sniiX

sniiX — CS2 Stats

76561197981641822[U:1:21376094]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,737Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,713Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,121Top 10% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19926 of 259593 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,121 +3,698 6 Sept – 20 Oct · 25 days played
20,27725,121peak 25,1216 Sept20 Oct
25,121Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,121
  • +3,044 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,879 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.5%48.2%50.9%4.5% short
Shot accuracy14.0%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.071.09above
Match win rate41.3%46.9%48.4%7.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsniiXFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,121 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning44
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–41–1Last 10058%Win rateWWLWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility7.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.4
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time550ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 3–0 · mirage, 13 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · cache, 16 Oct →
281msFastest reaction time · 0–2 · cache, 16 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 15anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2517–868%0.01
dust2B1910–953%0.01
infernoB179–853%0.02
mirageS1512–380%0.06
anubisD124–833%-0.00
ancientA74–357%0.05
nukeC52–340%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

158,600Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,054Matches
41.3%Match win rate
46.5%Headshot %
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
13,270MVPs
3,713Hours (in match)
7,974Bombs planted
1,724Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,173
AWP35,313
SSG 086,833
MP94,458
MAC-103,043
P2502,171

Lifetime map wins

17,107inferno
7,580dust2
2,734nuke
1,605train
1,530vertigo
899cbble
76office
48italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

634Matches
54%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
87.5ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2250%1.2517.1
Dust21856%1.1816.5
Inferno1765%1.5317.2
Cache1090%1.5216.1
Nuke850%1.1513.8
Anubis838%1.3415.0
Ancient743%1.4117.3
Vertigo10%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
555msReaction time
44.1%T opening success
31.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
11.32HE damage / grenade
20.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.1181% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0315%20 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0312%20 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0820%20 Oct →
cache13–60.1223%20 Oct →
dust213–50.0727%20 Oct →
inferno13–70.0124%19 Oct →
cache3–130.0119%19 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0221%19 Oct →
cache9–00.0315%19 Oct →
mirage13–50.0935%19 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0741%19 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0226%19 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.066%19 Oct →
inferno13–30.0619%19 Oct →
ancient13–100.0518%19 Oct →
inferno13–10.0632%19 Oct →
mirage13–60.0320%18 Oct →
mirage13–50.1020%18 Oct →
cache13–60.0024%18 Oct →
inferno10–30.1523%18 Oct →
mirage3–50.0344%18 Oct →
ancient1–80.0419%18 Oct →
cache13–90.0318%16 Oct →
mirage13–50.0429%16 Oct →
cache0–2-0.04100%16 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0335%16 Oct →
inferno13–30.0420%16 Oct →
mirage13–60.0719%15 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0011%15 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0019%15 Oct →
dust26–130.0233%15 Oct →
mirage13–50.0315%15 Oct →
cache13–60.0219%15 Oct →
ancient13–30.1426%13 Oct →
cache13–50.0116%13 Oct →
dust213–60.0331%13 Oct →
cache13–90.0922%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0221%13 Oct →
cache13–50.0318%13 Oct →
inferno3–70.0641%10 Oct →
mirage9–130.0931%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0031%9 Oct →
mirage13–110.0413%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0221%9 Oct →
ancient13–110.0418%8 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0513%6 Oct →
ancient13–70.0518%6 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0519%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0429%5 Oct →
cache13–100.0137%5 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0632%5 Oct →
cache13–70.0230%5 Oct →
dust213–60.0225%29 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0821%29 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0621%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0218%29 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0014%29 Sept →
mirage16–120.0217%29 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0317%28 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0219%28 Sept →
dust213–40.1027%28 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0119%28 Sept →
dust213–70.0628%28 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0527%28 Sept →
dust213–20.0822%28 Sept →
cache13–60.0613%28 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0226%28 Sept →
mirage13–50.0619%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.0419%26 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0025%26 Sept →
cache13–40.0529%26 Sept →
ancient14–160.0413%22 Sept →
mirage13–110.0539%22 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0524%21 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0327%21 Sept →
anubis9–130.0318%21 Sept →
cache9–130.0024%21 Sept →
dust210–130.0019%19 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0442%18 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0320%18 Sept →
inferno16–130.0342%17 Sept →
inferno13–100.0720%17 Sept →
cache16–120.0017%17 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0344%14 Sept →
anubis13–80.0820%14 Sept →
dust213–60.0820%13 Sept →
mirage3–00.2417%13 Sept →
cache13–80.0433%13 Sept →
anubis13–90.1018%11 Sept →
nuke6–130.0033%11 Sept →
inferno8–130.0234%11 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0610%9 Sept →
anubis13–40.0214%9 Sept →
inferno13–60.0318%8 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0046%7 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0324%7 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0119%7 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0123%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.0717%7 Sept →
dust213–20.0630%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.