,203nuke
2,776dust2
1,246train
835cbble
194office
174vertigo
132aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

257Matches
60%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
81.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3954%1.1716.1
Ancient2040%1.0216.0
Nuke1883%1.2816.8
Inferno1457%1.3517.6
Overpass1346%1.1617.5
Anubis1060%1.5414.3
Dust2757%1.2817.0
Cache560%1.1216.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
521msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
7.00HE damage / grenade
8.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3593 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4111% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0619%30 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0617%30 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0120%29 Sept →
inferno13–50.1416%29 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0413%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0623%18 Sept →
ancient13–70.0021%18 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0423%18 Sept →
dust213–00.1457%31 Aug →
inferno11–130.0021%31 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0025%22 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0529%15 Aug →
dust213–40.0823%15 Aug →
anubis13–40.0423%2 Aug →
mirage13–110.0125%14 Jul →
cache2–00.000%14 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0118%25 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0617%7 Jun →
inferno13–50.0419%7 Jun →
mirage13–110.0010%4 Jun →
nuke13–100.0229%3 Jun →
cache16–14-0.047%20 May →
mirage16–14-0.029%19 May →
mirage11–130.0412%19 May →
anubis13–10-0.049%19 May →
mirage13–50.0011%17 May →
nuke13–50.0713%17 May →
ancient15–150.0015%14 May →
mirage13–110.0614%13 May →
cache13–20.1027%13 May →
nuke13–30.0626%13 May →
mirage1–13-0.086%13 May →
cache13–100.0727%12 May →
cache13–80.1035%11 May →
cache13–70.0623%11 May →
cache2–13-0.0721%11 May →
inferno9–130.0013%10 May →
ancient13–40.0812%10 May →
cache13–110.0418%30 Apr →
ancient7–130.0122%28 Apr →
mirage11–130.0213%28 Apr →
overpass13–60.0223%27 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0018%26 Apr →
nuke13–90.069%24 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0617%24 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0416%23 Apr →
mirage13–80.0327%22 Apr →
mirage13–10.0623%21 Apr →
inferno13–110.0222%21 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.059%20 Apr →
ancient13–10-0.0118%16 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0426%16 Apr →
mirage13–80.0823%8 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0018%8 Apr →
overpass13–30.1820%7 Apr →
mirage4–130.0719%7 Apr →
inferno8–80.0622%5 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0213%2 Apr →
inferno11–130.0233%1 Apr →
overpass9–70.0123%30 Mar →
mirage13–50.0821%28 Mar →
overpass13–20.0014%6 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0221%5 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.0120%3 Mar →
inferno13–6-0.0215%16 Feb →
inferno13–100.0625%16 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0630%8 Feb →
inferno16–140.0317%8 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0617%8 Feb →
ancient13–80.0923%8 Feb →
nuke13–30.0719%8 Feb →
ancient15–150.0625%7 Feb →
inferno16–140.0117%7 Feb →
mirage8–130.0413%6 Feb →
nuke13–110.0714%4 Feb →
mirage13–80.0318%3 Feb →
mirage13–90.0328%3 Feb →
overpass8–130.0011%3 Feb →
mirage13–16-0.0210%1 Feb →
overpass13–60.0116%1 Feb →
dust28–40.1326%1 Feb →
mirage7–130.0216%1 Feb →
anubis13–90.0423%29 Jan →
nuke13–40.0333%29 Jan →
nuke11–13-0.0626%23 Jan →
ancient13–40.1018%23 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0221%23 Jan →
nuke13–20.0618%23 Jan →
anubis13–30.0916%23 Jan →
inferno7–13-0.0726%16 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0328%16 Jan →
ancient11–130.0217%15 Jan →
train13–70.0526%11 Jan →
mirage13–110.0219%11 Jan →
overpass9–13-0.0015%11 Jan →
mirage3–13-0.0427%11 Jan →
train13–70.0850%4 Jan →
train13–110.0129%14 Nov →
overpass2–13-0.0713%14 Nov →
ancient6–13-0.0413%13 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.