Viras

Viras — CS2 Stats

DK76561197983965767[U:1:23700039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,089Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidOpening Duellist
Premier CS Rating22,643Top 25% of 212,379 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#47849 of 259354 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,183 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,643 +2,049 4 May – 15 Oct · 32 days played
18,94227,523peak 27,5234 May15 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,183 +0 2 Sept – 11 Sept · 3 observations
2,1832,183peak 2,1832 Sept11 Sept
27,523Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,183Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-05-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,183
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 317 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,880 below peak (27,523)
  • +265 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,701 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,357 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVirasFACEITLevel 8 · 2,183 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,643 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,183csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning75
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateTLLWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+2.6 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim7.4
Utility4.2
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels9.4
Clutch6.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 77% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 77% on CT to 55% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning7.5
Utility4.2
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels8.2
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time561ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.43Best match rating · 9–0 · vertigo, 28 Jun →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · anubis, 1 Jun →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 1 Jun →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 13 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
16–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 79% over 19mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2619–773%0.04
nukeS1915–479%0.05
ancientD134–931%0.01
mirageD113–827%0.04
dust2B84–450%0.02
cacheS86–275%0.04
anubisA74–357%0.02
overpassD62–433%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.43
poseidon—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

639Matches
54%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
90.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4852%1.1417.6
Nuke4461%1.2119.1
Vertigo3057%1.1517.9
Dust22741%1.0818.3
Ancient1942%0.9715.2
Mirage1856%0.9814.7
Overpass1040%1.2519.6
Anubis20%1.2323.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
553msReaction time
55.3%T opening success
76.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
12.45HE damage / grenade
3.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9015 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0428%15 Oct →
inferno14–160.0525%15 Oct →
dust211–130.0725%2 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0119%2 Oct →
cache13–70.0734%1 Oct →
nuke13–110.1227%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0020%11 Aug →
mirage13–30.0925%11 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0217%11 Aug →
mirage11–130.0431%6 Aug →
inferno13–110.1028%6 Aug →
ancient15–150.0521%6 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0226%4 Aug →
nuke13–110.1124%4 Aug →
inferno13–110.0520%4 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0017%4 Aug →
anubis13–90.0620%3 Aug →
ancient11–130.0415%3 Aug →
ancient10–130.0120%2 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0019%2 Aug →
cache16–140.0419%2 Aug →
nuke13–110.0419%2 Aug →
inferno13–70.0326%2 Aug →
nuke13–90.1022%29 Jul →
inferno13–70.0919%29 Jul →
inferno10–130.0925%28 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.0115%24 Jul →
mirage10–130.0721%24 Jul →
mirage9–130.0021%17 Jul →
dust28–130.0129%16 Jul →
inferno13–80.0125%16 Jul →
cache13–70.1132%14 Jul →
cache13–60.0733%14 Jul →
dust213–60.0138%14 Jul →
mirage10–130.0323%14 Jul →
dust28–130.0519%14 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0410%13 Jul →
inferno13–30.1222%13 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0226%13 Jul →
inferno13–20.0324%13 Jul →
cache13–70.1135%13 Jul →
ancient11–130.0224%12 Jul →
inferno10–130.0523%12 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0226%12 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.049%12 Jul →
nuke13–100.0517%12 Jul →
mirage13–30.0621%12 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0418%12 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0319%1 Jul →
overpass5–130.0133%30 Jun →
vertigo9–00.4313%28 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0217%27 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0327%25 Jun →
inferno13–100.0217%22 Jun →
mirage8–130.0428%19 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0215%19 Jun →
nuke22–180.0722%11 Jun →
mirage9–130.0022%6 Jun →
nuke16–19-0.0022%2 Jun →
nuke13–100.0822%2 Jun →
overpass13–110.0118%1 Jun →
anubis13–110.0742%1 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0015%31 May →
ancient7–130.0324%31 May →
nuke10–00.1324%31 May →
inferno13–80.0626%27 May →
anubis16–140.0216%25 May →
inferno13–100.0127%25 May →
mirage11–130.0817%25 May →
anubis16–140.0531%25 May →
overpass6–13-0.066%25 May →
dust23–13-0.0923%25 May →
inferno13–30.1022%23 May →
dust216–130.0419%23 May →
overpass6–130.0017%17 May →
inferno5–130.0330%15 May →
mirage13–90.0233%15 May →
inferno16–130.0224%15 May →
dust213–30.1124%15 May →
ancient11–13-0.0216%15 May →
inferno13–20.0342%14 May →
inferno13–110.0327%14 May →
nuke13–30.2337%14 May →
inferno16–140.0320%12 May →
nuke13–40.0426%12 May →
nuke11–50.0832%12 May →
inferno6–13-0.0530%12 May →
ancient13–70.0527%10 May →
inferno13–9-0.0026%10 May →
inferno13–90.1124%9 May →
ancient13–100.0922%9 May →
nuke13–100.0419%9 May →
overpass13–60.0523%9 May →
inferno7–130.0621%9 May →
nuke9–60.0527%7 May →
inferno9–30.1123%7 May →
poseidon9–30.0536%7 May →
ancient13–6-0.0123%7 May →
overpass6–130.0523%7 May →
inferno14–16-0.0024%4 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.