✪ kipe32

✪ kipe32 — CS2 Stats

76561197972253474[U:1:11987746]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,457Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,255Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51044 of 251281 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,255 +2,695 23 Mar – 7 Oct · 29 days played
18,46523,379peak 23,37923 Mar7 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,670 +0 5 Sept – 21 Sept · 3 observations
1,6701,670peak 1,6705 Sept21 Sept
23,379Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,670Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-02-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,670
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 81 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,124 below peak (23,379)
  • -935 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,507 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,745 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ kipe32PREMIER22,255 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,670csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning63
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLWLLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −74ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility7.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.3
Utility7.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time571ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 11–13 · inferno, 1 Oct →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · inferno, 20 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 12–16 · inferno, 30 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 8 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 9overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC239–1439%-0.01
dust2C228–1436%-0.01
nukeB157–847%0.01
anubisB136–746%-0.03
mirageA95–456%0.01
infernoB84–450%0.04
overpassD51–420%0.03
cache—42–250%0.01
warden—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

601Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
75.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4745%0.9513.7
Dust23759%1.0915.2
Nuke3161%1.0015.1
Inferno3129%0.9213.2
Anubis2548%0.9612.2
Overpass2050%1.0914.3
Mirage1242%0.9313.3
Train450%0.688.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
570msReaction time
45.8%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
10.45HE damage / grenade
12.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke12–16-0.0415%8 Oct →
dust213–90.0318%7 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0516%7 Oct →
inferno11–130.1117%1 Oct →
dust213–80.0312%30 Sept →
ancient9–130.0713%30 Sept →
nuke9–130.0412%30 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0414%29 Sept →
ancient12–160.0222%29 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0511%28 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0221%28 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0413%21 Sept →
dust24–130.0114%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0114%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.0731%20 Sept →
dust29–130.0427%20 Sept →
ancient10–130.0115%17 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0311%17 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0413%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0716%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0313%6 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0223%6 Sept →
dust213–100.0326%3 Sept →
nuke13–90.0212%3 Sept →
anubis5–10-0.070%2 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.026%30 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0422%30 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.048%28 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0124%28 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0315%26 Aug →
cache13–70.0220%26 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0516%26 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0316%26 Aug →
nuke8–130.0016%24 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0213%24 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0320%24 Aug →
nuke13–60.0224%23 Aug →
inferno10–130.0429%20 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0624%20 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0417%20 Aug →
cache11–130.0917%19 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0322%19 Aug →
nuke13–90.0422%19 Aug →
dust213–60.0418%18 Aug →
ancient13–100.0319%18 Aug →
dust215–150.0016%14 Aug →
ancient11–130.0018%14 Aug →
nuke10–130.0320%14 Aug →
inferno10–130.0320%14 Aug →
nuke13–90.0017%12 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0022%12 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0120%30 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0718%30 Jun →
ancient15–150.0424%24 May →
nuke13–20.0914%24 May →
dust216–120.0318%4 May →
ancient7–13-0.0615%4 May →
overpass14–16-0.0110%27 Apr →
ancient16–130.0221%27 Apr →
dust20–13-0.085%26 Apr →
nuke13–100.0414%26 Apr →
mirage9–130.0129%20 Apr →
ancient11–130.0114%20 Apr →
anubis13–3-0.095%20 Apr →
nuke13–30.0818%20 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0624%19 Apr →
nuke8–13-0.0416%19 Apr →
anubis13–10-0.057%19 Apr →
dust24–130.0023%13 Apr →
overpass2–13-0.0510%7 Apr →
mirage13–40.044%6 Apr →
inferno13–30.067%6 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0111%6 Apr →
dust213–90.0323%31 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.0510%31 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0318%30 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0215%30 Mar →
mirage2–130.0011%29 Mar →
dust22–130.0321%29 Mar →
dust210–13-0.029%24 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0521%24 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0125%23 Mar →
mirage8–40.0322%23 Mar →
overpass9–130.0518%23 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0611%23 Mar →
anubis11–130.0318%18 Mar →
overpass13–90.0718%18 Mar →
anubis10–130.0330%16 Mar →
inferno16–140.0328%16 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0111%14 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0117%14 Mar →
dust213–70.0519%14 Mar →
overpass6–130.0717%10 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0622%8 Mar →
anubis13–10.0415%8 Mar →
warden13–8-0.0121%7 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0220%22 Feb →
ancient13–60.0214%15 Feb →
dust214–16-0.0819%15 Feb →
anubis13–10-0.0220%14 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.