CnC

CnC — CS2 Stats

FI76561197977159884[U:1:16894156]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,180Tracked matches32%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,122Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,164Purple band · top ~19.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,432 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,164 -3,778 9 Aug – 11 Oct · 18 days played
17,16420,953peak 20,9539 Aug11 Oct
21,319Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,432Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,432
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 99 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,789 below peak (20,953)
  • -1,769 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,836 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,030), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.5%46.8%48.2%10.8% short
Shot accuracy13.7%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.951.061.070.12 short
Match win rate45.9%46.3%46.9%1.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCnCFACEITLevel 8 · 1,432 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,164 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,432csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning62
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40–55–5Last 10040%Win rateLLLLLLWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.3pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 1–8–1 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 20

  • 6–12–2 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility7.4
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch2.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 58% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning6.2
Utility7.4
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time589ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 7–13 · nuke, 10 Aug →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · nuke, 24 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · cache, 16 Sept →
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L6Current streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2711–1641%-0.01
dust2B209–1145%0.01
nukeD155–1033%-0.00
cacheB137–654%-0.00
mirageD113–827%-0.03
ancientD92–722%-0.03
anubisA53–260%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

217,055Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
11,276Matches
45.9%Match win rate
37.5%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
27,769MVPs
5,122Hours (in match)
22,235Bombs planted
2,763Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4748,304
AWP19,169
P9010,515
P2507,806
MAC-106,890
MP95,825
FAMAS5,335

Lifetime map wins

31,153dust2
28,848inferno
9,932nuke
2,429train
2,074cbble
1,230vertigo
428lake
334aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

320Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
78.7ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5652%1.0014.8
Mirage4939%0.8913.5
Dust23962%1.1516.1
Nuke3757%1.2015.6
Ancient3450%0.8313.4
Cache1953%1.0013.8
Anubis1242%0.9816.0
Overpass1233%0.8712.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
65.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
593msReaction time
48.9%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
14.43HE damage / grenade
10.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0211%11 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0421%11 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0324%11 Oct →
inferno9–130.0320%4 Oct →
ancient16–190.0214%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0314%4 Oct →
mirage13–90.0420%4 Oct →
nuke6–130.0112%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0013%2 Oct →
dust212–120.0817%1 Oct →
inferno12–120.027%1 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0626%1 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.048%27 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0517%27 Sept →
nuke13–40.0811%27 Sept →
inferno13–80.0019%27 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.069%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.015%25 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0916%25 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.052%25 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0218%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0723%25 Sept →
dust213–80.0619%25 Sept →
dust213–40.0421%25 Sept →
inferno6–130.028%24 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0112%24 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0834%24 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.046%18 Sept →
dust213–100.0219%18 Sept →
dust28–130.0225%18 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.067%17 Sept →
cache4–13-0.062%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.0116%17 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0611%16 Sept →
cache16–130.098%16 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.076%16 Sept →
dust28–13-0.035%16 Sept →
inferno13–50.0715%16 Sept →
inferno8–130.0410%14 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0713%13 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0313%13 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.044%13 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0612%13 Sept →
dust212–120.0013%13 Sept →
dust212–120.0221%13 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0510%11 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0414%11 Sept →
nuke13–70.0631%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.049%10 Sept →
anubis3–130.0110%9 Sept →
ancient15–19-0.0512%9 Sept →
nuke11–130.0118%9 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0318%9 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0410%8 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0324%7 Sept →
inferno6–130.0218%7 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.058%2 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0314%2 Sept →
mirage10–130.0321%2 Sept →
inferno13–80.0412%2 Sept →
nuke8–130.0110%31 Aug →
dust27–130.0115%31 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0217%31 Aug →
dust216–130.0122%31 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0217%31 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0620%30 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0020%30 Aug →
cache13–100.0410%30 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0733%30 Aug →
dust211–13-0.026%30 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0311%30 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.0311%29 Aug →
inferno9–70.0111%29 Aug →
cache15–150.0116%24 Aug →
mirage7–130.0126%24 Aug →
cache14–16-0.0423%23 Aug →
anubis13–40.0110%23 Aug →
anubis13–50.0614%23 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.024%23 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0119%23 Aug →
nuke13–80.088%23 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0814%22 Aug →
dust213–90.0424%22 Aug →
inferno13–50.0112%18 Aug →
dust213–90.007%18 Aug →
inferno13–100.0117%18 Aug →
inferno10–130.0122%18 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0513%16 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0519%16 Aug →
cache13–40.036%16 Aug →
inferno9–70.0515%16 Aug →
cache13–100.0116%16 Aug →
dust211–130.0412%16 Aug →
anubis12–160.007%15 Aug →
nuke7–130.0919%10 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0517%10 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0119%9 Aug →
dust213–40.0410%9 Aug →
cache13–110.0210%9 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0116%9 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.