Zyrk

Zyrk — CS2 Stats

76561197981765513[U:1:21499785]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

657Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,433Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51008 of 259896 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,433 +1,856 3 Mar – 1 Nov · 40 days played
20,46923,627peak 23,6273 Mar1 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,833 +0 13 Sept – 22 Sept · 3 observations
1,8331,833peak 1,83313 Sept22 Sept
23,627Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,833Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-03-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,194 below peak (23,627)
  • +846 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,567 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZyrkFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,433 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,833csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning70
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.5
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 46% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time544ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 1 Mar →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 4 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 21 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 28% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2616–1062%0.03
dust2D185–1328%-0.02
anubisC167–944%0.02
nukeB137–654%0.03
infernoS107–370%0.05
mirageC94–544%-0.01
cache—42–250%0.01
overpass—41–325%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

121Matches
65%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
83.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke2162%1.4117.3
Ancient2080%1.6319.1
Mirage1173%1.1016.2
Dust21145%1.0314.1
Overpass786%1.2115.7
Inferno475%1.1515.3
Anubis367%0.9613.3
Train250%0.517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
536msReaction time
45.6%T opening success
61.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
8.28HE damage / grenade
8.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.0623%1 Nov →
mirage13–70.0110%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0515%30 Oct →
cache8–30.0217%30 Oct →
ancient13–100.0025%28 Oct →
nuke11–130.0225%28 Oct →
anubis6–130.0320%27 Oct →
ancient13–20.059%27 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0223%20 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0325%15 Oct →
inferno13–30.0050%4 Oct →
nuke7–130.0418%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0519%30 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0215%28 Sept →
anubis13–100.0219%28 Sept →
mirage13–70.0524%27 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0826%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0228%21 Sept →
ancient13–110.0916%30 Aug →
inferno12–160.0221%30 Aug →
anubis10–130.0113%26 Aug →
cache13–70.0714%26 Aug →
dust29–130.0320%26 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.038%26 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0114%24 Aug →
nuke13–60.039%23 Aug →
inferno10–130.0217%20 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0421%19 Aug →
anubis13–110.1118%19 Aug →
nuke13–90.0018%19 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0319%18 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0011%18 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0415%14 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.046%14 Aug →
nuke10–130.0220%14 Aug →
cache10–130.0111%4 Aug →
nuke13–80.0514%4 Aug →
dust29–130.0826%24 Jul →
inferno13–50.0517%9 May →
anubis13–9-0.049%6 May →
dust216–12-0.0315%4 May →
ancient7–13-0.0010%4 May →
overpass14–160.058%27 Apr →
ancient16–130.0416%27 Apr →
dust20–13-0.074%26 Apr →
nuke13–100.0416%26 Apr →
ancient13–110.0116%24 Apr →
ancient13–20.139%24 Apr →
anubis13–80.0913%23 Apr →
dust25–13-0.049%23 Apr →
ancient9–130.035%23 Apr →
ancient6–130.0822%22 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0711%20 Apr →
ancient11–130.0120%20 Apr →
anubis13–30.1120%20 Apr →
nuke13–30.0725%20 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0316%19 Apr →
nuke8–130.0519%19 Apr →
anubis13–100.0521%19 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0313%13 Apr →
ancient16–130.0911%12 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.048%12 Apr →
anubis15–150.0313%11 Apr →
inferno13–70.0417%11 Apr →
nuke13–110.0118%11 Apr →
overpass2–13-0.039%7 Apr →
mirage13–40.008%6 Apr →
inferno13–30.0714%6 Apr →
ancient13–80.0315%6 Apr →
ancient9–130.0511%30 Mar →
mirage6–130.0112%30 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0317%29 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0523%23 Mar →
mirage8–4-0.044%23 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.029%23 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0812%23 Mar →
dust213–16-0.0316%22 Mar →
ancient13–100.028%22 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0510%18 Mar →
overpass13–90.047%18 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0217%17 Mar →
ancient6–130.009%17 Mar →
ancient15–150.0613%17 Mar →
anubis10–130.0514%16 Mar →
inferno16–140.0821%16 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0111%15 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0515%15 Mar →
ancient13–100.039%14 Mar →
inferno13–100.0220%14 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0112%14 Mar →
ancient15–150.1012%11 Mar →
nuke13–90.0118%9 Mar →
ancient13–40.0813%9 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0714%4 Mar →
mirage10–130.0123%3 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.019%3 Mar →
anubis13–80.117%2 Mar →
nuke3–130.0310%2 Mar →
inferno13–80.1912%1 Mar →
anubis14–160.0624%1 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.