✪XiaoPiOuO

✪XiaoPiOuO — CS2 Stats

CX76561197980813957[U:1:20548229]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

2,587Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,013Hours in CS78Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,035Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18599 of 219840 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 14 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,035 -86 14 Aug16 Sept · 15 days played
24,87625,671peak 25,67114 Aug16 Sept
26,120Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 636 below peak (25,671)
  • +20 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,965 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches39
Win rate41%
K/D1.07
Headshot %36%

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate34.7%48.3%51.0%16.3% short
Shot accuracy10.0%13.2%13.7%3.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.071.09meets
Match win rate48.7%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪XiaoPiOuOFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,035 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning69
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47458Last 10047%Win rateLWWTLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −10.2pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.0
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.9
Utility4.0
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels7.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time560ms+43ms
first ⅓ avg 518ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 14 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 11 Sept
367msFastest reaction time · 12–3 · dust2, 26 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 9anubisWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B45242153%0.02
infernoB157847%0.03
ancientC125742%0.00
anubisD102820%-0.02
mirageA95456%0.03
cacheD51420%-0.05
office21150%-0.00
nuke110100%0.03
vertigo110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,592Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
6,793Matches
48.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
34.7%Headshot %
10.0%Shot accuracy
13,789MVPs
2,452Hours (in match)
8,217Bombs planted
1,292Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP32,563
AK-4716,069
MAC-103,821
MP93,693
SSG 082,517

Lifetime map wins

12,797dust2
9,935inferno
2,816vertigo
2,501nuke
1,019office
940train
734lake
371cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

284Matches
56%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
78.6ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7356%1.0816.9
Dust24854%1.2216.0
Inferno3142%1.2317.0
Anubis2854%1.1516.6
Ancient2763%1.0616.6
Vertigo2060%1.1517.8
Nuke1861%1.1516.6
Overpass683%1.6321.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
68.2%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
554msReaction time
54.0%T opening success
64.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
10.31HE damage / grenade
5.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4593 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust214–16-0.0123%16 Sept
dust213–40.1136%15 Sept
ancient13–9-0.015%15 Sept
dust212–12-0.0212%15 Sept
dust22–13-0.0022%15 Sept
mirage13–90.047%15 Sept
dust213–80.0424%15 Sept
dust210–13-0.0214%15 Sept
dust213–30.1112%13 Sept
office9–13-0.0017%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0511%13 Sept
inferno12–120.1018%12 Sept
dust23–13-0.1022%11 Sept
dust213–9-0.0522%11 Sept
dust29–130.0320%11 Sept
cache13–1-0.03100%11 Sept
office13–40.0022%11 Sept
dust27–13-0.0218%10 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0117%10 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0323%10 Sept
ancient13–80.0013%9 Sept
dust213–30.1328%8 Sept
dust23–130.0024%8 Sept
inferno3–9-0.039%7 Sept
dust29–130.0223%7 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0122%6 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0013%6 Sept
dust212–12-0.0611%6 Sept
dust213–110.0415%6 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0017%5 Sept
nuke13–20.0311%5 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0314%5 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0319%5 Sept
mirage15–150.0117%4 Sept
dust213–60.0314%4 Sept
mirage13–20.006%3 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0713%3 Sept
dust213–90.0226%2 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0224%2 Sept
dust213–40.0023%2 Sept
ancient4–13-0.034%2 Sept
dust213–110.0719%1 Sept
dust213–7-0.026%1 Sept
dust216–140.0515%1 Sept
dust23–130.0014%1 Sept
ancient13–30.0014%29 Aug
anubis6–130.0111%29 Aug
vertigo12–1-0.0225%29 Aug
dust213–30.0630%29 Aug
mirage13–100.0218%29 Aug
anubis9–13-0.015%28 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0112%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0119%26 Aug
dust213–40.0610%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0421%26 Aug
cache2–13-0.0214%26 Aug
dust213–80.0725%26 Aug
dust213–30.1021%26 Aug
dust212–3-0.0018%26 Aug
cache12–12-0.0410%26 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0320%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0119%25 Aug
mirage13–00.1113%24 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0417%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0329%23 Aug
dust29–130.0225%22 Aug
dust212–120.0611%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0230%22 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0812%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.0118%22 Aug
mirage3–0-0.010%22 Aug
dust216–12-0.0124%22 Aug
anubis2–13-0.1021%22 Aug
inferno4–60.066%20 Aug
dust26–13-0.0325%20 Aug
anubis12–120.0210%20 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0218%20 Aug
dust213–40.0318%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0513%19 Aug
dust213–80.0710%19 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0813%19 Aug
inferno10–130.0114%18 Aug
ancient11–130.0822%17 Aug
dust22–13-0.0710%16 Aug
inferno9–70.0636%15 Aug
ancient8–130.019%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0312%15 Aug
cache1–13-0.119%15 Aug
mirage12–120.0613%15 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0330%14 Aug
inferno9–70.2320%14 Aug
inferno9–60.1413%14 Aug
inferno9–20.1219%14 Aug
dust213–4-0.019%14 Aug
dust213–40.1223%14 Aug
anubis13–100.0426%14 Aug
dust210–130.0321%14 Aug
ancient3–130.018%14 Aug
dust27–100.0131%14 Aug
dust212–6-0.0318%14 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →