⛧ SATAnic addict fish ⛧

⛧ SATAnic addict fish ⛧ — CS2 Stats

FI76561197977566559[U:1:17300831]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,283Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,750Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,777Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25482 of 259896 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,792 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,777 +2,201 26 Sept – 27 Oct · 10 days played
22,57624,777peak 24,77726 Sept27 Oct
24,864Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,792Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-09-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,792
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 209 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,777
  • +2,201 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 223 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate40.2%46.8%48.2%8.0% short
Shot accuracy12.4%13.0%13.2%0.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.061.070.05 short
Match win rate43.9%46.3%46.9%3.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG⛧ SATAnic addict fish ⛧FACEITLevel 8 · 1,792 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,777 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,792csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning78
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateLWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.9
Positioning7.8
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch3.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning7.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time562ms+50ms
first ⅓ avg 511ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · nuke, 7 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 13 Oct →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 5 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
14–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2111–1052%0.00
nukeA1912–763%0.02
cacheA159–660%0.01
infernoA148–657%0.01
anubisA138–562%-0.01
ancientC104–640%0.02
mirageB63–350%-0.00
overpass—21–150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

243,087Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
10,836Matches
43.9%Match win rate
40.2%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy
24,943MVPs
4,769Hours (in match)
12,477Bombs planted
2,683Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4776,143
AWP16,790
XM10145,791
UMP-455,471
SSG 085,046
SCAR-204,525

Lifetime map wins

17,530nuke
12,839vertigo
10,536dust2
7,110train
6,194inferno
2,567cbble
2,335office
979militia

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,161Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210136%1.0716.5
Nuke9057%1.1315.9
Inferno8851%1.1416.1
Ancient5947%1.0916.2
Anubis2763%1.2618.2
Overpass2339%1.1316.1
Cache1953%1.2616.2
Mirage1619%0.9215.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
567msReaction time
53.0%T opening success
56.6%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
10.07HE damage / grenade
9.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0413%28 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0017%27 Oct →
dust213–60.0734%27 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.037%27 Oct →
mirage13–60.0327%27 Oct →
ancient13–70.0520%27 Oct →
dust29–130.0116%27 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0114%26 Oct →
cache10–130.0411%26 Oct →
anubis13–80.0117%26 Oct →
dust28–130.0117%26 Oct →
nuke16–130.1115%25 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0113%25 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0519%25 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0316%25 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0613%25 Oct →
anubis13–160.0221%23 Oct →
inferno2–130.0710%23 Oct →
cache9–50.0319%23 Oct →
dust212–120.0613%22 Oct →
cache13–80.0533%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0113%21 Oct →
nuke13–80.0413%21 Oct →
anubis19–160.038%21 Oct →
inferno16–130.0310%20 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0315%20 Oct →
nuke13–80.0223%20 Oct →
nuke13–20.0615%20 Oct →
dust27–130.0120%18 Oct →
cache13–70.0814%18 Oct →
ancient14–160.0322%15 Oct →
nuke13–80.0617%15 Oct →
inferno7–130.0315%15 Oct →
ancient13–110.0911%13 Oct →
dust211–130.0234%13 Oct →
dust213–110.0012%13 Oct →
nuke11–130.0020%13 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0714%12 Oct →
dust28–130.0011%12 Oct →
ancient13–10.0522%11 Oct →
dust213–70.025%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0213%11 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0310%11 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0111%11 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0524%11 Oct →
overpass19–15-0.006%8 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0121%8 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0320%8 Oct →
nuke13–80.1223%7 Oct →
ancient9–130.1020%7 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.049%6 Oct →
mirage10–130.0731%6 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0419%6 Oct →
dust213–110.0328%6 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0115%6 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1017%5 Oct →
cache13–60.0727%5 Oct →
ancient11–130.0214%5 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0311%5 Oct →
nuke13–60.0812%5 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0722%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0717%1 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0111%1 Oct →
anubis13–90.0232%29 Sept →
inferno13–90.0217%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0823%28 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0015%28 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0219%27 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0026%27 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0222%26 Sept →
dust213–40.0413%26 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0011%26 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0724%26 Sept →
inferno11–130.0513%24 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0410%24 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.039%24 Sept →
nuke13–110.0315%24 Sept →
inferno19–160.016%23 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0025%23 Sept →
anubis13–50.0218%23 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0211%23 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0019%23 Sept →
dust213–10-0.028%22 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0313%22 Sept →
nuke13–70.1020%22 Sept →
inferno12–160.0110%22 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0215%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0828%20 Sept →
dust220–22-0.0211%17 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0018%17 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0215%17 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0022%17 Sept →
anubis13–70.0913%16 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0412%13 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0114%13 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0514%11 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0322%11 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0415%11 Sept →
overpass5–13-0.068%11 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0328%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.