dare

dare — CS2 Stats

US76561197985493153[U:1:25227425]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

952Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,270Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#4088 of 253966 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,466 +3,112 3 Mar – 6 Jul · 17 days played
24,35427,466peak 27,4663 Mar6 Jul
27,466Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2026-03-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,061), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate62.4%50.9%
Shot accuracy10.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.641.09
Match win rate116.8%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdareFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning50
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–40–4Last 10056%Win rateLWLWLLWTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch5.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.0
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time519ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · stronghold, 8 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–10 · inferno, 11 Apr →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 13 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 9 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2111–1052%0.02
cacheC188–1044%0.01
infernoA1810–856%0.02
ancientS128–467%0.02
mirageA117–464%0.01
nukeD93–633%0.03
anubis—43–175%0.04
overpass—33–0100%0.03
stronghold—11–0100%0.16
vertigo—11–0100%0.06
warden—10–10%-0.02
office—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,325Lifetime kills
1.64K/D · Top 5% of Level 10 players
1,657Matches
116.8%Match win rate · Top 1% of Level 10 players
62.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
10.8%Shot accuracy
5,386MVPs
1,189Hours (in match)
3,194Bombs planted
1,928Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,002
Tec-92,177
AWP2,105
FAMAS2,069
UMP-451,956
SG 5531,853

Lifetime map wins

11,880inferno
9,438dust2
5,387nuke
3,595train
2,630cbble
1,257vertigo
109office
79lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

325Matches
62%Win rate
1.55Avg K/D
85.1ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23866%1.2916.3
Inferno3661%1.2618.2
Nuke2471%1.4517.3
Cache1567%1.4019.6
Mirage1258%1.2421.1
Ancient1164%1.1015.4
Anubis933%1.0116.3
Overpass540%1.0414.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
530msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
11.34HE damage / grenade
12.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2326% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0624%8 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0016%2 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0916%2 Sept →
nuke13–80.0619%2 Sept →
dust211–130.0120%28 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0219%26 Aug →
inferno13–110.0333%13 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0611%9 Aug →
ancient13–0-0.017%9 Aug →
anubis13–40.068%9 Aug →
cache14–160.0021%9 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0516%7 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0226%5 Aug →
dust213–20.0716%3 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0224%3 Aug →
mirage10–130.0324%31 Jul →
inferno13–100.0021%24 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0528%20 Jul →
cache13–110.0222%15 Jul →
nuke13–160.0420%13 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0226%13 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0112%10 Jul →
cache13–5-0.0113%10 Jul →
dust222–20-0.0123%10 Jul →
ancient13–80.0319%10 Jul →
inferno13–110.0411%6 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0626%6 Jul →
ancient13–60.0124%6 Jul →
nuke13–70.0640%6 Jul →
nuke13–90.1127%3 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0331%3 Jul →
overpass13–50.0321%3 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0219%2 Jul →
mirage13–00.0627%2 Jul →
dust29–130.0119%2 Jul →
ancient13–40.1121%2 Jul →
mirage13–30.1028%1 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0427%1 Jul →
inferno10–60.0923%23 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.0319%23 Jun →
dust213–100.0933%23 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0721%5 Jun →
nuke8–130.0723%3 Jun →
inferno11–130.0624%3 Jun →
dust213–40.0517%22 May →
inferno13–70.1620%22 May →
cache12–12-0.0619%22 May →
inferno16–120.0413%22 May →
cache6–130.0227%20 May →
dust26–130.0341%19 May →
inferno16–130.0317%19 May →
cache12–120.0118%19 May →
inferno11–30.0114%18 May →
ancient13–10-0.0014%18 May →
cache13–80.0325%14 May →
cache13–70.0815%14 May →
cache13–7-0.0023%13 May →
cache7–130.0123%13 May →
stronghold13–80.1625%8 May →
vertigo13–100.0610%8 May →
cache13–100.0316%8 May →
cache12–120.1218%8 May →
mirage6–13-0.0126%4 May →
cache13–50.0823%4 May →
cache11–130.0412%4 May →
cache13–110.0316%4 May →
cache3–130.0014%4 May →
dust25–13-0.0312%29 Apr →
dust213–40.1330%17 Apr →
inferno4–130.0117%17 Apr →
overpass13–100.0913%15 Apr →
mirage13–90.0421%12 Apr →
inferno5–10-0.0350%11 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0028%10 Apr →
warden7–13-0.0219%10 Apr →
inferno13–00.1022%8 Apr →
ancient13–40.0116%7 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0720%7 Apr →
nuke10–130.0113%7 Apr →
mirage13–8-0.0320%6 Apr →
dust21–100.0431%6 Apr →
nuke11–130.0212%6 Apr →
ancient4–130.0018%6 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0915%6 Apr →
office13–110.1118%3 Apr →
ancient7–130.0723%3 Apr →
dust213–110.0115%2 Apr →
ancient13–90.059%1 Apr →
anubis13–50.1316%27 Mar →
dust213–30.0029%27 Mar →
dust213–90.0918%27 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0118%27 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0218%10 Mar →
anubis16–140.0422%10 Mar →
dust216–13-0.0119%9 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0315%9 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0123%6 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0133%4 Mar →
inferno9–130.0122%3 Mar →
dust211–130.0722%3 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.