zehnilicious

zehnilicious — CS2 Stats

76561197976948775[U:1:16683047]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

217Tracked matches33%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,440Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.0 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating9,895Light Blue band · top ~55.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,313 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Jul 2026 (118 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,895 +4,329 31 May – 6 Jul · 7 days played
5,56614,617peak 14,61731 May6 Jul
14,617Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,313Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
66Days played since 2021-12-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,313
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 38 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,722 below peak (14,617)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 105 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate36.8%43.8%44.8%8.0% short
Shot accuracy18.1%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.001.021.030.04 short
Match win rate44.1%44.7%45.2%1.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzehniliciousFACEITLevel 5 · 1,313 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER9,895 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO1,313csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning54
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateLLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim3.1
Utility5.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch1.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 656ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning5.4
Utility5.4
Mechanics2.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time660ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy11.6%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.3% → last ⅓ avg 11.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 27 Feb →
26%Best headshot accuracy · 8–16 · dust2, 22 Dec →
469msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · inferno, 19 Jan →
16–3Biggest win · dust2, 19 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
37Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 39ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3924–1562%-0.01
infernoA1810–856%-0.02
nukeC145–936%-0.01
anubisD51–420%-0.05
ancientD50–50%-0.03
overpass—42–250%-0.01
cache—40–40%-0.03
train—30–30%-0.04
tuscan—31–233%-0.02
edin—22–0100%-0.03
mirage—21–150%0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,163Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
2,306Matches
44.1%Match win rate
36.8%Headshot %
18.1%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 5 players
4,555MVPs
898Hours (in match)
2,014Bombs planted
356Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,402
AWP3,538
P2502,156
P901,648
MAC-101,065

Lifetime map wins

9,494dust2
2,439inferno
1,951nuke
730train
257cbble
123vertigo
81lake
37italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

157Matches
50%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
70.0ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25953%0.9114.2
Inferno3060%0.8213.5
Anubis2544%0.8714.3
Nuke2152%0.7513.1
Cache714%0.6711.1
Ancient560%0.8212.4
Train30%0.4810.3
Mirage10%0.609.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.6%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
59.7%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
656msReaction time
29.5%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
10.57HE damage / grenade
4.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.4625° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.5787% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0617%6 Jul →
dust212–160.0414%3 Jul →
overpass8–13-0.0315%3 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0010%3 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0418%3 Jul →
inferno13–70.0023%3 Jul →
dust29–130.007%27 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0413%21 Jun →
anubis12–16-0.059%15 Jun →
inferno3–13-0.100%15 Jun →
nuke13–6-0.049%15 Jun →
dust210–130.048%8 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0719%2 Jun →
ancient1–13-0.0812%22 May →
cache8–13-0.0414%15 May →
anubis11–13-0.0210%5 May →
ancient14–16-0.0210%28 Apr →
anubis3–13-0.0411%24 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0112%24 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0211%11 Apr →
inferno13–70.0516%11 Apr →
dust213–90.0618%11 Apr →
dust26–130.0413%24 Mar →
nuke13–70.047%24 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.037%24 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.062%24 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.048%24 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0412%10 Feb →
dust24–70.048%20 Jan →
dust213–10.0520%13 Dec →
ancient11–130.0416%18 Nov →
nuke13–5-0.016%18 Nov →
dust213–90.0011%11 Nov →
dust213–100.019%11 Nov →
dust213–70.058%25 Oct →
dust213–50.017%24 Oct →
dust213–40.068%15 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0913%29 Jul →
dust213–70.006%16 Jul →
dust213–40.0316%15 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0510%14 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.018%13 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0415%5 Jul →
inferno9–130.027%28 Jun →
dust24–13-0.0910%24 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0112%16 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0310%16 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0915%1 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0510%25 Feb →
dust213–110.0413%25 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0216%25 Jan →
dust213–11-0.006%9 Dec →
overpass13–7-0.0612%15 Nov →
edin13–90.0011%15 Nov →
train3–13-0.0520%15 Nov →
edin13–8-0.0714%15 Nov →
dust213–1-0.049%21 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0017%16 Aug →
vertigo12–120.0513%16 Aug →
nuke15–150.0017%9 Aug →
nuke10–130.079%28 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.039%7 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.0214%31 May →
overpass13–100.0412%31 May →
mirage13–90.0326%31 May →
inferno14–16-0.0212%5 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.003%27 Feb →
inferno13–20.1312%27 Feb →
inferno13–90.0511%15 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0715%30 Nov →
dust216–9-0.0310%18 Apr →
inferno4–16-0.0418%3 Apr →
dust216–120.0510%3 Apr →
nuke15–15-0.0513%13 Mar →
train8–16-0.047%13 Mar →
dust216–13-0.0512%2 Mar →
dust216–14-0.0112%2 Mar →
dust216–11-0.0410%2 Mar →
dust29–16-0.0016%2 Mar →
cache13–160.027%19 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.014%19 Jan →
inferno16–130.0110%19 Jan →
dust216–13-0.0417%25 Dec →
inferno16–13-0.0510%23 Dec →
dust28–16-0.0926%22 Dec →
dust216–3-0.0312%19 Dec →
dust25–16-0.0814%12 Dec →
dust216–30.008%12 Dec →
dust20–16-0.0814%8 Dec →
dust216–120.0117%5 Dec →
tuscan9–16-0.0915%5 Dec →
cache8–16-0.0115%5 Dec →
ancient14–16-0.0312%28 Oct →
tuscan16–12-0.029%18 Aug →
tuscan11–160.0410%18 Aug →
train7–16-0.033%8 Jun →
overpass11–160.016%10 May →
dust216–40.009%21 Feb →
inferno6–16-0.093%25 Jan →
cache12–16-0.078%3 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.